Document Type : Research papers
Authors
1 Plant Production Dept. Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha) Alexandria University
2 Medicinal and Aromatic Res. Dept. A.R.C. Alexandria, Egypt of Medicinal and Aromatic plants
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
INTRODUCTION
Moringa (Moringa oleifera) is well known for its multi-purpose attributes, wide actaplability and case of establishment. Every part of the plant is of food value, moringa leaves contain seven times more vitamin-C than oranges, four times more calcium than milk, four times more vitamin-A than carrot, three times more potassium than banana and two times more milk. Hence, it is considered as a powerhouse of nutritional value (Morton, 1991). The seeds are also used for oil productions; this oil is used in art, cosmetics and medicine; and can be consumed as food. Bio-fertilizers are microbial inoculants used for application to either seeds or soil for increasing soil fertility with objective of increasing the number of such micro- organisms and to accelerate ecertain microbial processes (Mazher, et al. 2014).
Fertilization is one of the most important factors limiting the productivity of plants. The intensive use of expensive mineral fertilizers in recent gears results in environmental pollution problems. However, chemical fertilizers at extremely high rates for a long period decreased the potential activity of microflora. (Adeoye et al., 2005).
Additionally, organic manures in the form of compost, animal manure, farmyard manure (FYM) and green manure organic materials are generally added to soils to improve their physical and chemical properties. They enhance the soil fertility by their composition of macro and micro-elements, amino acid, organic acids, sugars and organic matter (Abou El-Fadi, 1968). Furthermore, biofertilization is an important factor being used to produce products without some mineral fertilizer that cause environmental pollution problems and high rates of it leads in decrease the potential activity of microflora and the mobility of organic matters. Hence, the attention has been focused on the researches of biofertilization to safe alternative specific chemical fertilizers. Biofertilizers play vital role of increasing the number of microorganisms and accelerate certain of microbial process in the rhizosphere of inoculated soil of plants which can change the available form of some nutrients to be plants (Anjorin et al., 2010; Adebayo et al., 2011; Attia et al., 2014). This research, however, in an attempt to find out the best fertilization treatments, i.e. mineral fertilizer plus organic manure and biofertilizer on the vegetative growth and chemical composition of moringa (Moringa oleifera).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present investigation was carried out during both seasons of 2014 and 2015 at Abees Experimental Farm of the Faculty of Agricultural (Saba Basha), Alexandria University. A filed experimental was designed to study theeffect of mineral, organic and bio-fertilization on growth and production of Moringa plants.
Some physical and chemical properties of the experimental field soil and organic matter during the two seasons were done and the data are shown in Tables (1 and 2).
Regarding the cultivated of Moringa oleifera plant look place the research and production station, Cairo (National Research Center). However, planted in 2.5 x 2.5 meter space. Mineral fertilizer was applied at 600 g/tree of ammonium nitrate (33.5%N), 250 g/tree of calcium super-phosphate (15.5% P2O5) and 300g/tree of potaium sulphate (50% K2O). 1.5 kg sheep manure with 400 g biofertilizer (phosphorein and cerealine) and and cerealine) liter of A- mycorrhizal, and rate of calcium superphosphate were mixed with 0.15 m depth of top soil around the tree trunk at one dose at March, while nitrogen and potassium fertilizer were applied in three equal doses at April, May and June.
