Evaluation of Some Sugar Beet Varieties Under Sabahia and Nubaria Regions Conditions

Document Type : Research papers

Authors

1 Breed and genetic Dept., Sugar Crops Research Inst., ARC, Egypt.

2 Plant physiology and Chemistry Dept., Sugar Crops Research Inst., ARC, Egypt.

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Sabahia, and Nubaria regions during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons, to evaluate ten varieties of sugar beet under Sabahia and Nubaria conditions. The experiments were conducted in split plot design with three replications, where the main plots assigned by the two location (Sabahia and Nubaria), while the sub plots were occupied by the ten varieties of sugar beet (Charelston (V1), Gazella (V2), Heba (V3), Lilly (V4), Mammut (V5), Matros (V6), Nancy (V7), Oscarpoly (V8), Puma (V9), and Pyramidia (V10). The results revealed that there was significant difference between the two locations and the cultivated verieties for most of studied characters, whereas planted each of Pyramidia, Puma and Oscarpoly under Nubaria and Sabahia region getting the highest yield, yield components and quality of sugar beet crop. Other cultivars under this study could be employed as other sugar beet genetic resources with reasonable root and sugar yields in such sandy soil of the Nubaria region.

Keywords

References

AOAC. (1995). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition, AOAC International, Washington, DC.
Ahmad, S. and R. Awais (2011). Evaluation of sugar beet varieties for their adaptability in different soil and environmental conditions of Punjab. Final Report (2008-11) Agric. Linkages Program (ALP), National Agric. Res. Cen., Islamabad, Pakistan.
Chapman, H.D. and R.F. Pratt (1978). Methods analysis for soil, plant and water. Univ. of California Div. Agric. Sci., 16-38.
CoStat, Ver. 6.4 (2005). Cohort software798 light house Ave. PMB320, Monterey, CA93940, and USA.  email: info@cohort.com and Website: http://www.cohort.com/DownloadCoStatPart2.html
FAO (2016). Food Agric. Organization. www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
El- Sheikh, S. R. E., Khaled, K. A. M. and Enan, S. A. A. M. (2009). Evaluation of some sugar beet varieties under three harvesting dates. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 34 (3), 1559-1567.
Enan, S. A. A. M., S. R. E. El- Sheikh and K. A. M. Khaled (2009). Evaluation of some sugar beet varieties under different levels of N and Mo fertilization. J. Biol. Chem. Environ. Sci., 4 (1), 345-362.
Gobarah, M.E. and B.B. Mekki (2005). Influence of boron application on yield and juice quality of some sugar beet cultivars grown under saline soil conditions. J. Appl. Sci. Res.,1(5): 373-379.
Gomez, K.N. and A.A. Gomez (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2nd ed., 68 P.
Hozayn, M., A.A. Abd El-Monem and A.A. Bakery (2013). Screening of some exotic sugar beet cultivars grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil for yield and sugar quality traits. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9(3): 2213-2222.
Ismail, A.M.A (2002). Evaluation of some sugar beet varieties under different nitrogen levels in El-Fayium Egypt. J. Appl. Sci., 17: 75-85.
Khan, D., I. Khan, P. Khan and G. Rehman (2004). Sugar beet cultivation in the southern parts of NWFP. Pakistan Sugar J., 19: 19-24.
Korayem, A.M., H.M.S. El-Bassiouny, A.A. Abd El-Monem and M.M.M. Mohamed (2012). Physiological and biochemical changes in different sugar beet genotypes infected with root-knot nematode. Acta Physiologia Plantaram, 34: 1847-1861.
Mohamed, H. Y. and M.A.T. Yasin (2013). Response of some sugar beet varieties to harvesting dates and foliar application of boron and zinc in sandy soils. Egypt. J. Agron., 35(2):227- 252.
Nasr, M.I. and A.M. Abd El-Razek (2008). Sugar beet performance under newly reclaimed soil conditions of Sinai, Egypt. Sugar Technology, 10(3): 210-218.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics