• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 30 (2025)
Volume Volume 29 (2024)
Volume Volume 28 (2023)
Volume Volume 27 (2022)
Volume Volume 26 (2021)
Volume Volume 25 (2020)
Volume Volume 24 (2019)
Volume Volume 23 (2018)
Volume Volume 22 (2017)
Volume Volume 21 (2016)
Volume Volume 20 (2015)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 19 (2014)
Radwan, F., Gomaa, M., El- Kady, F., Gerges, N. (2015). Response of Some Physiological, Yield Characters and Seed Quality of Sunflower to Mineral, Organic and Biofertilizers. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 20(1), 22-31. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2015.161140
Fathy Ibrahim Radwan; Mahmoud Gomaa; Fahmy AbdElAziz El- Kady; Nevein Latif Gerges. "Response of Some Physiological, Yield Characters and Seed Quality of Sunflower to Mineral, Organic and Biofertilizers". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 20, 1, 2015, 22-31. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2015.161140
Radwan, F., Gomaa, M., El- Kady, F., Gerges, N. (2015). 'Response of Some Physiological, Yield Characters and Seed Quality of Sunflower to Mineral, Organic and Biofertilizers', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 20(1), pp. 22-31. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2015.161140
Radwan, F., Gomaa, M., El- Kady, F., Gerges, N. Response of Some Physiological, Yield Characters and Seed Quality of Sunflower to Mineral, Organic and Biofertilizers. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2015; 20(1): 22-31. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2015.161140

Response of Some Physiological, Yield Characters and Seed Quality of Sunflower to Mineral, Organic and Biofertilizers

Article 3, Volume 20, Issue 1, March 2015, Page 22-31  XML PDF (734.96 K)
Document Type: Research papers
DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2015.161140
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Fathy Ibrahim Radwan1; Mahmoud Gomaa1; Fahmy AbdElAziz El- Kady2; Nevein Latif Gerges2
1Plant Production Dep., Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha) Alexandria University, Egypt.
2Agricultural Research Center, Sakha, Kafr El- Sheikh, Egypt.
Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm of Sakha Agricultural Research Station. Agricultural Reseach Center, Kafr El- Sheikh, Egypt during the two growing seasons 2011 and 2012 to study the response of some physiological, yield characters and seed quality of sunflower "Helianthus annulus, L." C.V. Sakha 53 to mineral organic and biofertilizers. The applied experimental design was randomized complete blocks with four replications.
 
The obtained results could be summarized as follows, (1) The results showed significant differences due to applied 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost on leaf area/plant, dry matter accumulation/plant  at all sampling dates days to full flowering, head diameter, 100- seed weight, seed yield (g)/plant and seed yield (kg)/fed. The highest seed yield/fed viz (2091.29 and 1961.84 kg/fed were obtained by application of 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost during both seasons (2) Application of 20 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost + Cerealine was the best combination to obtain the highest values of plant height at harvest and head diameter compared with fertilized by 10 kg N/fed. However, oil% and oil yield was increased significantly because of application 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost in both seasons. The present investigation suggests the need for more studies concerning the effect of mineral, organic and bioferlitization as well as applying NPK on sunflower plants under different environmental conditions using different types of soil especially newly reclaimed soil, to reach the optimum combination the achieve to best yield and quality of seed oil content.   
Keywords
sunflower; mineral (NPK); organic; biofertilizer; yield; oil yield
Main Subjects
Crops and quality
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus, L.) is one of the most important annual crops of the world grown for edible oil. It received considerable attention in Egypt due to its short growing season and it can be grown well under the low fertility soils in the newly reclaimed areas. So, sunflower could be one of the main suggested oil crops to solve edibled vegetable oil shortage in the country. Seeds contain 24- 49% oil and cake contains 25- 35% of protein (Henen, 2011).

 

Nutrition is essential for plant life and yield, therefore mineral fertilization is a common agronomic practice that leads to improve productivity. Mineral fertilization includes several elements, however, nitrogen and phosphorus are among the macro- elements that used on fertilization (Abou- Khadrah et al., 2002, Mohamed, 2003).

