• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 30 (2025)
Volume Volume 29 (2024)
Volume Volume 28 (2023)
Volume Volume 27 (2022)
Volume Volume 26 (2021)
Volume Volume 25 (2020)
Volume Volume 24 (2019)
Volume Volume 23 (2018)
Volume Volume 22 (2017)
Volume Volume 21 (2016)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 20 (2015)
Volume Volume 19 (2014)
Abido, A., Radwan, F., Shaben, E., Abdel Gabr, N. (2016). Effect of Mineral, Organic and Bio-fertilization on Growth and Production of Moringa (Moringa oleifera, L.) Plants. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 21(2), 308-324. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2016.188237
Ali Ibrahim Abido; Fathy Ibrahim Radwan; Elsaid Hussein Shaben; Nezar Abdelkhalek Abdel Gabr. "Effect of Mineral, Organic and Bio-fertilization on Growth and Production of Moringa (Moringa oleifera, L.) Plants". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 21, 2, 2016, 308-324. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2016.188237
Abido, A., Radwan, F., Shaben, E., Abdel Gabr, N. (2016). 'Effect of Mineral, Organic and Bio-fertilization on Growth and Production of Moringa (Moringa oleifera, L.) Plants', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 21(2), pp. 308-324. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2016.188237
Abido, A., Radwan, F., Shaben, E., Abdel Gabr, N. Effect of Mineral, Organic and Bio-fertilization on Growth and Production of Moringa (Moringa oleifera, L.) Plants. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2016; 21(2): 308-324. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2016.188237

Effect of Mineral, Organic and Bio-fertilization on Growth and Production of Moringa (Moringa oleifera, L.) Plants

Article 9, Volume 21, Issue 2 - Serial Number 79, June 2016, Page 308-324  XML PDF (169.01 K)
Document Type: Research papers
DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2016.188237
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Ali Ibrahim Abido1; Fathy Ibrahim Radwan1; Elsaid Hussein Shaben2; Nezar Abdelkhalek Abdel Gabr1
1Plant Production Dept. Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha) Alexandria University
2Medicinal and Aromatic Res. Dept. A.R.C. Alexandria, Egypt of Medicinal and Aromatic plants
Abstract
Two filed experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University at Abees region, Alexandria, Egypt during the two growing seasons of 2014 and 2015 to study theeffect of mineral, organic and bio-fertilization on growth and productivity of moringa plants (Moringa oleifera, Lam).The experimental design was split plot were three replicates. The main plot were conducted for the five combination of organic manure plus mineral fertilizer of (100% organic, 75% organic manure + 25% mineral, 50% organic manure + 50% mineral, 25% organic manure + 75% mineral and 100% mineral), while, the four bio-fertilization treatments were uninoculation, phosphorein, A- mycorrhizal and cerealine were arranged in the sub-plot. The main results could be summarized as follows: (1) The application of 75% organic manure + 25% mineral; gave the highest mean values of all studied characters, (2) the application of 75% organic manure + 25% mineral with A- mycorrhizal inoculation was the best combination to obtain the highest mean values of plant height, stem length, stem diameter, number of branches /plant, fresh and dry weights/plant, K (%), total carbohydrate (%) and vitamin (C). However, all traits under study increased significantly due to inoculation treatments over the application 100% mineral with uninoculation treatments.
Keywords
Moringa oleifera; vegetative growth; inorganic; organic and bio-fertilization
Main Subjects
Agriculture-toxicology interactions; Crops and quality
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Moringa (Moringa oleifera) is well known for its multi-purpose attributes, wide actaplability and case of establishment. Every part of    the plant is of food value, moringa leaves contain seven times more vitamin-C than oranges, four times more calcium than milk, four times more vitamin-A than carrot, three times more potassium than banana and two times more milk. Hence, it is considered as a powerhouse of nutritional value (Morton, 1991). The seeds are also used for oil productions; this oil is used in art, cosmetics and medicine; and can be consumed as food. Bio-fertilizers are microbial inoculants used for application to either seeds or soil for increasing soil fertility with objective of increasing the number of such micro- organisms and to accelerate ecertain microbial processes (Mazher, et al. 2014).

 

Fertilization is one of the most important factors limiting the productivity of plants. The intensive use of expensive mineral fertilizers in recent gears results in environmental pollution problems. However, chemical fertilizers at extremely high rates for a long period decreased the potential activity of microflora.  (Adeoye et al., 2005).

