• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 30 (2025)
Volume Volume 29 (2024)
Volume Volume 28 (2023)
Volume Volume 27 (2022)
Volume Volume 26 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 25 (2020)
Volume Volume 24 (2019)
Volume Volume 23 (2018)
Volume Volume 22 (2017)
Volume Volume 21 (2016)
Volume Volume 20 (2015)
Volume Volume 19 (2014)
Malek, S., Ali Abido, A., khalil, G., Ziton, M., Gabel, A. (2021). Yield And Quality Of Potato As Affected By Foliar Spraying Of Boron And Cytokinin. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 26(2), 86-99. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.177195
Smaher Malek; Ali Ibrahim Ali Abido; Gamal Abdel-Nasser khalil; Mohamed Ziton; Ali Adnan Gabel. "Yield And Quality Of Potato As Affected By Foliar Spraying Of Boron And Cytokinin". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 26, 2, 2021, 86-99. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.177195
Malek, S., Ali Abido, A., khalil, G., Ziton, M., Gabel, A. (2021). 'Yield And Quality Of Potato As Affected By Foliar Spraying Of Boron And Cytokinin', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 26(2), pp. 86-99. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.177195
Malek, S., Ali Abido, A., khalil, G., Ziton, M., Gabel, A. Yield And Quality Of Potato As Affected By Foliar Spraying Of Boron And Cytokinin. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2021; 26(2): 86-99. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.177195

Yield And Quality Of Potato As Affected By Foliar Spraying Of Boron And Cytokinin

Article 6, Volume 26, Issue 2 - Serial Number 99, June 2021, Page 86-99  XML PDF (511.22 K)
Document Type: Research papers
DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.177195
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Smaher Malek1; Ali Ibrahim Ali Abido1; Gamal Abdel-Nasser khalil2; Mohamed Ziton3; Ali Adnan Gabel1
1Plant Production Department . Faculty of Agriculture Saba Basha, Alexandria University
2Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Department . Faculty of Agriculture Saba Basha, Alexandria University
3Food Sciences Department Faculty of Agriculture Saba Basha, Alexandria University
Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out during the summer seasons of  2018 and 2019, at the Experimental Farm of  Faculty of Agriculture (Saba- Basha) at Abees area, Alexandria University, Egypt, to study the effect of foliar application of the various levels of both BA as cytokinin and Boron on vegetative growth, yield, and quality of ' Hermes' potato cultivar.
Cut seedy explants were, approximately, 40 g in weight and each seedy explant contained 2 eyes planted on the 20th February du  ring both seasons. Cutting seeds were planted under a drip irrigation system at 30 cm apart in the row and 0.8 m width in dry soil then irrigated. The experimental plot consisted of two rows with 10.00 m long and 0.80 m width; making an area of 16.00 m2.
                The experimental design was a split-plot- design in a randomized complete block. The main plots allocated for boron levels (0, 10, 20, and 30 mg l-1). Whereas, the sub-plots were occupied by 6-benzyl adenine levels (0, 10, 20, and 30 mg l-1).
The results indicated that foliar application of boron at 30 mg l-1 gave the highest average values of No. of tubers per plant, tuber fresh weight (g plant-1), No. of tubers per 10 kg, total yield per plant (g) as well as total yield; (ton fed-1) compared to control plants during both seasons of the study. On the other side, foliar application of cytokinin at 30 mg l-1 recorded the highest of No. of tubers per plant, tuber fresh weight (g plant-1), No. of tubers per 10 kg, total yield per plant (g) as well as total yield; (ton fed-1 as compared with control treatment and the other treatments, during both seasons.
                Results of this characteristic revealed that applying boron at 30 mg l-1 increased significantly the potato chips defect (%), tuber firmness, tuber dry weight (%), and specific gravity compared to the control treatment during both seasons. Besides, applying cytokinin at 30 mg l-1, produced higher potato chips defect (%), tuber firmness, tuber dry weight (%), and specific gravity as compared with untreated plants (control), during both seasons.
Foliar application of boron at 30 mg l-1 recorded the best results of tubers quality content i.e., average values of starch, tuber sugars, TSS, and ascorbic acid of potato tuber as compared with control treatments, during both seasons, also, potato plants treated with 30 mg l-1 of cytokinin gave the highest mean values of the average values of starch, tuber sugars, TSS and ascorbic acid of potato tuber as compared with control treatments, during both seasons
Keywords
foliar application; potato crop; boron spray; cytokinin; tuber yield; tuber quality
Main Subjects
Crop genetics and breeding; Crops and quality
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

 

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) has an important economic role in Egypt, because of its role in the enrichment of the Egyptian economy by exporting potatoes. However, Egypt imports, annually, from 50000 to 55000 tons of potato seeds from the northwest European countries, particularly from Netherland and England planted in the summer season in January up to the middle of February. The fall and the winter plantation seeded with the stored seeds from the summer crop production, besides, a part of the summer crop exported to European and Arabian countries, and the rest of the crop is stored to supply the local market for consumption.  

Cytokinins are plant hormones (upon biosynthesized endogenously), and plant growth regulators (upon biosynthesized exogenously), briefly, both promoting cell division and differentiation. Since the discovery of the first cytokinin, kinetin, by Miller et al. (1955), the number of chemicals compatible with the definition of cytokinins has grown to include a large array of natural and synthetic compounds, adenine and phenyl urea derivatives. The phenyl ureas constitute a group of synthetic cytokinins, some of which are highly active, e.g. CPPU [N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl) -N'- phenylurea] (Takahashi et al., 1978) and thidiazuron (Mok et al., 1982).

Boron (B) also plays an important role in cell wall synthesis, sugar transport, cell division, cell development, auxin metabolism, good pollination and fruit set, seed development, synthesis of amino acids and proteins, nodule formation in legumes, and regulation of carbohydrate metabolism (El-Dissoky and Abdel-Kadar, 2013).

The availability of boron in soil affected considerably by soil pH. At low pH, most of the boron compounds are soluble but in the case of sandy soils having low pH, B is lost down the profile by leaching if rainfall is high. It occurs mostly in the organic matter in the surface soil and down the profile B content decreases. Under drought conditions, the deficiency of boron observed due to the lower availability of B in sub-soils (Prasad et al., 2014).