 

The organic manure is known to improve the properties of soil by increasing the limited moisture holding capacity. In addition, it can change the chemical properties of soil through lowering pH and extensively their beneficial effects are known for long time. Application of organic matter provide many essential nutrients needed by crop plants. The increase in crop yield due to using of animal manure have been imperative many times as resulted mainly from the nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium or the combination of the three elements (Awad, 2004, Aowad and Mohamed, 2009).

In addition, biofertilization is one of the most important factors used to product free from mineral fertilizer that cause environmental pollution and high rates of it lead to decrease in the potential activity of micro flora and the mobility of organic matters. Hence, the attention has been focused on the researches of bio- fertilization to safe attention for the chemical fertilizers (Namvar et al., 2012). Also, bio- fertilizers play vital role for increasing the number of microorganisms and accelerate certain microbial process in the rhizosphere of inoculated soil plants can change the available form of nutrients into plants (Abou- Khadrah et al., 2002; Bassal, 2003; El- Temssah, 2008).

 

Inoculation of Biofertilizers significantly affected plant height and total chlorophyll content. Biofertilizers also, significantly increased yield attributers viz. stem diameter, weight of seeds, filled seed/capitulum and 100- seed weight (g), as well as seed weight, biological yield and oil content. The combined inoculation of phosphate dissolving bacteria (PSB) + vesicular abuser mycoeehyizea (VAM) + Azotobacter recorded higher values of these Parameters as compared to PSB + Azotobacter and VAM + Azotobacter inculcation (Patra et al., 2013).

 

 Therefore, the objective of this study is the evaluating the effect of mineral, organic and bio- nitrogen fertilizer treatment on some growth attributes yield and its component of sunflower crop. 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two field Experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm of Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt during the two consecutive summer seasons, 2011and 2012. The applied experimental desing was randomized complete blocks with four replicates. The treatments were

 

  1. 10 kg N/fed.
  2. 20 kg N/fed.
  3. 30 kg N/fed.
  4. 10 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost.
  5. 10 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost.
  6. 10 kg N/fed + 20 m2 compost + Cerealine.
  7. 10 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost + Rizobacterin.
  8. 20 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost.
  9. 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost.

10. 20 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost + Cerealine.

11. 20 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost + Rizobacterin.

 

Analyzis of chemical and physical properties of the experimental soil site (0 to 30 cm depth) is shown in Table (1) and were carried out according to the methods reported by Page et al. (1982).


     Table (1): Physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil (average

                  of two seasons)

 

Sand

(%)

Silt

(%)

Clay

(%)

Soil texture

pH

EC

(dS/m)

CaCO3

(%)

Total N (%)

Available

P(mg/kg)

19.05

37.75

43.20

Clay

8.11

3.90

2.40

0.08

11.00

 

Table (2): Analysis of the applied organic manure (compost)

 

pH

EC

C/N

N%

P%

K%

Fe

mg/kg

Mn

mg/kg

Zn

mg/kg

7.5

2.90

1:12.06

1.58

1.49

1.78

4935

435

206

                         

Organic manure (compost) at the two rates was added during soil preparation before planting in both seasons. Analysis of organic manure are presented in Table (2). Prior to sowing seed inoculation was carried out using the biofertilizer with (N2- fixing) i.e Cerealine and Rhizobacterine: An Inoculate for all crops containing of Azospuillum lipofeuim and Bacillus polymx produced by Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt. Inoculation was performed by mixing seeds with the 400g/fed Cerealine and Rhizobacterin rates using Arabic gum (Arabic gum 5%).

 

 Nitrogen fertilizer was applied in the form of urea (46% N) at the rates of (10, 20 and 30 kg N/fed), after the thinning and before the first irrigation after planting. Phosphorus fertilizer was applied in the form of calcium super phosphate (15.5% P2O5) as treatments with land preparation.