 

Additionally, organic manures in the form of compost, animal manure, farmyard manure (FYM) and green manure organic materials are generally added to soils to improve their physical and chemical properties. They enhance the soil fertility by their composition of macro and micro-elements, amino acid, organic acids, sugars and organic matter (Abou El-Fadi, 1968). Furthermore, biofertilization is an important factor being used to produce products without some mineral fertilizer that cause environmental pollution problems and high rates of it leads in decrease the potential activity of microflora and the mobility of organic matters. Hence, the attention has been focused on the researches of biofertilization to safe alternative specific chemical fertilizers. Biofertilizers play vital role of increasing the number of microorganisms and accelerate certain of microbial process in the rhizosphere of inoculated soil of plants which can change the available form of some nutrients to be plants (Anjorin et al., 2010; Adebayo et al., 2011; Attia et al., 2014). This research, however, in an attempt to find out the best fertilization treatments, i.e. mineral fertilizer plus organic manure and biofertilizer on the vegetative growth and chemical composition of moringa (Moringa oleifera).

  

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present investigation was carried out during both seasons of 2014 and 2015 at Abees Experimental Farm of the Faculty of Agricultural (Saba Basha), Alexandria University. A filed experimental was designed to study theeffect of mineral, organic and bio-fertilization on growth and production of Moringa plants.

 

Some physical and chemical properties of the experimental field soil and organic matter during the two seasons were done and the data are shown in Tables (1 and 2).

 

Regarding the cultivated of Moringa oleifera plant look place the research and production station, Cairo (National Research Center). However, planted in 2.5 x 2.5 meter space. Mineral fertilizer was applied at 600 g/tree of ammonium nitrate (33.5%N), 250 g/tree of calcium super-phosphate (15.5% P2O5) and 300g/tree of potaium sulphate (50% K2O). 1.5 kg sheep manure with 400 g biofertilizer (phosphorein and cerealine) and and cerealine) liter of A- mycorrhizal, and rate of calcium superphosphate were mixed with 0.15 m depth of top soil around the tree trunk at one dose at March, while nitrogen and potassium fertilizer were applied in three equal doses at April, May and June.

The applied treatments were a follow:

1.Fertilization

100 % organic

75% organic manure + 25% mineral

50% organic manure + 50% mineral

25% organic manure + 75% mineral

100% mineral

 

Table (1). Some  physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil in 2014 and 2015 seasons

Soil properties

Season

2014

2015

A) Mechanical analyses :

 

Clay   %

Sand %

Silt    %

42.50

16.50

41.00

43.00

15.80

41.20

Soil texture

Clay loam soil

B) Chemical properties

 

pH ( 1 : 1)

EC (dS/m)

7.60

2.20

7.80

2.30

1) Soluble cations (1:2) (cmol/kg soil)

 

K+

Ca++

Mg++

Na++

0.90

4.20

3.10

8.20

0.92

4.25

3.20

8.15

2) Soluble anions (1 : 2) (cmol/kg soil)

 

CO3--+ HCO3-

Cl-

SO4—

Calcium carbonate (%)

Total nitrogen (%)

Available phosphate (mg/kg)

Organic matter (%)

2.80

11.30

0.48

7.80

0.48

3.60

0.95

2.70

11.50

0.50

7.90

0.49

3.70

0.90

 

Table (2). Analysis of the applied organic manure (sheep manure).

Properties of organic manure

Value

pH

O.M %

O.C %

Total N%

Total P%

Total K%

C/N ratio

7.2

35.5

22.6

2.05

1.20

1.50

13.0:1

 

1.Biofertilizers treatments were randomly distributed in the sub plot a follows:

  • Without inoculation (control)
  • Inoculation with cerealine: An inoculate for all crops containing of Azospirillum pp. (10 cell/g), Azotobacter chrooococum.
  • Inoculation with phosphorein: An inoculate for all crops containing of (Bacillus megatherium) soluble calcium phosphate. These inoculations are produced by the General Organization for Agriculture Equalization Ministry of Agriculture and land Reclamination Egypt (Ismali et al., 2009).
  • Inoculation of A- mycorrhizal fungi: inoculants for Moringa with fungi (Glomus mcrocarpium) strain from plant production Dept. (Saba Basha) Alex. Univ., at a rate of 250ml of infected roots and was mixed with tress of Moringa plants.

 

The plants were harvested 3 times per seasons i.e. August 10th September 10th in the first and second seasons by cutting the vegetative parts.