Therefore, the present research was conducted to 1) evaluate the potato cultivar (Hermes) for tuber productivity and quality, 2) find out the optimal doses of cytokinin (6-BA) and boron levels as foliar applications to improve yields and economical returns to potato growers, and 3) examine the interaction effect between 6-BA and boron levels.

 

 

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Experimental site and arrangement:

Two field experiments were carried out during the summer seasons of  2018 and 2019, at the Experimental Farm of  Faculty of Agriculture (Saba- Basha) at Abees region, Alexandria University, Egypt, to study the effect of foliar application of the various levels of both BA (as cytokinin) and Boron on vegetative growth, yield, and quality of ' Hermes' potato cultivar.

                Before planting, random soil samples of 0-30 cm depth from different places of the planting field were collected and analyzed for some important chemical and physical properties as given in Table (1) according to the methods reported by Carter and Gregorich (2008).

2.2. Potato cultivation

The plant material of this investigation was Hermes cultivar which was exported from Scotland. Cut seedy explants were, approximately, 40 g in weight and each seedy explant contained  2 eyes planted on the 20th February during both seasons. Cutting seeds were planted under a drip irrigation system at 30 cm apart in the row and 0.8 m width in dry soil then irrigated. The experimental plot consisted of two rows with 10.00 m long and 0.80 m width; making an area of 16.00 m2.


 

Table (1). Some physical and chemical properties of the experimental site during both seasons of the experimentation (2018 and 2019).

Soil properties

Season

2018

2019

Mechanical Analysis:

 

 

Clay (%)

50.68

50.30

Silt (%)

10.00

10.70

Sand (%)

39.32

40.00

Textural class

Clay

Clay

pH (1:2 water suspension)

8.10

8.20

EC at 25°C (dS/m)

1.15

1.20

Soluble cations (1:5, soil: water extract) meq/l

 

 

Ca++

3.08

3.02

Mg++

3.00

3.12

K+

0.60

0.65

Na+

4.65

5.01

Soluble anions (1:5, soil: water extract) meq/l

 

 

HCO3-

1.91

2.11

Cl-

8.41

9.15

SO4--

1.03

1.25

CaCO3 (%)

31.57

31.60

Available N (mg/kg soil)

98.23

95.50

Available P (mg/kg soil)

18.00

18.25

Available K (mg/kg soil)

1000

1050

 

 


2.3. Theexperimental treatments and design

                Treatments consisted of two factors (two independent variables) as a foliar applicants, i.e.; four concentrations of Boron (B) as boric acid (H3BO3) [MW= 61.83g mol-1] contained 17% B i.e. 0 (control), 10, 20 and 30 mg.l-1 and four concentrations of synthetic Cytokinin or 6-benzyl adenine (BA) [MW= 225.255 g mol-1, C12H11N5] as 0 (control), 10, 20 and 30 mg.l-1 separately and in combinations. Control plants sprayed with distilled water. The BA and Boric acid purchased from El Gomhouria Company for Chemicals, Alexandria, Egypt. All precautions and accuracy followed during weighing, dissolving, spraying of both independent variables. Foliar application of both B and BA was done afternoon during both seasons, to avoid deterioration caused by the effect of higher temperatures and ambient atmosphere on the applied items, at the time of application. Both conducted experiments were factorial experiments layout in a randomized complete block design (RCBD), with four replicates. Each replicate included 16 treatments. All determined treatments distributed randomly within each block. Potato plants sprayed with the allocated or assigned treatments twice during the growing seasons, the first one was at 60 days (at the stage when the plants had approximately 12-15 leaves) after planting. The second application was 15 days after the first one (or when plants had approximately 25-30 leaves). The recommended agricultural practices for commercial potato production followed. Harvesting accomplished after 120 days of planting during both years.

2.4. Experimental data collections

                Ten plants from each treatment in each replication taken randomly and tagged for records of the total yield and tubers quality parameters.

2.4.1. Yield and its component measurements

1.4.1.1. Number of tubers per plant was determined just after harvesting time (120 days from planting) using the average number of tubers of 10 plants.

2.4.1.2. Average tuber fresh weight (g) was determined immediately after harvesting, by dividing the weight of tubers yield by tuber's number of 10 plants.

2.4.1.3. The number of tubers/10 kg, was determined by taking a random sample of 10 kg of tubers from the yield of each treatment and then counted. The number of potato tubers / 10 kg is a character of the processing companies to receive potatoes. The accepted range of the number of tubers / 10 kg is 72 – 112 tubers (Frito Lay Company, 1999), more than these numbers mean small tubers and consequently small slides of chips that reduce the chip quality. If it was less than that range it means the presence of over-size large tubers, which may comprise hallow hart and cracks. Such defects may cause the rejection of the chips after processing. 

2.4.1.4. Average tuber yield per plant (g/plant) calculated using the average weight of tubers of 10 plants.

2.4.1.5. Total tubers yield per feddan (ton/fed) was determined via the yield of the plot, which weighed, then converted into tons per feddan.

2.4.2. Tubers quality:

2.4.2.1. Chips defect evaluation, was calculated by showing the size limits (1/2 cm) for sugar browning and defects using chip – check chart method to determine the internal, external and undesirable color defects and dividing the defects into three categories; the first green from 0 – 8 % defects are acceptable potato chips, the second yellow 8 – 15 % defects are acceptable potato chips but with discarding the percentage over 8 % and the third red > 15 % defects are rejected and not suitable for processing according to (Frito Lay Company, 1999).

2.4.2.2. Firmness measure (Newton “N”): It was measured using UC. Firmness-tester (Li and Kader, 1999).

Pound-force (lbs) x 4.448 = Newton (N).

2.4.2.3. Tubers dry weight (%) was carried out via randomly tuber samples of 100 g of fresh weight which were dried in an electrical oven at 70˚ C till the constant weight, then the obtained value of tuber dry weight was calculated as a percentage.   

2.4.2.4. Total soluble solids (TSS %), or degrees Brix (Bx°) is numerically equal to the percentage of sugar and others dissolved in a solution. This scale used in the food industry for measuring the approximate amount of sugars in fruit juices. Therefore, a solution that is 25 degrees Brix has 25g of sugar per 100 g of solution (Majiid et al., 2011). It estimated in the juice of the fresh tubers using a hand refractometer according to AOAC (1992). The calibration of the device done with a drop of distilled water. The reading adjusted to Brix° using the small setscrew on the back. Verifying the accuracy achieved with a drop of 5 or 10% sucrose solution (5 grams' sugar in 100 ml of distilled water). Prism rinsed between samples with distilled water and dried with soft paper tissues. Ten readings recorded per treatment.