 

Each plot consisted of 5 ridges 3m long and 60 cm apart with 30 cm space between plant. The size two rows were used for determing seed yield and its components.

 

The seed were sown in 7th and 3th of july of the two successive growing seasons 2011 and 2012. In the first and second seasons sunflower was preceded by wheat "Treticum aestivum, L.".

 

Hoeing was practiced before the first and second irrigation. The plant were thinned to secure one plant per hill after 10 days from planting other cultural practices for growing sunflower were conducted as recommended were, growth attributes agronomic characters, yield and its components oil% and oil yield/fed. were recorded from the two middle redges.

 

A- Growth characters

Five guarded plants, from each plot were taken at 30, 45 and 60 days after sowing (DAS). The following data were recorded for each sample.

  1. Leaf area (LA)/plant/(dm2)
  2. Dry matter accumulation (g/plant)
  3. Days to full flowering
  4. Plant height at harvest (cm)
  5. Stem diameter (cm)
  6. Head dimater (cm)

B- Yield and yield components

At harvest two guarded plants were taken from the 2nd and 3rd ridges in each plots to determine the following parameters:

  1. 100- seed weight (g).
  2. Seed yield (g/plant).
  3. Seed yield (kg/fed).

 

D- Oil% and oil yield/fed

Oil percentage was determined using duplicat seed sample each of about two grains. Seed samples were dried in oven at 85 °C to 90°C for 24 hours. After weighting the seed samples were subjected to a constant pressure of 20000 pounds/square inch using a carve laboratory press which was described and used by A. O. A. C. (1980).

 

Approximately 70% of the oil in the seed was extracted. The crushed seeds were then placed in avail with solvent petroleum ether stopper and allowed to stand a dry at 33°C. Two changes of solvent were applied at 24 hours intervals. Then the seed residue was dried for one hour. Then oven dried for 24 hour at 85°C to 90°C and weighted. The loss in weight of seeds removed by pressing and solvent extraction and oil% was then calculated as follows. In sample was calculated and then content was determined as follows

               Weight of oil

Oil %=                            × 100

             Weight of seed

Oil yield (kg)/fed: was determined by multiplying seed yield (kg/fed) by seed percentage.

 

All data collected were subjected to standard statistical analysis according to Gomez and Gomez (1984) using the computer program (IRRISaT). The treatment were compared using. Duncan's multiple range test (L.S.D.).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A- Growth Characters:

The data of leaf area/plant and dry matter accumulation g/plant at the three sampling dates of sunflower as affected by bio- organic and mineral nitrogen are presented in Table (2).

 

The data indicated that a significant effect of all sampling dates in both seasons. The highest values of leaf area/plant and dry matter accumulation produced from 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost in the two seasons. In addition effect on the dry matter/plant in the first simple for both seasons. Applying 10 kg N/fed, alone gave the lowest values for these characters. Also, the results revealed that nitrogen is necessary to more vegetative growth, hence the leaf area/plant and dry matter of sunflower continued to increase as the plant advanced in age until the last sampling data. These results may be due to the fact that nitrogen fertilizer is an essential element, which plays a prominent role in building newliving staff, increase in size of successive leaves which improved translocation of assimilates. The role of nitrogen fertilizer on structure of protein molecule, which necessary for biological activity and improvement of plant metabolism as well as growth of stem and leaves. In addition to compost intended to serve as soil amendment is applied in order to improve soil fertility (Namvar et al., 2010). Similar results were reported by Abou- Khadrah et al. (2002) and Aowas and Mohamed (2009).

 

Also, results presented in Table (3) show a significant response to bio- organic and mineral nitrogen fertilizer on (number of days to full flowering, plant height at harvest, stem and head diameter). Application of 20 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost + Cerealine recorded the highest plant height and stem diameter, as well as application 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost gave the highest values for days to full flowering and head diameter is in both seasons, while applying 10 kg N/fed, gave the lowest values of all the characters. Such increase in this characters due to apart of recommended mineral nitrogen + compost with biofertilizer synergistic effect on subsequent plant growth and cause bacterial development as Cerealine inoculants to gave biological N2- fixation, which improve plant growth and head diameter. Similar results were reported by Bassal (2003) and Dhanasekar and Dhandapani (2012).

