Document Type : Research papers
Authors
1 Plant Production Dept., Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University
2 Medicinal and Aromatic Res.Dept., A.R.C. Alexandria, Egypt
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
INTRODUCTION
Coriandrum sativum L. (coriander)Fam.Apiaceae is an important fresh culinary herb in the United States, widely used in Mexican, African and Asian cuisines (Cantwell and Reid, 1993). It is used as a spice in a wide variety of foods. The pungent leaves are called ''cilantro'' a basic ingredient in Latin American and Asian cooking. The leaves (cilantro) have a bold taste, combining a strong sage flavor with sharp-citrus noted. The roots are similar with an added nutty flavor and are used fresh only. The seeds of coriander have a taste of citrus and are used in medicinal house hold cosmetics and fragrance (Rashed, 2002).
Fertilization is one of the most important factors limiting the productivity of plants. The intensive use of expensive mineral fertilizers results in environmental pollution problems. Further, chemical fertilizers at extremely high rates to a long period decreased the potential activity of microflora and the stability of soil organic matter (Hussien, 1995).Also, bio-fertilization is an important factor being used to produce products without some mineral fertilizer that cause environmental pollution problems. Hence, the attention has been focused on the recreates of biofertilizers to safe alternative specific chemical fertilizers. Biofertilizers play a vital role for increasing the number of microorganisms and accelerate certain microbial process in the rhizosphere of inoculated soil of plants (Kandeel et al., 2001;Rashed, 2002; Mohamed andAbdu, 2004). This research, however, is an attempt to find out the best fertilization treatments (mineral NPK and biofertilizer on the vegetative growth, yield and chemical composition of corianderplants (Coriandrum sativum L.).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two filed experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm of the Nubaria station, El-beharia, Egypt during both seasons of2013/2014 and 2014/2015, to study the effect of NPK, biofertilizer and their interaction on the growth,yield, chemical composition of coriander plants(Coriandrum sativum L.). The experimental design followed in this work was a split plot design with three replicates.where as the chemical fertilizers were arranged as maim plots and biofertilizers were arranged as sub plots. The replicate contain 20 treatments. The coriander seeds were sown on November 11th and 12thduring both growing seasons. Each sub plot in both experimental seasons was 3.5 meters long and 3 meter wide (10.5 m2 i.e. 1/400 feddan) contained 10 rows 25 cm apart between plants. The applied chemical fertilizer were ammonium sulphate (20.5% N), calcium superphosphate (15.5%P2O5) and potassium sulphate (48% K2O) at the rates of (100, 100 and 50 kg/fed), respectively which are the recommended dose. The used biofertilization of bacteria was phosphorein (Bacillus megatherium phosphorus dissoliving bacteria P. D.B.), potassiomage biofertilizer contains of Bacillus mucilaginousas a potassium dissolving bacteria (KDB) or potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB) and cerealine (Azosprillum lipoferum and Azotobacter chroococcum) which supplied by Natioal Research Center. The inoculation with phosphorein, potassiomage and cerealine were performed by coating coriander seed with each product individually using a sticking substance (Arbic gum at 5%) just before sowing. The recommended dose of NPK was divided into two equal parts, the first one was applied one month after sowing and the second one was applied before the first irrigation. The tested treatments were conducted as follows:
A) NPK fertilizer (Main plot)
B) Biofertilization (sub plot)
The physical and chemical characteristics of the experimental soil are given in Table (1) .The soil was analyzed according to the methods described by Page et al. (1982). At harvest dates on April 8th and 10thduring the two seasons, guarded plants were randomly taken from each plot and the following characteristics were recorded:
1.Plant height (cm)
2.Number of branches
3.Fresh and dry weight (g)/plant
4.Number of umbles/plant
5.100-seed weight (g)
6.Seed yield (g)/plant
7.Seed yield (ton/fed)
9.The N, P and K contents were determined in the leaves which were driedat 70°C for 48hr., and ground leaves (0.5 g) were digested with sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide H2SO4. H2O2 according to the method of Lowther (1980) and the following determination were carried out in the digested solution to determine the following:
Nitrogen was determined in the digested plant material colorimetrically by Nessler`smethod(Chapman and Pratt, 1978).
Phosphorus was determined by the Vanadomolyate yellow methodas given by Jackson (1973) and the intensity of color developed was read by spectrophotometer at 405nm.