2.4.2.5. Vitamin C (Ascorbic acid), thetubers’ vitamin C was measured by titration with iodide potassium according to the method of Ranganna (1986) and calculated as mg vitamin C /100 g, f.w.

2.4.2.6.  Specific gravity, was determined using the method described by Dinesh et al. (2005) and calculated from the equation of Smith (1977) as follows:

 

 

 

    Specific gravity =

                 Weight of tuber in air

________________________________________________________________

Weight of tuber in the air - Weight of tuber underwater


2.4.3. Starch, reducing, non-reducing and total


sugars (% D.W.) were determined for each tuber, sample according to the method described by Malik and Singh (1980).

2.4.4. Nutrients content of tubers (N, P, K, and B):

2.4.4.1. Tuber nitrogen content (%) was determined in digested plant material colorimetrically by Nessler’s method (Chapman and Pratt, 1978) using Nessler solution (35 g KI /100 ml, D.W. + 20 g HgCl2 /500 ml, D.W + 120 g NaOH/250 ml, D.W.).

2.4.4.2. Tuber phosphorus content (%) was determined calorimetrically using the vanadate method from the solution obtained through wet digestion as described by Singh et al. (2005).

2.4.4.3. Tuber potassium content (%) was measured using a flame photometer from the solution obtained through wet digestion as described by Singh et al. (2005).

2.4.4.4. Tuber boron content (%) was determined colorimetrically by the Azomethine-H method at a spectrophotometer at wavelength 420 nm (Wolf, 1971).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

                All obtained data of the present study were, statistically, analyzed according to the design used by the MSTAT-C computer software program (Bricker, 1991) and were tested by analysis of variance. The revised least significant difference test at 0.05 level of probability was used to compare the differences among the means of the various treatment combinations as illustrated by Duncan (1955) and Gomez and Gomez (1984).

 

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

All treatments under study significantly (p≤0.05) affected with the foliar application of Boron and BA as cytokinin, and their interactions during 2018 and 2019 growing seasons of the study.

Results presented under four main headings as follows: tuber yield characters, tuber physical quality characters, tuber chemical quality characters, and tubers N, P, K, and B contents.

3.1. Tuber yield characters

Yield components of potato tubers in the expression of No. of tubers per plant, tuber fresh weight (g plant -1), No. of tubers per 10 kg, total yield per plant (g) as well as total yield (ton fed-1) as affected by foliar application with BA as cytokinin, boron and their interaction are presented in Table (2) for both seasons. Statistical analysis showed that using B at 30 mg l-1 was superior and associated with the highest mean values of all the aforementioned traits compared to the control treatment. For example the increasing of tuber fresh weight was (19.37 and 18.34%) and for total yield, ton/fed was (107.29 and 123.25%), respectively in 2018 and 2019 growing seasons. The same trend realized for the other yield components during both seasons.

This positive effect of B in tuber yield parameters due to the low concentrations of B availability and low organic matter % in the soil before planting as shown in Table (1), in addition to the important roles of B in the plant (cell division, sugar transport, synthesis of amino acids and proteins,….etc). Moreover, these results are following that obtained by Awadand Mansour (2007); El-Dissoky and Abdel-Kadar (2013), and Muthanna et al. (2017).

Concerning the effect of foliar application of BA as cytokinin on the mean values of yield and yield components of potato plants,  data of Table (2) showed significant increases in all parameters under the study for the plants treated with any levels compared with the untreated plants, and the mean values of such traits still over than that obtained from the control treatment. In this respect,  the highest mean values (8.67, 115.67, 87.24, 1002.86, and 16.71) were realized for the treatment of 30 mg.l-1 cytokinin, while the lowest one (5.75, 99.66, 100.56, 573.05, and 9.55) were recorded for the untreated plants for No. of tubers per plant, tuber fresh weight (g plant -1), No. of tubers per 10 kg, yield per plant (g), and total yield (ton fed-1), respectively during the season of 2018. The same trend obtained in the season of 2019

 

.

 

Table (2). Average values of some yield characters of potato plants cv. 'Hermes' as affected by foliar application with Boron (B), Cytokinin (6-BA) and their combinations during the summer seasons of 2018 and 2019 .

Treatments

No. of tubers/plant

Tuber fresh weight (g)

Number of tubers/ 10 kg.

Yield/plant (g)

Total yield (ton/fed)

 

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

 

Main effect of B (mg l-1)

 

 

 

 

Control

4.75c

5.08c

95.24d

85.88d

105.00a

116.49a

452.39c

436.27c

7.54c

7.27c

 

10

7.58b

8.92b

109.70c

98.33c

91.59b

102.07b

831.53b

877.10b

13.86b

14.62b

 

20

7.92ab

9.33ab

111.50b

99.88b

90.09c

100.46c

883.08ab

931.88ab

14.72ab

15.53ab

 

30

8.25a

9.58a

113.69a

101.63a

88.33d

98.75d

937.94a

973.62a

15.63a

16.23a

 

Main effect of 6-BA  (mg.l-1  )

 

 

 

Control

5.75b

6.50c

99.66d

89.79d

100.56a

111.59a

573.05d

583.64d

9.55d

9.73d

 

10

6.42b

7.83b

104.87c

94.58c

95.71b

106.11b

673.27c

740.56c

11.22c

12.34c

 

20

7.67a

9.00a

109.93b

98.61b

91.55c

101.93c

843.16b

887.49b

14.05b

14.79b

 

30

8.67a

9.58a

115.67a

102.73a

87.24d

98.15d

1002.86a

984.15a

16.71a

16.40a

 

Interaction  effects

 

B (mg l-1)

6-BA ( mg l-1 )

Control

Control

4.00i

4.33i

92.53n

83.41l

108.09a

119.91a

370.12k

361.17k

6.17k

6.02k

 

10

4.33i

4.67i

94.76n

85.37kl

105.54b

117.15b

410.31k

398.68k

6.84k

6.64k

 