 

The following data of vegetative growth were recorded: 

Plant height (cm), stem length (cm), stem diameter (cm), number of branches /plant, shoot fresh weight (g) and shoot dry weight (g).

 

The chemical compositions were recorded as following: 

For these analyses, the leaves were dried at 70°C for 48hr., and ground. Leaves (0.5 g) were digested with sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide H2SO4+H2O2 according to the method of (Lowther, 1980)and the following determining were carried out in the digested solution to determine the following:

 

  • Nitrogen content (N%)

Nitrogen was determined in digested plant material colorimetrically by Nessler`smethod (Chapman and Pratt, 1978). Nessler solution (35 g KI/100 ml d.w. + 20g HgCl2 / 500 ml d.w.) +120 g NaOH / 250 ml d.w. Reading was achieved using wave length of 420 nm and N was determined as percentage as follows:

            % N = NH4 % x 0.776485

 

  • Phosphorus content (P %)

Phosphorus was determined by the Vanadomolyate yellow methodas given by Jackson (1973) and the intensity of color developed was read in spectrophotometer at 405nm.

 

  • Potassium content (K %)

Potassium was determined according to the method described by method Jackson (1973) using Beckman Flame photometer.

 

  • Total soluble carbohydrates were determined, quantitatively, in the herb of sage by Anthron method according to Yemm and Willis (1954) as follows:

Extraction was carried out by grinding dry matter in Mahadavaine buffer (sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.8). Extracts were homogenized for 3 minutes and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min. the supernatant was then used to determine total soluble carbohydrates.

 

  • Protein was determined by estimating the total nitrogen in the herbs and multiplied by 6.25 to obtain the percentage according to AOAC (1990).
  • The ascorbic acid content of the juice was determined by titration with 4, 6 dichloro phenol-indo-phenol (AOAC, 1984) and calculated as milli-grams per 100 ml of juice.

 

The obtained data were statistically analyzed according toGomez and Gomez (1984). The least significantly differences test (L.S.D.) at 0.05 was used in compare between means of the different treatments.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 

A)  Vegetative growth

The obtained results, given in Tables (3, 4 and 5) clearly show that combination of mineral plus organic manure fertilizer exhibited a significant effect on all estimated traits at the achieved three cuts during both seasons. Application of 75% organic manure + 25% mineral, significantly, increased plant height, stem length, stem diameter, number of branches /plant, shoot fresh and shoot dry weight/plant  at the three cuts during both seasons. These results may be due to the nutritional benefits of organic manure which include improvement of soil fertility, water holding capacity and organic matter and response to organic manure attributed to increasing nitrogen nutrition as indicated by increased concentration in plant tissues (Dania et al., 2014).

Inoculation of A- mycorrhizal fungi, significantly, increased plant height, stem length, stem diameter, number of branches /plant, shoot fresh and shoot dry weight/plant at three cuts during both seasons in comparison to uninoculation treatments (control). It could be concluded that A- mycorrhizal fungi inoculation treatment promoted the production of moringa growth. However, these events could be attributed to more adsorption of nutrients which reflected more on growth, more cell division and enlargement more of tissue and organs and plant elongation. Also, the phosphate solubilizing bacteria and nitrogen fixing may increases. The synthesis of endogenous phytohormones, i.e. IAA, GAs and CKs which play an important role in formation of mass active root system which allow more nutrients uptake. The previous results agree, more or less, with the findings of Rajendrn et al. (2000) on Cassuasin equisetifolia, Manorama et al. (2007) on Acaci mellifera and Attia et al. (2014) on Moringa oleifera.

The interaction between organic manure + mineral and bio-fertilization was significant and affected all traits at the three cuts during both seasons (Tables 3, 4 and 5). Tables (6 and 7) decleard, the application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral, resulted in the highest shoot fresh and shoot dry weight mean values with inoculation with A- mycorrhizal.