The applied treatments were a follow:
1.Fertilization
100 % organic
75% organic manure + 25% mineral
50% organic manure + 50% mineral
25% organic manure + 75% mineral
100% mineral
Table (1). Some physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil in 2014 and 2015 seasons
Soil properties |
Season |
|
2014 |
2015 |
|
A) Mechanical analyses : |
|
|
Clay % Sand % Silt % |
42.50 16.50 41.00 |
43.00 15.80 41.20 |
Soil texture |
Clay loam soil |
|
B) Chemical properties |
|
|
pH ( 1 : 1) EC (dS/m) |
7.60 2.20 |
7.80 2.30 |
1) Soluble cations (1:2) (cmol/kg soil) |
|
|
K+ Ca++ Mg++ Na++ |
0.90 4.20 3.10 8.20 |
0.92 4.25 3.20 8.15 |
2) Soluble anions (1 : 2) (cmol/kg soil) |
|
|
CO3--+ HCO3- Cl- SO4— Calcium carbonate (%) Total nitrogen (%) Available phosphate (mg/kg) Organic matter (%) |
2.80 11.30 0.48 7.80 0.48 3.60 0.95 |
2.70 11.50 0.50 7.90 0.49 3.70 0.90 |
Table (2). Analysis of the applied organic manure (sheep manure).
Properties of organic manure |
Value |
pH O.M % O.C % Total N% Total P% Total K% C/N ratio |
7.2 35.5 22.6 2.05 1.20 1.50 13.0:1 |
1.Biofertilizers treatments were randomly distributed in the sub plot a follows:
The plants were harvested 3 times per seasons i.e. August 10th September 10th in the first and second seasons by cutting the vegetative parts.
The following data of vegetative growth were recorded:
Plant height (cm), stem length (cm), stem diameter (cm), number of branches /plant, shoot fresh weight (g) and shoot dry weight (g).
The chemical compositions were recorded as following:
For these analyses, the leaves were dried at 70°C for 48hr., and ground. Leaves (0.5 g) were digested with sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide H2SO4+H2O2 according to the method of (Lowther, 1980)and the following determining were carried out in the digested solution to determine the following:
Nitrogen was determined in digested plant material colorimetrically by Nessler`smethod (Chapman and Pratt, 1978). Nessler solution (35 g KI/100 ml d.w. + 20g HgCl2 / 500 ml d.w.) +120 g NaOH / 250 ml d.w. Reading was achieved using wave length of 420 nm and N was determined as percentage as follows:
% N = NH4 % x 0.776485
Phosphorus was determined by the Vanadomolyate yellow methodas given by Jackson (1973) and the intensity of color developed was read in spectrophotometer at 405nm.
Potassium was determined according to the method described by method Jackson (1973) using Beckman Flame photometer.
Extraction was carried out by grinding dry matter in Mahadavaine buffer (sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.8). Extracts were homogenized for 3 minutes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min. the supernatant was then used to determine total soluble carbohydrates.
The obtained data were statistically analyzed according toGomez and Gomez (1984). The least significantly differences test (L.S.D.) at 0.05 was used in compare between means of the different treatments.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A) Vegetative growth
The obtained results, given in Tables (3, 4 and 5) clearly show that combination of mineral plus organic manure fertilizer exhibited a significant effect on all estimated traits at the achieved three cuts during both seasons. Application of 75% organic manure + 25% mineral, significantly, increased plant height, stem length, stem diameter, number of branches /plant, shoot fresh and shoot dry weight/plant at the three cuts during both seasons. These results may be due to the nutritional benefits of organic manure which include improvement of soil fertility, water holding capacity and organic matter and response to organic manure attributed to increasing nitrogen nutrition as indicated by increased concentration in plant tissues (Dania et al., 2014).
Inoculation of A- mycorrhizal fungi, significantly, increased plant height, stem length, stem diameter, number of branches /plant, shoot fresh and shoot dry weight/plant at three cuts during both seasons in comparison to uninoculation treatments (control). It could be concluded that A- mycorrhizal fungi inoculation treatment promoted the production of moringa growth. However, these events could be attributed to more adsorption of nutrients which reflected more on growth, more cell division and enlargement more of tissue and organs and plant elongation. Also, the phosphate solubilizing bacteria and nitrogen fixing may increases. The synthesis of endogenous phytohormones, i.e. IAA, GAs and CKs which play an important role in formation of mass active root system which allow more nutrients uptake. The previous results agree, more or less, with the findings of Rajendrn et al. (2000) on Cassuasin equisetifolia, Manorama et al. (2007) on Acaci mellifera and Attia et al. (2014) on Moringa oleifera.