20

5.00hi

5.33hi

95.64mn

87.11jk

104.57b

114.82c

478.20kl

464.30jk

7.97jk

7.74jk

 

30

5.67gh

6.00gh

98.03lm

87.65j

102.02c

114.10c

555.83ij

525.90ij

9.26ij

8.76ij

 

10

Control

6.00fgh

6.67fg

100.10kl

90.15i

99.91cd

110.93d

600.60hij

601.30hi

10.01hij

10.02hi

 

10

7.00def

8.33de

106.42hi

96.14g

94.02fg

104.02f

744.94fg

800.85fg

12.42fg

13.35fg

 

20

8.00cd

10.00abc

112.59ef

101.27e

88.83ij

98.76h

900.72de

1012.70cd

15.01de

16.88cd

 

30

9.33ab

10.67a

119.68bc

105.75bc

83.58lm

94.57jk

1116.61abc

1128.35abc

18.61abc

18.81abc

 

20

Control

6.33efg

7.33ef

101.78jk

92.16h

98.25de

108.51e

644.27ghi

675.53h

10.74ghi

11.26h

 

10

7.00def

9.00cd

108.05gh

97.59fg

92.57gh

102.48fg

756.35fg

878.31ef

12.61fg

14.64ef

 

20

8.67bc

10.33ab

114.93de

102.17de

87.01jk

97.88hi

996.44cd

1055.42bc

16.61cd

17.59bc

 

30

9.67ab

10.67a

121.23ab

107.61b

82.52mn

92.94k

1172.29ab

1148.20ab

19.54ab

19.14ab

 

30

Control

6.67efg

7.67ef

104.21ij

93.46h

95.98ef

107.00e

695.08fgh

716.84gh

11.58fgh

11.95gh

 

10

7.33de

9.33bcd

110.25fg

99.24f

90.71hi

100.77g

808.13ef

925.91de

13.47ef

15.43de

 

20

9.00abc

10.33ab

116.58cd

103.90cd

85.79kl

96.26ij

1049.22bc

1073.29bc

17.94bc

17.89bc

 

30

10.00a

11.00a

123.72a

109.93a

80.83n

90.98l

1237.20a

1209.23a

20.62a

20.15a

 

- Values having the same alphabetical letter (s) in common, within each column, do not significantly differ, using the revised L.S.D. test at 0.05 level of probability.

 

 

The present results are in agreement with those obtained by several authors (Roumeliotis et al., 2012; Kolachevskaya et al., 2015 and 2017) who declare that cytokinin can accelerates and improves potato tuberization. In addition, Liu and Xie (2001) declared that various concentrations of cytokinin increased the size and weight of mini-tuber potato. The results also in agreement with those obtained by El-Shraiy and Hegazi (2010) who reported that the highest mean values of tubers fresh and dry weights, obtained by CPPU as cytokinin at 20-ppm treatment, which led to an increase in yield values. In the same arrangement, Njogu et al. (2015) reported that an increase in the level of cytokinin as BA, led to, significant, increase in the number of tubers per plant and yield (ton/ha).

The interaction effect between boron and cytokinin was significant in both seasons (Table 2). Spraying both boron and cytokinin at 30 mg l-1, resulted in the highest mean values of no. of tuber/plant, tuber fresh weight, no. of tuber/10 kg, yield/plant, and total yield (ton/fed) in both seasons.

3.2. Tuber physical quality characters

Data in Table (3) indicated the quality of the tubers, which, were expressed as potato chips defect (%), tuber firmness, tuber dry weight (%), and specific gravity as affected by foliar application with boron, BA as cytokinin, and their interactions in the growing seasons of 2018 and 2019.

Table (3) illustrated the effect of boron as a foliar application on the tuber physical quality characters as potato chips defect (%), tuber firmness, tuber dry weight (%), and specific gravity. Foliar application of boron increased significantly all tuber morphological parameters with increasing boron levels. All traits recorded a highly significant increase over control treatment and the highest mean values achieved at 30 mg.l-1 from boron. The rate of increase was 85.79, 17.09, 14.18, and 2.03% for potato chips defect (%), tuber firmness (N/mm), tuber dry weight (%), and specific gravity, respectively during the season of 2018.  The same trend obtained in the season of 2019.The enhanced dry matter production may attribute to the greater accumulation of photosynthesis products by vegetative parts. These effects of boron foliar spray on the previous parameters of potato quality may refer to the role of boron on sugar transport to parts of storage (tubers), also to its role in the synthesis of proteins and regulation of carbohydrate metabolism. These results are following that obtained by those El-Banna and Abd El-Salam (2005), Awadand Mansour (2007), El-Dissoky and Abdel-Kadar (2013). All of them studied the effect of boron on potato plant and they found that the quality of potato tuber parameters (i.e. dry matter, specific gravity, and tuber firmness) significantly increased with foliar B application

 

 

 

 


Table (3).  Average values of some quality determination of potato tubers cv. 'Hermes' characteristics as affected by foliar application with Boron (B), Cytokinin (6-BA) and their combinations during the summer seasons of 2018 and 2019.

Treatments

Potato chips defect (%)

Tuber firmness (N/mm)

Tuber dry matter (%)

Specific gravity

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

Main effect of B (mg l-1)

Control

5.70c

5.73c

11.82b

11.74b

14.95d

17.32d

1.034d

1.048c

10

9.59b

9.94b

11.77b

11.71b

16.62c

19.82c

1.051c

1.062b

20

10.84a

10.94a

12.18b

12.13b

16.85b

20.17b

1.053b

1.067a

30

10.59a

10.94a

13.84a

13.82a

17.07a

20.59a

1.055a

1.069a

main effect of 6-BA (mg l-1)

 

 

Control

7.09c

7.14c

11.32c

11.27c

15.50d

18.16d

1.038d

1.054c

10

8.09c

8.40bc

12.08b

12.04b

16.12c

19.06c

1.045c

1.060b

20

9.87b

9.94b

12.42b

12.34b

16.65b

19.91b

1.051b

1.065a

30

11.68a

12.09a

13.79a

13.75a

17.22a

20.76a

1.058a

1.067a

Interaction effects

B (mg l-1)

6-BA ( mg l-1 )