 

 

Table (3).Plant height (cm) and stem length (cm) as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilization at the three cuts in 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

Plant height (cm)

Stem length (cm)

2014 Season

2015 Season

2014

2015     

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut

A)  Mineral + Organic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100% Organic

75% org. + 25% mineral

50 % org. + 50% mineral

25% org. +75% mineral

100% mineral

100.24e

106.25a

102.30b

101.46c

100.72d

111.65d

118.06a

114.75b

112.75c

111.92cd

124.10cd

131.18a

127.12b

125.27c

123.54d

111.65d

118.04a

114.42b

112.88c

111.91d

121.05d

131.18a

127.13b

125.38c

125.18c

134.83d

115.75a

141.25b

139.16c

137.25c

71.70b

79.16a

64.09c

57.67d

52.23e

89.30b

98.95a

80.15c

72.09d

64.92e

111.47b

123.70a

100.19c

90.17d

81.15e

79.14b

87.95a

71.21c

64.13d

58.03e

98.37b

109.94a

89.05c

80.08d

73.13e

123.69b

137.42a

111.32c

100.09d

90.16e

LSD 0.05

0.44

1.05

1.25

0.40

1.70

2.05

3.10

4.50

6.30

3.70

4.70

6.90

B) Bio-fertilization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

92.44d

101.43b

112.52a

99.92e

102.73d

116.26b

125.03a

111.29c

114.12d

125.89b

138.92a

122.70c

102.71d

116.23b

124.96a

111.15c

114.12d

129.85b

138.92a

123.36c

126.73d

143.33b

154.33a

136.33c

60.66d

66.27b

69.51a

63.43c

75.85d

82.45b

86.71a

79.29c

94.96d

103.08b

108.04a

99.11c

67.43d

73.56b

76.89a

70.49c

84.88c

93.61b

96.13a

84.99c

105.10d

114.53b

120.14a

110.06c

LSD 0.05

1.02

2.10

2.30

1.50

2.20

2.50

2.40

3.10

3.90

2.20

3.30

4.10

Interaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AxB

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

 

 

Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test 

   *: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

        


 

Table (4). Stem diameter (cm) and number of branches/plant as affected by mineral-organic andbiofertilizationat the three cutsin 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

Stem diameter (cm)

Number of branches/plant

2014 Season

2015 son

2014

2015

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

A)Mineral + Organic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100% Organic

75% org. + 25% mineral

50 % org. + 50% mineral

25% org. +75% mineral

100% mineral

1.97b

2.20a

1.99ab

1.61d

1.66c

2.20b

2.45a

2.02c

1.79d

1.84d

3.15b

3.50a

2.86c

2.57d

2.31e

2.20b

2.44a

2.21b

1.79d

1.86c

2.44b

2.72a

2.20c

1.99d

1.88d

3.52b

3.88a

3.16c

2.85d

2.57e

8.59c

8.93a

8.78b

7.89d

7.24e

9.70b

9.93a

9.75b

8.78d

7.89c

10.77b

11.03a

10.84b

9.75c

8.69d

9.68b

9.93a

9.75b

8.86c

8.04d

10.76b

11.03a

10.83b

9.75c

8.77d

11.96b

12.26a

12.04b

10.83c

9.74d

LSD 0.05

0.03

0.07

0.12

0.05

0.13

0.25

0.06

0.10

0.16

0.11

0.17

0.19

B) Bio-fertilization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

1.30d

2.01b

2.36a

1.88c

1.44d

2.26b

2.63a

1.90c

2.07d

3.21b

3.76a

2.47c

1.44d

2.24b

2.62a

2.08c

1.30d

2.49b

2.91a

1.97c

2.29d

3.56b

4.17a

2.74c

7.11d

8.60b

9.45a

8.08e

7.90d

9.55b

10.46a

8.90c

8.79d

10.61b

11.55a

9.89c

7.91d

9.55b

10.51a

9.05c

8.78d

10.61b

11.62a

9.89c

9.76d

11.79b

12.91a

10.99c

LSD 0.05

0.04

0.11

0.20

0.14

0.23

0.30

0.11

0.13

0.18

0.20

0.25

0.40

Interaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AxB

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

 

     Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test 

        *: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 


 

      Table (5). Fresh of shoot weight (g) and shoot dry weight (g) as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilizationat the three cuts in 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

Shoot fresh weight (g)

Shoot dry weight (g)

2014 Season

2015 son

2014

2015

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut  

A)  Mineral + Organic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100% Organic