 

B- Yield and its components:

Application of mixture of 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost were significantly increased all these characters i.e. 100- seed weight, seed yield, g/plant and seed yield, kg/fed during both seasons in comparison with the 10 kg N/fed, Table (4). It could be concluded that the lowest values come from fertilization with 10 kg N/fed. These findings might be the attributed to more adsorption of nutrition with reflect more growth substance more cell division and enlargement more of tissues and organs and plant elongation. Also, the nitrogen and compost may be increase the synthesis of endogenous photohormones which plays in formation of a big active root system allow more nutrients uptake. The previous results agree, more or less, with the finding of Abou- Khadrah et al. (2002), Bassal (2003) and El- Sadek (2005).

 

D- Seed oil and oil yield/fed: 

Data presented in Table (4) showed that there were significant differences, due all these treatments. The highest oil % and oil yield/fed were produced by applying 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost in both seasons while the lowest oil % obtained by 30 kg N/fed and oil yield/fed obtained by 10 kg N/fed respectively. This may be due to the increased of oil and oil yield. It was noted that the application of higher doses of nitrogen decrease oil yield/fed, the seed yield was increase to a level that may compensate for the reduction and oil content. Similar results were reported by Mohamed (2003) and zadah (2010).

 

Conclusion

High quantity and quality production of sunflower: Hehanthus annuus, L. cv. Sakha 53 were obtained at the applying of 20 kg N/fed + 30 m3 compost and 20 kg N/fed + 20 m3 compost + Cerealine. Sunflower "Helianthus annuus, L. cv. Sakha 53, can be grown under these treatments for their high seed yield and oil content under conditions of Sakha Agricultural Research Center or in other similar areas.

 

 

Table (2) : Leaf area/dm2 plant, dry matter accumulation (g/plant) as influenced by mineral organic and biofertilization  in 2011  and 2012 seasons

 

Treatments

Leaf area

Days after sowing

Dry matter accumulation

Days after sowing

2011

2012

2011

2012

30

45

60

30

45

60

30

45

60

30

45

60

F1:10Kg N/fed

14.42i

25.29b

53.58i

11.36b

21.74f

52.71i

22.69f

70.38b

113.97i

20.82g

69.29h

104.39i

F2: 20kg N/fed

17.49ef

32.98.d

65.28e

15.28d

30.06e

63.52e

30.16c

81.11e

124.24f

27.56e

76.24e

119.86e

F3:30kg N/fed

22.05b

37.75be

71.59b

19.89b

36.89b

69.98b

38.69a

86.48b

137.07b

35.17f

84.08ab

128.58b

F4: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost

15.93b

27.84g

55.69h

12.81g

24.13b

55.72b

24.21f

74.38g

119.06b

22.90ef

71.27g

108.93h

F5: 10kg N/fed+ 30m3 compost

17.76e

30.31e

59.76f

14.36c

27.48f

58.65f

26.63d

77.24f

122.81g

24.95d

74.21f

112.66f

F6: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Cerealine

17.19f

28.47f

57.32g

13.54f

25.33g

57.34g

25.43de

74.25g

120.37b

24.22de

72.24g

110.99g

F7: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost +  hizobacterine

16.67g

28.44f

56.21h

12.91g

24.84gh

56.79g

24.34ef

74.46g

119.43h

22.79f

71.27s

108.93h

F8: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost

19.46d

37.63c 

68.41d

17.98c

33.54d

68.47cd

34.15b

83.22d

129.59c

31.29b

80.26d

123.28d

F9: 20kg N/fed+ 30m3 compost

22.66a

41.59a

76.46a

20.95a

39.56a

73.89a

40.32a

89.46a

140.21a

36.04a

85.50a

131.38a

F10: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Cerealine

20.63c

38.59b

71.20b

19.99b

35.62c

69.37bc

35.29b

84.61c

135.44c

32.52d

83.05bc

125.95c

F11: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Rhizobacterine

20.22c

37.54c

69.29c

19.76b

33.83d

68.16d

34.78b

83.81c

133.01d

31.76b

81.65bc

123.65d

F test

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

* indicate P < 0.05 Means designated by the same letter within columns are not significant differences at 5% level  according     to Duncan's multiple range test.