Control

Control

3.67g

3.81h

10.47gh

10.30gh

14.55n

16.86p

1.029j

1.045i

10

5.67fg

5.58gh

11.33fg

11.25fg

14.85m

17.23o

1.033i

1.048i

20

6.57ef

6.63fg

11.40fg

11.30fg

15.08l

17.44n

1.035i

1.049hi

30

6.90ef

6.91e-g

14.07ab

14.10ab

15.34k

17.76m

1.038h

1.051ghi

10

Control

7.87d-f

7.97d-g

10.27h

10.25h

15.65j

18.21l

1.039h

1.055gh

10

8.70de

9.23c-e

11.67ef

11.60ef

16.24h

19.34i

1.046f

1.062ef

20

9.57cd

9.72cd

11.80ef

11.70ef

16.94f

20.35f

1.054de

1.068cde

30

12.20b

12.85b

13.33bcd

13.30bcd

17.63c

21.37c

1.063b

1.064ef

20

Control

8.40de

8.38d-f

11.53f

11.50f

15.84i

18.55k

1.042g

1.057fg

10

9.00de

9.39c-e

11.93ef

11.90ef

16.55g

19.64h

1.048f

1.065de

20

11.67bc

11.70bc

12.60de

12.50de

17.13e

20.74e

1.056cd

1.071bcd

30

14.30a

14.29a

12.67de

12.60de

17.86b

21.74b

1.064ab

1.076ab

30

Control

8.40de

8.38d-f

13.00cd

13.01cd

15.96i

19.03j

1.043g

1.058fg

10

9.00de

9.39c-e

13.40bcd

13.42bcd

16.83f

20.05g

1.052e

1.066de

20

11.67bc

11.70bc

13.87bc

13.86bc

17.44d

21.12d

1.058c

1.073abc

30

13.30a

14.29a

15.07a

15.00a

18.06a

22.16a

1.066a

1.079a

- Values having the same alphabetical letter (s) in common, within each column, do not significantly differ, using the revised L.S.D. test at 0.05 level of probability.

 

Data presented in Table (3) indicated that foliar application with BA as cytokinin gave higher values for previous parameters than those obtained for the untreated plants. The highest mean values obtained with the treatment of 30 mg.l-1 cytokinin. Comparing with the control treatment, which recorded the lowest values. The highest value was (11.68, 13.79, 17.22, and 1.058) for potato chips defect (%), tuber firmness, tuber dry weight (%), and specific gravity, respectively during both seasons.

As for the interaction between various concentrations of both variables under the study, the results tabulated in Table (3) demonstrated that the treated plants with 30 mg.l-1 boron combined with 30 mg.l-1 BA, showed the highest mean values for all characters (i.e. potato chips defect (%), tuber firmness, tuber dry weight (%), and specific gravity) compared to the other treatments during both seasons of the study. Potato chips defect (%) recorded 13.30 and 14.29%, tuber firmness recorded 15.07 and 15.00N/mm, tuber dry matter recorded 18.06 and 22.16%, and specific gravity were 1.066 and 1.079 during both seasons.

3.3. Tuber chemical quality characteristics

The comparison among the means of the various combined treatments of boron and BA as shown in Table (4) has reflected significant differences between the average values of starch, tuber sugars, TSS, and ascorbic acid of potato tuber during both seasons of 2018 and 2019.

Regarding the effect of foliar application of boron, the data in Table (4) revealed that the addition of all levels significantly increased the mean values of starch, tuber sugars, TSS, and ascorbic acid in potato tubers as compared to the control treatment. In other words; the highest values (42.82 and 45.29%) for starch, (2.82 and 3.12%) for reducing sugar, (4.30 and 4.12%) for non-reducing sugar, (7.12 and 7.24%) for total sugars, (7.48 and 7.59%) for TSS%  and (19.62 and 21.61 mg/100g) for ascorbic acid, respectively during 2018 and 2019 seasons  realized for the 30 mg.l-1. In the plant, boron plays a major role in the translocation and production of sugars. In the presence of boron, simple organic sugars (Glucose 1-P) will form carbohydrates and complex sugar molecules. In the absence of boron, these simple sugars will form phenols (Quinone phenols), which will accumulate, attract insects and increase disease pressure. When boron is deficient in tissue cambial cells cease to divide but cell elongation continues in growing zones, and as a result, phloem and xylem cells are displaced from their original position so which will leads to the inactivation of vascular tissue. Inactivation of phloem cells leads to a failure of translocation of carbohydrates and sugars to tubers. These results are in agreement with Manjunath et al. (2018), who indicated that using boron increased reducing, non-reducing, total sugar and TSS%.

 

 

 

Table (4).  Average values of some quality determination of potato tubers cv. 'Hermes' characteristics as affected by foliar application with Boron (B), Cytokinin (6-BA) and their combinations during the summer seasons of 2018 and 2019.

Treatments

Tuber quality

Starch

Reducing sugars

Non-reducing sugars

 Total sugars

TSS %

Ascorbic acid (mg/100g )

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

 

 

 

 

B mg.l-1 (main effect)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

40.28d

41.73d

2.10d

2.29d

3.73d

3.81c

5.83d

6.10d

6.57d

6.77d

17.82d

18.96d

10

42.18c

44.50c

2.67c

2.93c

4.16c

4.03b

6.83c

6.97c

7.25c

7.34c

19.21c

21.06c

20

42.50b

44.93b

2.74b

3.00b

4.24b

4.06b

6.98b

7.06b

7.40b

7.47b

19.42b

21.34b

30

42.82a

45.29a

2.82a

3.12a

4.30a

4.12a

7.12a

7.24a

7.48a

7.59a

19.62a

21.61a

6-BA  mg.l-1 (main effect)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

40.87d

42.63d

2.29d

2.47d

3.88d

3.90d

6.16d

6.37d

6.97c

7.18c

18.26d

19.63d

10

41.70c

43.60c

2.48c

2.72c

4.05c

3.95c

6.53c

6.68c

7.04b

7.24c

18.74c

20.41c

20

42.22b

44.60b

2.68b

2.96b

4.21b

4.04b

6.89b

6.99b

7.32a

7.52b

19.29b

21.12b

30

42.99a

45.61a

2.89a

3.20a

4.30a

4.13a

7.19a

7.33a

7.36a

7.59a

19.78a

21.81a

Interaction effects

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B (mg.l-1)