75% org. + 25% mineral

50 % org. + 50% mineral

25% org. +75% mineral

100% mineral

81.27b

90.58a

73.36c

66.72d

59.43e

101.85b

113.22a

91.70c

82.62d

74.28e

127.35b

136.41a

114.64c

103.18d

93.61e

90.57b

100.64a

86.51c

73.47d

66.02

113.35b

125.63a

101.94c

91.54d

82.70e

141.53b

154.45a

127.31c

114.63d

103.17e

16.30b

18.11a

14.67c

13.20d

11.83e

20.38b

22.64a

18.34c

16.51d

14.85e

25.48b

29.06a

22.93c

20.72d

18.59e

18.19b

20.14a

16.30c

14.67d

13.19e

22.64b

25.16a

19.54c

18.34d

16.50e

28.31b

31.448a

25.48c

22.93d

21.48e

LSD 0.05

3.10

5.10

6.20

3.60

5.50

7.20

0.85

1.10

1.18

1.03

1.15

1.30

B) Bio-fertilization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

66.04d

75.79b

83.81a

71.07c

83.62d

94.74b

104.77a

88.84c

103.20d

118.40b

130.94a

111.05c

73.38d

84.21b

93.12a

78.97c

91.70d

105.23b

116.40a

98.41c

114.66d

131.59b

145.45a

123.40c

13.29d

15.16b

16.76a

14.34c

16.51d

18.94b

20.91a

17.77c

20.64d

23.75b

26.20a

22.22c

14.67d

16.76b

18.62a

15.78c

17.67d

21.05b

23.18a

19.74c

22.93d

26.35b

29.78a

24.67c

LSD 0.05

2.80

4.40

6.30

3.10

5.10

6.50

1.00

1.10

1.30

1.05

1.10

1.45

Interaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AxB

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

 

 

Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant  difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test 

     *: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

 

 

Table (6). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on shoots fresh weight/ plant (g) for moranga plant at three cuts during 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

Shoots fresh weight /plant (g)

2014 Season

2015 Season

Org.+mineral

Biofertilization

1stcut

2ndcut

3thcut

1stcut

2ndcut

3thcut

100% org.

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

72.57

83.29

92.10

78.10

90.72

104.11

115.13

97.63

11.42

130.16

143.81

121.98

80.64

92.54

102.33

86.78

100.80

115.80

127.92

108.48

126.00

144.60

159.90

185.60

75%org.+25%mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

80.64

92.84

102.34

86.76

100.30

115.68

127.92

108.48

126.00

144.44

159.90

85.60

89.60

102.88

113.70

96.42

114.66

128.20

142.13

120.53

140.00

160.66

177.66

150.66

50%org.+50%mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

65.31

74.95

92.88

70.29

81.65

93.70

103.61

87.83

102.06

117.13

129.52

109.84

72.57

83.28

92.10

78.10

90.91

104.11

115.12

97.63

113.40

130.14

143.64

122.04

25%org.+75%mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

58.78

67.46

74.59

63.26

73.82

84.32

93.25

79.08

91.86

105.42

116.57

98.86

65.31

74.95

88.88

70.29

81.65

93.65

103.60

87.86

102.06

117.12

129.51

109.83

100%mineral

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

52.90

60.73

67.14

56.94

66.13

75.89

83.92

71.71

82.66

94.87

104.91

88.97

58.78

67.46

74.59

63.26

73.48

84.99

93.25

79.08

91.85

105.41

116.56

98.85

LSD 0.05

3.30

5.40

6.50

3.50

5.70

7.40

 

Table (7). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on shoots dry weight/ plant (g) for moranga plants at three cuts during 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

Shoots dry weight /plant

2014 Season

2015 Season

Org. + mineral

Biofertilization

1st cut

2ndcut

3th cut

1st cut

2nd cut

3th cut

100%org.

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

14.52

16.65

18.41

15.61

18.14

20.82

23.02

19.52

22.68

26.03

28.78

24.41

16.13

18.50

20.46

17.35

20.16

23.13

25.58

21.69

25.20

28.92

31.98

27.12

75%org.+25%mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

16.12

18.51

20.46

17.35

20.16

23.13

25.58

21.69

25.20

28.92

31.98

27.14

17.91

20.56

22.74

19.28

22.40

25.70

28.42

24.10

28.00

32.26

35.53

30.13

50 % org.+50%mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

13.06

14.99

16.57

14.06

16.33

18.73

20.72

17.57

20.41

23.43

25.90

21.96

14.51

16.65

18.41

15.62

14.80

20.81

23.02

19.52

22.67

26.02

28.78

24.40

25%org.+75%mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

11.75

13.49

14.92

12.65

14.69

16.86

18.65

15.82

18.37

21.41

23.31

19.79

13.06

14.99

16.52

14.05

16.32

18.74

20.72

17.57

20.41

23.45

25.40

21.90

100%mineral

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

10.58

12.14

13.42

11.38

13.22

15.18

16.78

14.23

16.54

18.97

21.03

17.79

11.75

13.49

14.91

12.62

14.69

16.86

18.64

15.81

18.37

21.08

26.70

19.76

LSD (0.05)

1.08

1.15

1.28

1.06

1.20

1.47

B)   Chemical composition

Data presented in Tables (8 and 9) indicated that organic manure plus mineral fertilizers significantly affected nitrogen (%), phosphorus (%), potassium (%), protein (%), total carbohydrate (%) and vitamin (C) in both seasons. Application of 75% organic manure + 25% mineral; gave rise the highest mean values of all studied chemical composition parameters  as compared with application 100 % mineral fertilizer in both seasons.

The increment in chemical composition of moringa leaves using the treatments of organic manure may be owing attributed to increase in the occupancy root zone of plant result of adding organic manure which reflected on N, P and K uptake by plant and confirm the pervious of vegetative growth. Similar results were obtained by Prabhakar and Hebbar (2007), Adebayo et al. (2011) on Moringa oleifera, Makinde (2013) on moringa plant and Attia et al. (2014) on moringa plant.

Concerning the bio-fertilization, treatments in Tables (8 and 9) revealed that inoculation moringa plants with bio-fertilization, increased all the studied of chemical composition in both seasons compared to uninoculated moringa (control).

It can, also, be suggested to use combined biofertilizer including phosphorein, A- mycorrhizal and cerealine biofertilizer including all biofertilizer to produce a high quality moringa trees. Several reports on biofertilizer utilization have emphasized that a single inoculation showed higher productivity than uninoculation treatment (control). Shah et al. (2006), Attia et al. (2014) and Mazher et al. (2014).

 The interaction between combination organic manure and mineral and bio-fertilization were significant for N, P and K % in both seasons (Table 10). Application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral, gave the highest mean values of N% with cerealine, P% with phosphorein and K% with A- mycorrhizal inoculation as compared with was uninoculation treatment.

 

The significant differences for the interaction between combination organic manure plus mineral and bio-fertilization in both seasons due to application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral, brought about the greatest protein percentage with treatment of cerealine biofertilizer and total carbohydrate (%), vitamin (C) with A- mycorrhizal in both seasons (Table 11).

 

In conclusion, some organs of moringa are good source important minerals and these plants might be explored as a viable supplement and ready source of dietary minerals in animal and human food. There was a significant variation in macro and microelements in moringa leaves. Also, the application of 75% organic manure+ 25% mineral gave the highest vegetative growth and chemical composition with A- mycorrhizal inoculation.

 

 

Table (8). Nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium percentages as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilization in 2014 and 2015 seasons.

 

Treatments

2014 Season

2015 Season

N %

P %

K %  

N %

P %

K %  

A)Mineral + Organic

 

 

 

 

 

 

100% Organic

75% org. + 25% mineral

50 % org. + 50% mineral

25% org. +75% mineral

100% mineral

2.91b

3.22a

2.62c

2.35d

2.12e

0.400b

0.450a

0.360c

0.320d

0.290e

2.35b

2.61a

2.11c

1.91d

1.96d

3.23b

3.61a

2.91c

2.61d

2.35e

0.448b

0.498a

0.403c

0.355d

0.318e

2.61b

2.90a

2.33c

2.12d

2.17d

LSD 0.05

0.10

0.012

0.11

0.11

0.040

0.19

B) Bio-fertilization

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

2.19c

2.57b

2.67b

3.16a

0.250d

0.472a

0.410b

0.326c

2.04d

2.15c

2.40a

2.25b

2.43c

2.85b

2.92b

3.51a

0.280d

0.520a

0.452b

0.364c

2.16c

2.38b

2.66a

2.48b

LSD 0.05

0.11

0.015

0.08

0.12

0.050

0.17

Interaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

AxB

*

*

*

*

*

*

Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test 

 *: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

Table (9). Protein (%), vitamin (C)and total carbohydrate (%)as affected by mineral-organic and biofertilization in 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

2014  Season

2015 Season

Protein %

Vitamin (C) mg/100

 ml juice

Total carbohydrate %  

Protein %

Vitamin (C) mg/100 ml juice

Total carbohydrate %  

A)    Mineral + Organic

100% Organic

75% org.+25% mineral50%org.+50%mineral

25% org.75% mineral

100% mineral

18.60b

20.22a

16.36c

14.71d

13.25e

0.526b

0.584a

0.467c

0.420d

0.409d

19.79b

22.06a

17.87c

16.10d

14.47e

20.20b

22.47a

18.18c

16.34d

14.70e

0.584b

0.648a

0.519c

0.467d

0.454d

22.06h

24.51a

19.85c

17.87d

16.08e

LSD 0.05

1.10

0.35

1.30

1.20

0.052

1.45

B) Bio-fertilization

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

14.02c

16.05b

16.67b

19.70a

0.449d

0.497b

0.514a

0.466c

14.27d

19.02b

22.03a

16.90c

15.20c

17.83b

18.51b

21.95a

0.497c

0.552a

0.570a

0.518b

15.85d

21.14b

24.54a

18.78c

LSD (0.05)

1.20

0.015

1.50

1.30

0.040

1.90

Interaction

 

 

 

 

 

 

AxB

*

*

*

*

*

*

Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference at 5% level using (L.S.D.) test 

*: Significant at 0.05 level of probability.

 

 

Table (10). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on macronutrients (N, P and K %) for moranga plants in 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

N%

P%

K%

 

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

 

Org. + mineral

Biofertilization

 

100% Org.

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

2.41

2.83

2.93

3.48

2.67

3.13

3.25

3.66

0.28

0.52

0.45

0.36

0.31

0.58

0.50

0.40

2.13

2.36

2.64

2.27

2.36

2.62

2.93

2.51

 

75% org. + 25% mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

2.68

3.14

3.26

5.86

2.97

3.49

3.62

4.29

0.30

0.59

0.50

0.40

0.34

0.65

0.55

0.45

2.87

2.62

2.93

2.53

2.63

2.91

3.26

2.80

 

50 % org. + 50% mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

2.16

2.54

2.64

3.13

2.40

2.82

2.93

3.47

0.25

0.47

0.40

0.32

0.28

0.52

0.45

0.36

1.92

2.12

2.37

2.04

2.13

2.33

2.63

2.21

 

25% org. +75% mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

1.94

2.28

2.37

2.81

2.16

2.54

2.63

3.12

0.22

0.41

0.57

0.29

0.25

0.45

0.40

0.32

1.73

1.91

2.13

1.85

1.92

2.12

2.37

2.05

 

100% mineral

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

1.75

2.06

2.13

2.53

1.94

2.28

2.37

2.81

0.20

0.37

0.33

0.26

0.22

0.40

0.36

0.29

1.57

1.75

1.92

2.58

1.74

1.94

2.13

2.86

 

LSD (0.05)

0.13

0.15

0.017

0.06

0.14

0.20

 

 

Table (11). Interaction between mineral+organic and biofertilization on Protein %, Vitamin (C) and Total carbohydrate %for moranga plants in 2014 and 2015 seasons.

Treatments

Protein (%)

Vitamin (C)

( mg/100 ml juice )

Total carbohydrate (%)

 

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

 

Org. + mineral

Biofertilization

 

100% Org.

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

16.72

17.64

18.32

21.73

16.72

19.60

20.35

24.14

0.488

0.543

0.562

0.509

0.543

0.604

0.624

0.566

15.68

20.89

24.00

18.57

17.42

23.22

26.97

20.64

 

75% org. + 25% mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

16.74

19.63

20.36

24.16

18.60

21.81

22.62

26.85

0.542

0.604

0.624

0.566

0.603

0.671

0.688

0.629

17.42

23.22

26.47

20.64

19.36

25.80

29.96

22.93

 

50 % org. +50% mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

13.53

15.88

16.49

19.55

15.03

17.64

18.31

21.77

0.434

0.482

0.494

0.452

0.483

0.536

0.554

0.503

14.11

18.80

21.84

16.72

15.68

20.89

24.27

18.57

 

25% org. +75% mineral

 

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

12.16

14.28

14.83

17.57

13.61

15.87

16.47

19.52

0.396

0.434

0.450

0.407

0.434

0.482

0.499

0.452

12.70

16.98

19.66

15.04

14.11

18.80

21.84

16.71

 

100% mineral

Uninoculation

Phosphorein

Mycorrhizal

Cerealine

10.93

12.84

13.33

15.80

12.14

14.27

14.81

17.56

0.380

0.422

0.436

0.396

0.422

0.469

0.480

0.440

11.43

15.23

17.69

13.54

12.09

16.91

19.66

15.04

 

LSD (0.05)

1.22

1.33

0.040

0.055

1.35

1.96

 
References
REFERENCES

Abou El-Fadi, M., S. G. Rizk, A. F. Abdel Ghani, M. K. El-Mofty, M. E. A.  Khadr, S. M. Shehata nd F. A. Farg (1968).Utilization of water hyacinth as an organic manure with special reference to water-brone helminthes. J. Microbial A.R.F., 3(1):27-34.

Adebayo, A.G., H.A. Akintoye, O.O. Olufolaji, M.T. Aina, M.T. Olatunji and A.O. Shokalu (2011). Assessment of organic amendments on vegetative development and nutrient uptake of Moringa oleifera Lam in the nursery. Asian J. Plant Sci., 10(1):74-79.

Adeoye, D. A. and A. A. Aghools (2005). Critical level of soil plant available P, K, Zn, Mg, Cu and Mn on maize leaf content of sedimentary soil of South West Nigeria. Fert. Res., 6: 66-71.

Anjorin, T. S., P. Ikokoh nd S. Okolo (2010). Mineral composition of Moringa oleifera leaves, pods and seed from two regions in AbujaNigeria. Int. J. Agric. & Biol., 3:431-434.

AOAC  (1990). Official method of analysis, fifteenth ed. association of official analytical chemists, Virginia, USA.

AOAC (1984). Official Method of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14thed,Published by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, PO Box,540, Benjamin Franklin Station, Washington, dc.20044.

Attia, M. F., M.F.M. Shahin, M.A. Merwad, E. S. El-Hady and L. F. Haggag (2014). Effect of mineral, organic and bio-fertilization on productivity of moringa plant under saline conditions in North Sinai. Mid. East J. Appl. Sci., 4(4): 825-832.

Chapman, H. D. and P.F. Pratt (1978). Method of Analysis for Soil and Water. 2nd Ed., Chapter, 17:150-161. Uni. Calif. Div. Agric. Sci. USA.

Dania, S. O.; P. Akpansubi and O. O. Eghagara (2014). Comparative effects of different fertilizer sources on the growth and nutrient content of moringa (Moringa oleifera) seedling in a greenhouse trial. Adv. Agric., 1-6

Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez (1984). Statistical procedure for agricultural research, jhon willey and sons. Inc. New York.

Ismali, A. G., E. M. Desouky, Y. Gomal, M. Gall, A. A. Arafa and Abou-Seer (2009). Effect of biofertilizers and organic phosphorus mendments on growth and essential oil of marjoram. Egypt Acad. J. Biol. Sci., 1(1):29-30.

Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India. Private Limited, New Delhi, India, pp. 183–192.

Lowther, J. R. (1980). Use of a single sulphuric-hydrogen peroxide digest for the analysis of Pinus radiate needles. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 11: 175–188.S

Makinde, A. I. (2013). Effects of inorganic fertilizer on the growth and nutrient composition of moringa (Moringa oleifera). J. Emer. Trend Eng. & Appl. Sci., 4(2): 341–343.

Manorama, S., S. Paulsamy and D. Suresh (2007). Evaluation of seedlings of six tree species in lime mined soil by using some amendments. Range Manag. & Agrofor., 28(1): 21-24.

Mazher, A. A. M., N. G. Abdel-Aziz, R. S. El-Dabh, M. A. El-Khateeb and A. A. Abd El-Badaie (2014). Effect of Bio Fertilization on Growth and Constituents of Moringa oleifera Lam. Plants. Middle East J. Agric. Res., 3(4): 793-798.

Morton, J. F. (1991). The horseradish tree, Moringa pterygosperma (Moringaceae) a boon to arid lands. Econ. Bot., 45: 318-333.

Prabhakar, M. and S.S.Hebbar (2007). Studies on organic production technology of annual drumstick in a semiarid agro-ecosystem. ISHS Acta Hort., 752(1): 117, Hyderabad, India.

Rajendrn, K., V. Sugavanam and P. Devaraj(2000). Influence of biofertilizers on the biomss production of Cassuasin equisetifolia farm forestry. Bngladish J. Forest Sci., 29(1):26-36.

Shah, S. K.; R. P. Shah; H. L. Xu and U. K. Aryal (2006). Biofertilizers: an alternative source of nutrients for sustainable production of tree crops. J. Sustainable Agric., 29(2): 85-95.

Yemm, E.W. and A. J. Willis (1954). The estimation of carbohydrate in extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J., 57: 508 – 514.

Statistics
Article View: 173
PDF Download: 341
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.