The interaction between organic manure + mineral and bio-fertilization was significant and affected all traits at the three cuts during both seasons (Tables 3, 4 and 5). Tables (6 and 7) decleard, the application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral, resulted in the highest shoot fresh and shoot dry weight mean values with inoculation with A- mycorrhizal.
Table (3).Plant height (cm) and stem length (cm) as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilization at the three cuts in 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Plant height (cm) |
Stem length (cm) |
||||||||||
2014 Season |
2015 Season |
2014 |
2015 |
|||||||||
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
|
A) Mineral + Organic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% Organic 75% org. + 25% mineral 50 % org. + 50% mineral 25% org. +75% mineral 100% mineral |
100.24e 106.25a 102.30b 101.46c 100.72d |
111.65d 118.06a 114.75b 112.75c 111.92cd |
124.10cd 131.18a 127.12b 125.27c 123.54d |
111.65d 118.04a 114.42b 112.88c 111.91d |
121.05d 131.18a 127.13b 125.38c 125.18c |
134.83d 115.75a 141.25b 139.16c 137.25c |
71.70b 79.16a 64.09c 57.67d 52.23e |
89.30b 98.95a 80.15c 72.09d 64.92e |
111.47b 123.70a 100.19c 90.17d 81.15e |
79.14b 87.95a 71.21c 64.13d 58.03e |
98.37b 109.94a 89.05c 80.08d 73.13e |
123.69b 137.42a 111.32c 100.09d 90.16e |
LSD 0.05 |
0.44 |
1.05 |
1.25 |
0.40 |
1.70 |
2.05 |
3.10 |
4.50 |
6.30 |
3.70 |
4.70 |
6.90 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
92.44d 101.43b 112.52a 99.92e |
102.73d 116.26b 125.03a 111.29c |
114.12d 125.89b 138.92a 122.70c |
102.71d 116.23b 124.96a 111.15c |
114.12d 129.85b 138.92a 123.36c |
126.73d 143.33b 154.33a 136.33c |
60.66d 66.27b 69.51a 63.43c |
75.85d 82.45b 86.71a 79.29c |
94.96d 103.08b 108.04a 99.11c |
67.43d 73.56b 76.89a 70.49c |
84.88c 93.61b 96.13a 84.99c |
105.10d 114.53b 120.14a 110.06c |
LSD 0.05 |
1.02 |
2.10 |
2.30 |
1.50 |
2.20 |
2.50 |
2.40 |
3.10 |
3.90 |
2.20 |
3.30 |
4.10 |
Interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AxB |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test
*: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.
Table (4). Stem diameter (cm) and number of branches/plant as affected by mineral-organic andbiofertilizationat the three cutsin 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Stem diameter (cm) |
Number of branches/plant |
||||||||||
2014 Season |
2015 son |
2014 |
2015 |
|||||||||
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
|
A)Mineral + Organic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% Organic 75% org. + 25% mineral 50 % org. + 50% mineral 25% org. +75% mineral 100% mineral |
1.97b 2.20a 1.99ab 1.61d 1.66c |
2.20b 2.45a 2.02c 1.79d 1.84d |
3.15b 3.50a 2.86c 2.57d 2.31e |
2.20b 2.44a 2.21b 1.79d 1.86c |
2.44b 2.72a 2.20c 1.99d 1.88d |
3.52b 3.88a 3.16c 2.85d 2.57e |
8.59c 8.93a 8.78b 7.89d 7.24e |
9.70b 9.93a 9.75b 8.78d 7.89c |
10.77b 11.03a 10.84b 9.75c 8.69d |
9.68b 9.93a 9.75b 8.86c 8.04d |
10.76b 11.03a 10.83b 9.75c 8.77d |
11.96b 12.26a 12.04b 10.83c 9.74d |
LSD 0.05 |
0.03 |
0.07 |
0.12 |
0.05 |
0.13 |
0.25 |
0.06 |
0.10 |
0.16 |
0.11 |
0.17 |
0.19 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
1.30d 2.01b 2.36a 1.88c |
1.44d 2.26b 2.63a 1.90c |
2.07d 3.21b 3.76a 2.47c |
1.44d 2.24b 2.62a 2.08c |
1.30d 2.49b 2.91a 1.97c |
2.29d 3.56b 4.17a 2.74c |
7.11d 8.60b 9.45a 8.08e |
7.90d 9.55b 10.46a 8.90c |
8.79d 10.61b 11.55a 9.89c |
7.91d 9.55b 10.51a 9.05c |
8.78d 10.61b 11.62a 9.89c |
9.76d 11.79b 12.91a 10.99c |
LSD 0.05 |
0.04 |
0.11 |
0.20 |
0.14 |
0.23 |
0.30 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
0.18 |
0.20 |
0.25 |
0.40 |
Interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AxB |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test
*: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.