6-BA ( mg.l-1 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

Control

39.76l

41.13p

1.99o

2.14m

3.63l

3.76j

5.62o

5.90o

6.48l

6.72o

17.55o

18.16p

10

40.35k

41.52o

2.06n

2.23l

3.71kl

3.78ij

5.77n

6.00n

6.54k

6.76o

17.71n

18.96o

20

40.34k

41.93n

2.14m

2.35k

3.76jk

3.84hi

5.90m

6.19m

6.57k

6.84n

17.92m

19.21n

30

40.65jk

42.33m

2.22l

2.44j

3.83jk

3.85h

6.04l

6.29l

6.68j

6.90m

18.11l

19.51m

10

Control

40.91j

42.73l

2.33k

2.50ij

3.88i

3.91gh

6.20k

6.41k

6.97de

7.20l

18.29k

19.84l

10

41.85h

43.93i

2.54i

2.80g

4.10fg

4.00def

6.64h

6.80i

7.10h

7.25k

18.88h

20.61i

20

42.55ef

45.09f

2.78f

3.08e

4.28cd

4.06cd

7.06e

7.14f

7.48de

7.60f

19.57e

21.48f

30

43.43bc

46.24c

3.03c

3.37c

4.40b

4.15b

7.43c

7.51c

7.45e

7.69e

20.09c

22.31c

20

Control

41.25i

43.13k

2.37k

2.53i

3.97h

3.94fg

6.34j

6.47k

7.23g

7.32j

18.51j

20.13k

10

42.17g

44.33h

2.62h

2.87g

4.16ef

4.00def

6.78g

6.88h

7.21g

7.39i

19.09g

20.89h

20

42.86de

45.53e

2.87e

3.15e

4.37bc

4.12bc

7.24d

7.27e

7.60bc

7.75d

19.79d

21.77e

30

43.70b

46.73b

3.11b

3.45b

4.46ab

4.19b

7.57b

7.63b

7.54cd

7.80c

20.27b

22.57b

30

Control

41.55ef

43.52j

2.46j

2.70h

4.02gh

3.97efg

6.48i

6.68j

7.18g

7.47h

18.68i

20.37j

10

42.42fg

44.64g

2.70g

2.99f

4.23de

4.03de

6.94f

7.02g

7.30f

7.54g

19.28f

21.18g

20

43.13cd

45.86d

2.93d

3.26d

4.41b

4.12bc

7.35c

7.38d

7.64b

7.88b

19.89d

22.04d

30

44.17a

47.13a

3.20a

3.53a

4.51a

4.35a

7.71a

7.88a

7.75a

7.95a

20.64a

22.85a

- Values having the same alphabetical letter (s) in common, within each column, do not significantly differ, using the revised L.S.D. test at 0.05 level of probability.

 

Data in Table (4) detected that all treatments had a pronounced positive effect on the mean values on tuber quality under investigation as compared to the untreated plants. All traits increased with increasing levels of BA until to 30 mg.l-1. Foliar application of boron at 30 mg.l-1,recordedthe highest mean values offer mentioned tuber chemical parameters during both seasons. These results are following that obtained byRosin et al. (2003) on potato,who indicated that increasing of cytokinin concentration owing to antisense suppression of potato box gene, brought about the higher increments of starch accumulation. In addition, El-Shraiy and Hegazi (2010) reported that cytokinin at 10 ppm treatment, significantly increased the total soluble sugars of potato tubers. Moreover, On tomato, Mousawinejad et al. (2014) reported that foliar application of CPPU as cytokinin at 10 and 20 mg l-1 on the fruit affected, significantly, biochemical characteristics such as sugar, treatable acids, and vitamin C contents.

Concerning interaction effects between both variables of the present study, the tabulated results (Table 4) reflected that as both independent variable concentrations increased; the given traits, average values increased significantly (p≤0.05) in a direct proportionate relationship, especially when potato plants were foliar treated with 30 mg.l-1 of boron in combination with 30 mg.l-1 of BA as cytokinin; the particular treatment gave rise to the highest significant average values for fruit content of starch as 44.17 and 47.13%, reducing sugar as 3.20 and 3.53 %,  non-reducing sugars as 4.51 and 4.35%, total sugars as 7.71 and 7.88%, TSS as 7.75 and 7.95%, and ascorbic acid as 20.64 and 22.85 mg/100g compare with average values of control plants, measurements, which were 39.76 and 41.13% for starch, 1.99 and 2.14 %  for reducing sugar, 3.63 and 3.76 (%) for non-reducing sugar, 5.62 and 5.90 (%) for total sugar, and 6.48 and 6.72 % for TSS and finally 17.55 and 18.16 mg/100g for ascorbic acid during both seasons of the study 2018 and 2019, each in turn.

3.4. Tubers N, P, K, and B contents

Nutritional elements of potato tubers; Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Boron concentrations as affected by the treatments under investigations presented in Table (5). Results in Table (5) demonstrated that; foliar application of boron with different levels significantly increased the mean values of all nutritional elements over those obtained for the control treatment. The highest mean values of all nutrients content recorded at the level of 30 mg.l-1. Comparing with the control treatment, the rate of increases was accounted to be 66.94, 43.83, 42.24, and 12.77 (%) over the control treatment for N, P, K, and B, respectively in the season of 2018, and the same trend happened in the second season.

 

 

 

Table (5).  Average values of some chemical determination of potato tubers cv. ‘Hermes’ characteristics as affected by foliar application with Boron (B), cytokinin (6-BA) and their combinations during the summer seasons of 2018 and 2019.

 

Treatments

Nutrient contents of tubers (d.w.)