Table (3) : Number of days to full flowers, plant height, stem and head diameter as influenced by mineral, organic

and biofertilization in 2011 and 2012 seasons

Treatments

Number of days to

Full flowering

Plant height at

Harvest (cm)

Stem diameter

(cm)

Head diameter

(cm)

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

F1:10Kg N/fed

55.00de

55.25d

177j

175.50j

2.20f

2.03b

17.65g

18.45f

F2: 20kg N/fed

56.50c

56.50c

194.33f

189.71e

2.80d

2.68e

21.80d

22.15de

F3:30kg N/fed

58.00ab

58.25ab

200.57b

195.53c

3.60ab

3.80ab

23.25ab

23.08ab

F4: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost

55.50d

55.75d

179.83i

177.80i

2.43e

2.25g

20.98f

21.68e

F5: 10kg N/fed+ 30m3 compost

56.50c

56.50c

182.10i

178.80b

2.70d

2.48f

21.55de

21.75e

F6: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Cerealine

55.75cd

56.00cd

184.57g

181.13f

2.63d

2.73e

21.45e

22.55cd

F7: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost + Rhizobacterine

56.00cd

56.25c

183.13b

179.83g

2.63d

2.52f

21.33e

22.00c

F8: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost

57.25bc

57.50b

196.97d

195.57c

2.98c

2.93d

22.13e

22.70bc

F9: 20kg N/fed+ 30m3 compost

58.50a

58.50a

195.27c

192.93d

3.45b

3.55c

23.52a

23.35a

F10: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Cerealine

57.50b

57.75b

201.60a

198.47a

3.70a

3.85a

23.25ab

23.15ab

F11: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Rhizobacterine

57.75b

58.00ab

198.63c

196.60b

3.50b

3.68c

23.05b

23.23a

F test

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

* indicate P < 0.05 Means designated by the same letter within columns are not significant differences at 5% level according

       to Duncan's multiple range test.

 

Table (4) : 100 seed weight (g), seed yield (g), seed yield (kg/fed), oil% and oil yield (kg/fed) as influenced by mineral, organic

                and biofertilization in 2011 and 2012 seasons

 

Treatments

100 seed weight

(g)

Seed yield

g/plant

Seed yield

(kg/fed)

Oil%

 

Oil yield

(kg/fed)

 

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

F1:10Kg N/fed

6.99e

6.47f

37.48h

36.20f

1311.10h

1266.49f

45.72b

44.25b

599.98b

560.42h

F2: 20kg N/fed

7.55de

7.39c

45.00f

43.60d

1574.37f

1525.39d

45.36b

43.40c

714.13f

662.02g

F3:30kg N/fed

8.61b

8.83b

54.70c

54.08c

1808.78c

1891.86c

42.25d

40.62e

773.25d

778.70

F4: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost

7.64de

7.41e

44.58fg

41.68e

1539.38fg

1458.22e

44.25c

44.20b

681.18g

644.54b

F5: 10kg N/fed+ 30m3 compost

7.81d

7.95d

46.42e

43.93d

1624.05e

1536.96d

45.95b

44.28b

746.25e

680.55f

F6: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Cerealine

8.61b

8.14d

46.28e

41.00d

1619.35e

1504.39d

44.28c

43.11c

716.96f

648.54gh

F7: 10kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost + Rhizobacterine

8.64b

8.47c

45.53ef

42.68e

1592.91ef

1493.20e

45.39b

44.06bc

725.02ef

658.35g

F8: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost

7.93ed

8.51bc

50.50d

53.70c

1766.76d

1877.75c

44.16c

42.35d

784.23d

795.65d

F9: 20kg N/fed+ 30m3 compost

9.88a

9.95a

59.78a

56.08a

2091.29a

1961.84a

47.46a

45.12a

953.15a

873.92

F10: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Cerealine

9.05b

8.78bc

57.27b

55.38b

2003.82b

1937.35b

44.27c

42.29d

925.23b

832.99c

F11: 20kg N/fed+ 20m3 compost+ Rhizobacterine

8.49bc

8.68bc

57.45b

55.08b

1999.45b

1926.85b

45.09c

44.20b

901.93c

850.51b

F test

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

* indicate P < 0.05 Means designated by the same letter within columns are not significant differences at 5% level  

according to Duncan's multiple range test.

References
A. O. A. C. (1980). Association of official Agricultural Chimsts. Officeal Methods of  Analytical of Official Analytical 13th Ed Washington DC., USA.

Abou- Khadrah, S. H., A. A. E. Mohamed, N. R. Gerges and Z. M. Diab (2002). Response of four sunflower hybrids to low nitrogen fertilizer levels and biofertilization. J. Agric. Res. Tanta, Univ., 28 (1): 105- 118.

Aowad, M. M. and A. A. Mohamed (2009). The effect  of bio- organic and mineral fertilization on productivity of sunflower seed and oil yield. J. Agric. Res., Kafr El- Sheikha Univ., 35 (4): 1013- 1028.

Awad, M. M. M. (2004). Effect of nitrogen fertilization farmyard manure and Biofertilizers on yield and yield components of some sunflowers hybreds in North Della region. Ph. D. thesis Agron. Dept. Fac. Agric. Kafr Sheikh. Tanta. Univ.

Bassal, S. A. A. (2003). Impact of tillage systems, Hill spacing and bio and chemical phosphate fertilization regimes on yield and its components of sunflower (Helianthers annuus, L) Zagazig J. Agric Res., 30 (3): 619- 934.

Dhanasekar, R. and R. Dhandapani (2012). Effect of Biofertilizers on the growth of Helianthus annuls. International J. of plant. Animal and Environ. Sci, 2 (4).

El- Sadek, A. N. A. M. (2005). Effect of some agronomic practices on sunflower productivity in New valley. M. Sc. Thesis Fac. of Agric. Ain Shams Univ.

El- Temssah, K. M. H. (2008). Effect of irrigation, mineral and biofertilization on yield and yield components of sunflower Ph. D. thesis. Fac. of Agric (Saba- Basha) Alex. Univ.

Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez (1984). Statistical procedures for Agricultural Reasarch. John Wiley and Sons. Ins., New York.

Henen, M. E. N. (2011). Response of some sunflower to water stress and biofertilization. Ph. D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric (Saba Basha) Alex. Univ.

Mohamed, A. A. E. (2003). Response of sunflower to phosphorine and Cerealine inoculation under low NP fertilizer levels, J. Agric. Res. Tanta Univ., 26 (2): 236- 249.

Namvar, A., T. Khandan and M. Shojaei (2012). Effect of bio and chemical nitrogen fertilizer on seed and oil yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus, L.) under different rates of plant density. Annals of biological Res., 3 (2): 1125- 1131.

Page, A. L., R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney (1982). Methods of soil analysis part 2- chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd Ed. Ass, A. Midition Wise USA.

Patra, P., B. K. Pati, G. K. Gosh, S. S. Mara and A. Saha (2013). Effect of Biofertilizers and sulphur on growth, yield and oil content of hybrid sunflower (Helianthus annuus, L.) in a typical lateritic. Soil. Doi. 2: 1-5.

Zadah,S. H. (2010). Effect of VA- mycorrhizal on growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus, L.) as different phosphors levels. Int. J. Chem and Biol. Engin., 3 (3): 159- 162.

Statistics
Article View: 144
PDF Download: 291
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.