Table (5). Fresh of shoot weight (g) and shoot dry weight (g) as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilizationat the three cuts in 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Shoot fresh weight (g) |
Shoot dry weight (g) |
||||||||||
2014 Season |
2015 son |
2014 |
2015 |
|||||||||
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
|
A) Mineral + Organic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% Organic 75% org. + 25% mineral 50 % org. + 50% mineral 25% org. +75% mineral 100% mineral |
81.27b 90.58a 73.36c 66.72d 59.43e |
101.85b 113.22a 91.70c 82.62d 74.28e |
127.35b 136.41a 114.64c 103.18d 93.61e |
90.57b 100.64a 86.51c 73.47d 66.02 |
113.35b 125.63a 101.94c 91.54d 82.70e |
141.53b 154.45a 127.31c 114.63d 103.17e |
16.30b 18.11a 14.67c 13.20d 11.83e |
20.38b 22.64a 18.34c 16.51d 14.85e |
25.48b 29.06a 22.93c 20.72d 18.59e |
18.19b 20.14a 16.30c 14.67d 13.19e |
22.64b 25.16a 19.54c 18.34d 16.50e |
28.31b 31.448a 25.48c 22.93d 21.48e |
LSD 0.05 |
3.10 |
5.10 |
6.20 |
3.60 |
5.50 |
7.20 |
0.85 |
1.10 |
1.18 |
1.03 |
1.15 |
1.30 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
66.04d 75.79b 83.81a 71.07c |
83.62d 94.74b 104.77a 88.84c |
103.20d 118.40b 130.94a 111.05c |
73.38d 84.21b 93.12a 78.97c |
91.70d 105.23b 116.40a 98.41c |
114.66d 131.59b 145.45a 123.40c |
13.29d 15.16b 16.76a 14.34c |
16.51d 18.94b 20.91a 17.77c |
20.64d 23.75b 26.20a 22.22c |
14.67d 16.76b 18.62a 15.78c |
17.67d 21.05b 23.18a 19.74c |
22.93d 26.35b 29.78a 24.67c |
LSD 0.05 |
2.80 |
4.40 |
6.30 |
3.10 |
5.10 |
6.50 |
1.00 |
1.10 |
1.30 |
1.05 |
1.10 |
1.45 |
Interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AxB |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test
*: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.
Table (6). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on shoots fresh weight/ plant (g) for moranga plant at three cuts during 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Shoots fresh weight /plant (g) |
||||||
2014 Season |
2015 Season |
||||||
Org.+mineral |
Biofertilization |
1stcut |
2ndcut |
3thcut |
1stcut |
2ndcut |
3thcut |
100% org.