 

N%

P%

K%

B (mg/kg)

 

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

 

B mg.l-1 (main effect)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

1.21d

1.47d

0.162d

0.189d

1.87d

1.97d

16.92d

18.50d

 

10

1.84c

2.10c

0.218c

0.239c

2.48c

2.69c

17.73c

19.34c

 

20

1.92b

2.19b

0.226b

0.246cb

2.58b

2.79b

18.59b

20.28b

 

30

2.02a

2.27a

0.233a

0.252a

2.66a

2.88a

19.08a

20.83a

 

6-BA  mg.l-1  (main effect)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

1.41d

1.66d

0.181d

0.205d

2.06d

2.20d

17.68d

19.26d

 

10

1.63c

1.90c

0.200c

0.222c

2.28c

2.46c

18.02c

19.67c

 

20

1.85b

2.12b

0.220b

0.242b

2.51b

2.71b

18.21b

19.90b

 

30

2.09a

2.35a

0.239a

0.258a

2.74a

2.97a

18.41a

20.11a

 

Interaction effects

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B (mg.l-1)

6-BA ( mg.l-1 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

Control

1.08p

1.30p

0.151p

0.177k

1.73p

1.79p

16.64l

18.15o

 

10

1.17o

1.43o

0.159o

0.182k

1.82o

1.89o

16.84k

18.43n

 

20

1.25n

1.51n

0.167n

0.198j

1.92n

2.04m

16.96k

18.60m

 

30

1.34m

1.62m

0.174m

0.201ij

2.00m

2.15n

17.22j

18.82l

 

10

Control

1.43l

1.70l

0.182l

0.208hi

2.08l

2.25l

17.42i

19.04k

 

10

1.70i

1.98i

0.206i

0.228f

2.35i

2.55i

17.62h

19.22j

 

20

1.98f

2.22f

0.229f

0.249d

2.60f

2.82f

17.81h

19.45i

 

30

2.24c

2.50c

0.254c

0.271b

2.90c

3.14c

18.05g

19.65h

 

20

Control

1.52k

1.78k

0.191k

0.214gh

2.18k

2.34k

18.23g

19.83g

 

10

1.79h

2.05h

0.214h

0.237e

2.43h

2.64h

18.55ef

20.18f

 

20

2.04e

2.32e

0.237e

0.257c

2.71e

2.94e

18.74de

20.44e

 

30

2.33b

2.59b

0.260b

0.277ab

2.99b

3.24b

18.86d

20.65d

 

30

Control

1.62j

1.86j

0.198j

0.221fg

2.26j

2.43j

18.42f

20.03f

 

10

1.88g

2.13g

0.221g

0.241e

2.52g

2.74g

19.06c

20.85c

 

20

2.15d

2.41d

0.245d

0.262c

2.81d

3.03d

19.33b

21.09b

 

30

2.42a

2.68a

0.268a

0.284a

3.06a

3.34a

19.53a

21.34a

 

- Values having the same alphabetical letter (s) in common, within each column, do not significantly differ, using the revised L.S.D. test at 0.05 level of probability.

 

The increase of N content maybe returns to the role of B in the synthesis of amino acids and proteins, while the increase in P content may be attributed to the role of B in root tips, whereas membrane-bound ATPase activity influenced by Boron levels in the root (Canada 2002). The increase in K content may related to the synergism relationship between K and B at sugar and carbohydrate transport (Mengle and Kirkby 1978). The increase in B content certainly due to the increase of boron levels in the media. Similar results were obtained by El-Banna and Abd El-Salam (2005) who indicated that treated potato plants with different foliar spraying rates of B (50 and 75 ppm) significantly, recorded the highest concentrations of N, K, and B in plants. Also, El-Mahdy (2007) showed that foliar spray of B at a rate of 75 ppm increased pepper N, P, K, and B and its uptake. Moreover, El-Said (2009) showed that foliar application of boron at 100 ppm significantly increases N, P, and K contents in sweet pepper plant leave. In the same line, El-Dissoky and Abdel-Kadar (2013) found thatthe uptake of N, P, and K significantly increased by foliar B application in the potato plant.

The different comparisons tabulated in Table (5) indicated that the average values of all nutritional elements in potato tubers significantly increased because of spray potato plant with the different levels of BA as cytokinin. The highest mean values for the previously mentioned traits found to be associated with the addition of 30 mg.l-1 for N, P, K, and B elements. The average mean values of all nutritional elements of potato for both seasons significantly increased over those obtained for the control treatment. The highest mean values recorded as (2.09 and 2.35%) for N content, (0.239 and 0.258%) for P content, (2.74 and 2.97%) for K content and (18.41 and 20.11 mg/kg) for B content, respectively during 2018 and 2019 seasons.

Nutritional element concentrations in potato tuber as affected by the interaction between all treatments under study tabulated in Table (5). Data of this table revealed that the mean values of the most nutritional elements in potato tuber tended to increase over the control treatment because of the interaction between the studied treatments. In this respect, the most suitable treatment which realized the highest values (2.42, 0.268, 3.06, and 19.53 for N %, P, K % and B mg/kg) during 2018 season were connected with 30 mg.l-1 boron+ 30 mg.l-1 BA. Besides, these mean values tended to increase than those obtained for the control treatment (1.08, 0.151, 1.73, and 16.64 for N, P, and K (%), and B mg/kg, respectively in 2018). The same trend was true during the 2019 season.

Generally, the foliar application of both boron and cytokinin solution had a significant effect on potato yield, tuber physical and chemical quality and nutritional content. Therefore, the present study recommend a foliar application of boron plus cytokinin at rate of 30 mg l-1 to obtain the highest yield of potato and good quality tubers.

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

Practically, from the above-mentioned results and under the conditions of this research, it could concluded that foliar application of boron at 30 mg l-1 and cytokinin at 30 mg l-1, is the appropriate combination of both independent variables for the best growth characters, yield, and its components and chemical composition.

                Further research on cytokinin as 6-benzyl adenine is important because of its high content of unprocessed natural nutrients necessary for plant growth and quality; also, it protects the environment from pollution.

References
REFERENCES

AOAC (1992). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15ᵀh Ed. Published by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists III. North Nineteenth suite 210 Arlington, Virginia 2220/U.S.A.

Awad, E. M. M. and S. A. A. Mansour (2007). Growth, yield, and quality of potato as affected by some antioxidants. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 32 (8): 6661-6669.

Bricker, B. (1991). MSTATC: A Micro Computer Program from the Design Management and Analysis of Agronomic Research Experiments. Michigan State Univ., USA.

Canada, A. L. (2002). Fact Sheet No. 90: Boron as a Plant Nutrient. A & L Canada Laboratories, 2136 Jetstream Rd., London, ON N5V 3P5, 519-457-2575. (C.F. www.alcanada.com).

Carter, M. R., and E. G. Gregorich (2008). Soil sampling and methods of Analysis. Second   Edition. Canadian Soc. Soil Sci., Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1264 pages.