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
72.57 83.29 92.10 78.10 |
90.72 104.11 115.13 97.63 |
11.42 130.16 143.81 121.98 |
80.64 92.54 102.33 86.78 |
100.80 115.80 127.92 108.48 |
126.00 144.60 159.90 185.60 |
75%org.+25%mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
80.64 92.84 102.34 86.76 |
100.30 115.68 127.92 108.48 |
126.00 144.44 159.90 85.60 |
89.60 102.88 113.70 96.42 |
114.66 128.20 142.13 120.53 |
140.00 160.66 177.66 150.66 |
50%org.+50%mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
65.31 74.95 92.88 70.29 |
81.65 93.70 103.61 87.83 |
102.06 117.13 129.52 109.84 |
72.57 83.28 92.10 78.10 |
90.91 104.11 115.12 97.63 |
113.40 130.14 143.64 122.04 |
25%org.+75%mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
58.78 67.46 74.59 63.26 |
73.82 84.32 93.25 79.08 |
91.86 105.42 116.57 98.86 |
65.31 74.95 88.88 70.29 |
81.65 93.65 103.60 87.86 |
102.06 117.12 129.51 109.83 |
100%mineral |
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
52.90 60.73 67.14 56.94 |
66.13 75.89 83.92 71.71 |
82.66 94.87 104.91 88.97 |
58.78 67.46 74.59 63.26 |
73.48 84.99 93.25 79.08 |
91.85 105.41 116.56 98.85 |
LSD 0.05 |
3.30 |
5.40 |
6.50 |
3.50 |
5.70 |
7.40 |
Table (7). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on shoots dry weight/ plant (g) for moranga plants at three cuts during 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Shoots dry weight /plant |
||||||
2014 Season |
2015 Season |
||||||
Org. + mineral |
Biofertilization |
1st cut |
2ndcut |
3th cut |
1st cut |
2nd cut |
3th cut |
100%org.
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
14.52 16.65 18.41 15.61 |
18.14 20.82 23.02 19.52 |
22.68 26.03 28.78 24.41 |
16.13 18.50 20.46 17.35 |
20.16 23.13 25.58 21.69 |
25.20 28.92 31.98 27.12 |
75%org.+25%mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
16.12 18.51 20.46 17.35 |
20.16 23.13 25.58 21.69 |
25.20 28.92 31.98 27.14 |
17.91 20.56 22.74 19.28 |
22.40 25.70 28.42 24.10 |
28.00 32.26 35.53 30.13 |
50 % org.+50%mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
13.06 14.99 16.57 14.06 |
16.33 18.73 20.72 17.57 |
20.41 23.43 25.90 21.96 |
14.51 16.65 18.41 15.62 |
14.80 20.81 23.02 19.52 |
22.67 26.02 28.78 24.40 |
25%org.+75%mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
11.75 13.49 14.92 12.65 |
14.69 16.86 18.65 15.82 |
18.37 21.41 23.31 19.79 |
13.06 14.99 16.52 14.05 |
16.32 18.74 20.72 17.57 |
20.41 23.45 25.40 21.90 |
100%mineral |
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
10.58 12.14 13.42 11.38 |
13.22 15.18 16.78 14.23 |
16.54 18.97 21.03 17.79 |
11.75 13.49 14.91 12.62 |
14.69 16.86 18.64 15.81 |
18.37 21.08 26.70 19.76 |
LSD (0.05) |
1.08 |
1.15 |
1.28 |
1.06 |
1.20 |
1.47 |
B) Chemical composition
Data presented in Tables (8 and 9) indicated that organic manure plus mineral fertilizers significantly affected nitrogen (%), phosphorus (%), potassium (%), protein (%), total carbohydrate (%) and vitamin (C) in both seasons. Application of 75% organic manure + 25% mineral; gave rise the highest mean values of all studied chemical composition parameters as compared with application 100 % mineral fertilizer in both seasons.
The increment in chemical composition of moringa leaves using the treatments of organic manure may be owing attributed to increase in the occupancy root zone of plant result of adding organic manure which reflected on N, P and K uptake by plant and confirm the pervious of vegetative growth. Similar results were obtained by Prabhakar and Hebbar (2007), Adebayo et al. (2011) on Moringa oleifera, Makinde (2013) on moringa plant and Attia et al. (2014) on moringa plant.