Chapman, H. D., and P. F. Pratt (1978). Methods of analysis for soils, plants, and waters. Univ. of California, Div. Agric. Sci., Priced publication.

‏Dinesh, K., R. Ezekiel, B. Singh, and I. Ahmed (2005). Conversion table for specific gravity dry matter and starch content from under water weight of potatoes grown in North India plains. Potato J., 32 (1-2): 79-84.

Duncan, D B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42.

El-Banna, E. N. and H. Z. Abd El-Salam (2005). Response of potato plants for different sources of potassium with different foliar rates of boron and molybdenum. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 30(10): 6221-6233.

El-Dissoky, R. A. and A. E. S. Abdel-Kadar (2013). Effect of boron as a foliar application on some potato's cultivars under Egyptian alluvial soil conditions. Res. J. Agric. & Biol. Sci., 9(5): 232-240.

El-Mahdy, R.E. (2007). Effect of heavy nitrogen application on pepper plant (Capsicum annuum). M. Sci. Thesis Fac. Agric. Mansoura Univ., Egypt.

El-Said, M. E. (2009). Effect of boron foliar application and different combinations of mineral and organic nitrogen fertilization on growth, chemical composition, and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 34(5): 4841-4860.

El-Shraiy, A. M.  and A. M. Hegazi (2010). Influence of JA and CPPU on growth, yield and α-amylase activity in potato plant (Solanum tuberosum L.). Aust. J. Basic and Appl. Sci., 4(2): 160-170.

Frito Lay Company (1999). Potato sending Manual. Operations quality system department. Leicester, United Kingdom.

Gomez, K. A., and A. A. Gomez (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.pp:680.

Kolachevskaya, O. O., L. I. Sergeeva, K. Floková, I. A. Getman, S. N. Lomin, V. V. Alekseeva and G. A. Romanov (2017). Auxin synthesis gene tms1 driven by tuber-specific promoter alters hormonal status of transgenic potato plants and their responses to exogenous phytohormones. Pl. Cell Repts, 36(3): 419-435.‏

Kolachevskaya, O. O., V. V. Alekseeva, L. I. Sergeeva, E. B. Rukavtsova, I. A. Getman, D. Vreugdenhil and G. A.  Romanov (2015). Expression of auxin synthesis gene tms1 under control of tuber‐specific promoter enhances potato tuberization in vitro. J. of integr. Pl. Biol., 57(9): 734-744.‏

Li, C., and A.A. Kader. 1989. Residual effects of controlled atmospheres on postharvest physiology and quality of strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 114(4): 629-634.

Liu, J. and C.H.  Xie (2001). Correlation of cell division and cell expansion to potato microtuber growth in vitro. Pl. Cell Tiss. & Organ Cult., 67: 159-164.

Majiid, H., S. Minali, M. Almasi and Y. Mostofi (2011). Total soluble solids, titrable acidity and ripening index of tomato in various storage conditions. Aust. J. Basic. Appl. Sci., 5(12):1723- 1726.

Malik, C. P. and M. B. Singh (1980). Plant Enzymology and Histo-Enzymology- A text Manual, PP. 276- 277, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.

Manjunath, R. P., V. M. Anjanappa, G. K. Ramegowda, S. Anilkumar and P.S. Prasad (2018). Influence of foliar spray of micronutrient formulation on quality and shelf life of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Intl. J. Pure. Appl. BioSci., 6(1): 660-665.

Mengle m K. and E. A. Kirkby (1978). "Principles of Plant Nutrition." Int. Potash Inst., Berne, Sweitzerland.

Miller, C.O., F. Skoog, M. H Saltza and F. M. Strong (1955) Kinetin, a cell division factor from deoxyribonucleic acid. 1. Amer. Chem. Soc., 77: 1329-1334.

Mok, M. C., D. W. S. Mok, S. C. Dixon, D. J. Armstrong and G. Shaw. (1982). Cytokinin structure–activity relationships and the metabolism of N6- (D2-isopentenyl) adenosine-8-14C in Phaseolus callus cultures. Pl. Physiol., 70:173–178.

Mousawinejad, S., F. Z. Nahandi and A. Baghalzadeh (2014). Effects of CPPU on size and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits. Postharvest Biol. & Techn., 89 (4): 555-573.‏

Muthanna, M. A., A. K. Singh, A. Tiwari, V. K. Jain and M. Padhi (2017). Effect of boron and sulphur application on plant growth and yield attributes of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Intl. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci.,6(10): 399-404.

Njogu, M. K., G. K. Gathungu and P. M. Danie (2015). Comparative effects of foliar application of gibberellic acid and benzylaminopurine on seed potato tuber sprouting and yield of resultant plants. Am. J. Agric.  and Forest., 3 (5): 192-201.‏

Prasad, R., D. Kumar, Y. S. Shivay, and D. S. Rana (2014). Boron in Indian agriculture - a review. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 59(4): 511-517.

Ranganna, S. (1986). Handbook of Analysis and Quality Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Ltd., New Delhi, India.1112 Pp.

Rosin, F. M., J. K.  Hart, H. Van Onckelen and D. J. Hannapel (2003). Suppression of vegetative MADS box gene of potato activates axillary meristem development. Pl.  Physiol., 129: 175-180.‏

Roumeliotis, E., B. Kloosterman, M. Oortwijn, W. Kohlen, H. J. Bouwmeester and R. G. Visser (2012). The effects of auxin and strigolactones on tuber initiation and stolon architecture in potato. J. Exp. Bot., 63:4539-4547.‏

Singh, D., P. K. Chhonker and B. S. Dwivedi (2005). Manual on soil plant and water analysis. West Ville publishing house, New Delhi, pp. 200.

Smith, O. (1977). Potatoes: production, storing and processing. The AVI Publishing Company, Westport, Connecticut, USA. Second edition. pp. 222-302.

Takahashi, S., K. Shudo, T. Okamoto, K. Yamada, Y. Isogai (1978). Cytokinin activity of N-phenyl-N0-(4-pyridyl) urea derivatives. Phytochemistry, 17:1201-1207.

Wolf, B. (1971). The determination of boron in soil extracts, plant materials, composts, manures, waters and nutrient solutions. Comm. Soil Sci. and Plant Anal., 2: 363

Statistics
Article View: 886
PDF Download: 810
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.