Concerning the bio-fertilization, treatments in Tables (8 and 9) revealed that inoculation moringa plants with bio-fertilization, increased all the studied of chemical composition in both seasons compared to uninoculated moringa (control).
It can, also, be suggested to use combined biofertilizer including phosphorein, A- mycorrhizal and cerealine biofertilizer including all biofertilizer to produce a high quality moringa trees. Several reports on biofertilizer utilization have emphasized that a single inoculation showed higher productivity than uninoculation treatment (control). Shah et al. (2006), Attia et al. (2014) and Mazher et al. (2014).
The interaction between combination organic manure and mineral and bio-fertilization were significant for N, P and K % in both seasons (Table 10). Application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral, gave the highest mean values of N% with cerealine, P% with phosphorein and K% with A- mycorrhizal inoculation as compared with was uninoculation treatment.
The significant differences for the interaction between combination organic manure plus mineral and bio-fertilization in both seasons due to application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral, brought about the greatest protein percentage with treatment of cerealine biofertilizer and total carbohydrate (%), vitamin (C) with A- mycorrhizal in both seasons (Table 11).
In conclusion, some organs of moringa are good source important minerals and these plants might be explored as a viable supplement and ready source of dietary minerals in animal and human food. There was a significant variation in macro and microelements in moringa leaves. Also, the application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral gave the highest vegetative growth and chemical composition with A- mycorrhizal inoculation.
Table (8). Nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium percentages as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilization in 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
2014 Season |
2015 Season |
||||
N % |
P % |
K % |
N % |
P % |
K % |
|
A)Mineral + Organic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% Organic 75% org. + 25% mineral 50 % org. + 50% mineral 25% org. +75% mineral 100% mineral |
2.91b 3.22a 2.62c 2.35d 2.12e |
0.400b 0.450a 0.360c 0.320d 0.290e |
2.35b 2.61a 2.11c 1.91d 1.96d |
3.23b 3.61a 2.91c 2.61d 2.35e |
0.448b 0.498a 0.403c 0.355d 0.318e |
2.61b 2.90a 2.33c 2.12d 2.17d |
LSD 0.05 |
0.10 |
0.012 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.040 |
0.19 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
2.19c 2.57b 2.67b 3.16a |
0.250d 0.472a 0.410b 0.326c |
2.04d 2.15c 2.40a 2.25b |
2.43c 2.85b 2.92b 3.51a |
0.280d 0.520a 0.452b 0.364c |
2.16c 2.38b 2.66a 2.48b |
LSD 0.05 |
0.11 |
0.015 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
0.050 |
0.17 |
Interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AxB |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test
*: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.
Table (9). Protein (%), vitamin (C)and total carbohydrate (%)as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilization in 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
2014 Season |
2015 Season |
||||
Protein % |
Vitamin (C) mg/100 ml juice |
Total carbohydrate % |
Protein % |
Vitamin (C) mg/100 ml juice |
Total carbohydrate % |
|
A) Mineral + Organic |
||||||
100% Organic 75% org.+25% mineral50%org.+50%mineral 25% org.75% mineral 100% mineral |
18.60b 20.22a 16.36c 14.71d 13.25e |
0.526b 0.584a 0.467c 0.420d 0.409d |
19.79b 22.06a 17.87c 16.10d 14.47e |
20.20b 22.47a 18.18c 16.34d 14.70e |
0.584b 0.648a 0.519c 0.467d 0.454d |
22.06h 24.51a 19.85c 17.87d 16.08e |
LSD 0.05 |
1.10 |
0.35 |
1.30 |
1.20 |
0.052 |
1.45 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
||||||
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
14.02c 16.05b 16.67b 19.70a |
0.449d 0.497b 0.514a 0.466c |
14.27d 19.02b 22.03a 16.90c |
15.20c 17.83b 18.51b 21.95a |
0.497c 0.552a 0.570a 0.518b |
15.85d 21.14b 24.54a 18.78c |
LSD (0.05) |
1.20 |
0.015 |
1.50 |
1.30 |
0.040 |
1.90 |
Interaction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AxB |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test
*: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.
Table (10). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on macronutrients (N, P and K %) for moranga plants in 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
N% |
P% |
K% |
|||||
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
|||
Org. + mineral |
Biofertilization |
|||||||
100% Org.
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
2.41 2.83 2.93 3.48 |
2.67 3.13 3.25 3.66 |
0.28 0.52 0.45 0.36 |
0.31 0.58 0.50 0.40 |
2.13 2.36 2.64 2.27 |
2.36 2.62 2.93 2.51 |
|
75% org. + 25% mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
2.68 3.14 3.26 5.86 |
2.97 3.49 3.62 4.29 |
0.30 0.59 0.50 0.40 |
0.34 0.65 0.55 0.45 |
2.87 2.62 2.93 2.53 |
2.63 2.91 3.26 2.80 |
|
50 % org. + 50% mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
2.16 2.54 2.64 3.13 |
2.40 2.82 2.93 3.47 |
0.25 0.47 0.40 0.32 |
0.28 0.52 0.45 0.36 |
1.92 2.12 2.37 2.04 |
2.13 2.33 2.63 2.21 |
|
25% org. +75% mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
1.94 2.28 2.37 2.81 |
2.16 2.54 2.63 3.12 |
0.22 0.41 0.57 0.29 |
0.25 0.45 0.40 0.32 |
1.73 1.91 2.13 1.85 |
1.92 2.12 2.37 2.05 |
|
100% mineral |
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
1.75 2.06 2.13 2.53 |
1.94 2.28 2.37 2.81 |
0.20 0.37 0.33 0.26 |
0.22 0.40 0.36 0.29 |
1.57 1.75 1.92 2.58 |
1.74 1.94 2.13 2.86 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.017 |
0.06 |
0.14 |
0.20 |
Table (11). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on Protein %, Vitamin (C) and Total carbohydrate %for moranga plants in 2014 and 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Protein (%) |
Vitamin (C) ( mg/100 ml juice ) |
Total carbohydrate (%) |
|||||
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
|||
Org. + mineral |
Biofertilization |
|||||||
100% Org.
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
16.72 17.64 18.32 21.73 |
16.72 19.60 20.35 24.14 |
0.488 0.543 0.562 0.509 |
0.543 0.604 0.624 0.566 |
15.68 20.89 24.00 18.57 |
17.42 23.22 26.97 20.64 |
|
75% org. + 25% mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
16.74 19.63 20.36 24.16 |
18.60 21.81 22.62 26.85 |
0.542 0.604 0.624 0.566 |
0.603 0.671 0.688 0.629 |
17.42 23.22 26.47 20.64 |
19.36 25.80 29.96 22.93 |
|
50 % org. +50% mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
13.53 15.88 16.49 19.55 |
15.03 17.64 18.31 21.77 |
0.434 0.482 0.494 0.452 |
0.483 0.536 0.554 0.503 |
14.11 18.80 21.84 16.72 |
15.68 20.89 24.27 18.57 |
|
25% org. +75% mineral
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
12.16 14.28 14.83 17.57 |
13.61 15.87 16.47 19.52 |
0.396 0.434 0.450 0.407 |
0.434 0.482 0.499 0.452 |
12.70 16.98 19.66 15.04 |
14.11 18.80 21.84 16.71 |
|
100% mineral |
Uninoculation Phosphorein Mycorrhizal Cerealine |
10.93 12.84 13.33 15.80 |
12.14 14.27 14.81 17.56 |
0.380 0.422 0.436 0.396 |
0.422 0.469 0.480 0.440 |
11.43 15.23 17.69 13.54 |
12.09 16.91 19.66 15.04 |
|
LSD (0.05) |
1.22 |
1.33 |
0.040 |
0.055 |
1.35 |
1.96 |