Potassium was determined according to the method described by Jackson (1973) using Beckman Flame photometer.
The obtained data were analyzed statistically for ANOVA and L.S.D. values were calculated to least differences between the studied treatments according to Gomez and Gomez (1984).
Table (1). Physical and chemical analysis of the used soil before planting (average of 2013/2014 and 2014/2015seasons.
Unit |
Sample |
Parameter |
Mechanical Analysis |
||
% |
67 |
Sand |
% |
16 |
Silt |
% |
17 |
Clay |
|
Sandy loam |
Textural class |
- |
7.55 |
pH (1:1) |
dS/m |
3.3 |
EC(1:1, water extract) |
% |
0.32 |
OM |
Soluble cations |
||
meq/l |
9.52 |
Ca2+ |
meq/l |
8.16 |
Mg2+ |
meq/l |
11.76 |
Na+ |
meq/l |
1.28 |
K+ |
Soluble anions |
||
meq/l |
2.7 |
HCO3- |
meq/l |
7.5 |
Cl- |
meq/l |
11.73 |
SO42- |
Available nutrients |
||
mg/kg |
267.7 |
Nitrogen (N) |
mg/kg |
41.00 |
Phosphorus (P) |
mg/kg |
300.0 |
Potassium (K) |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A) Growth parameters and yield
Data in Tables (2 and 3) revealed that the fertilization treatment of 100 % NPK gave, significantly, the highest plant height, number of braches/plant, fresh and dry weight (g)/plant, number of umbles, 100-seed weight, seed yield (g)/plant and seed yield (ton)/fed, while, the least growth parameters and yield was obtained from the control treatment during both seasons. It could be concluded that, the role of available mineral nutrition as essential elements in building coriander umbles due to the positive effect of NPK in increasing the vegetative growth photosynthetic, as well as, the increasing seed yield (ton)/fed. These results coincided with those obtained by El-Mahrouk (2000) on Swietteina mahogany seedling, reported that 120+ 240 + 120 kg NPK/fed and 24 l/day; gave the highest significant plant growth, also, Reshad (2002)recorded similar trendon coriander, too.
The obtained results given in Tables (2 and 3)decleared that biofertilizers treatments exhibited a significant effect on all estimated traits during both seasons. Inoculation of mixture biofertilizer (phosphorein + cerealine + potassiomage) significantly increased growth parameters and yield. This finding could explain this positive effect of this mixture on growth characters and some yield in response to the phosphate potassium solubilizing bacteria and N-fixing bacteria (cerealine) where this mixture may increase the synthesis of endogenous phytohormones i.e. indol acetic acid (IAA), gibberelline (GAS) and cytokinene(CKs) which play an important role in formation of a big active shoot and root systems which allow more nutrition uptake which reflect positively on both systems. The previous results agree, more or less, with the findings of Gad (2001) on Aneithum graveolens, Rashed (2002) on coriander, Abdel Latif (2002) on Cariumcarvi and Kandee let al. (2001) and Mohamed and Abdu (2004) on Foeniculumvulgare.
Tables(4 and 5) declared that the interaction between NPK fertilizer and biofertilization was significant on all growth parameters and yield. The superiority effect of applying 100% NPK plus interaction mixture of bio-fertilizerswas noticeable to plant height, number of braches/plant, fresh and dry weight,s (g)/plant, number of umbles, 100-seed weight, seed yield (g)/plant and seed yield (ton)/fed.
Table (2).Plant height, number of branches, fresh and dry weight,sas affected by some macroelement,sand bio-fertilization during 2013 /2014 and2014 / 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Plant height (cm) |
Number of branches/plant |
Fresh weight/plant(g) |
Dry weight/plant (g) |
||||
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
|
A) NPKfertilizer |
|
|||||||
Control 50% NPK 75% NPK 100% NPK L.S.D.(0.05) |
86.32d 104.93c 111.84b 113.47a 1.10 |
92.33c 112.75b 119.79a 121.28a 1.05 |
7.30c 10.80b 11.57a 11.93a 0.50 |
7.97c 12.00b 12.87c 13.20a 0.60 |
354.50d 536.37c 609.83b 634.51a 10.70 |
385.42c 681.41a 657.7b 681.83a 12.30 |
69.65d 103.38c 120.39b 128.06a 2.90 |
79.43d 119.60c 131.18b 138.14a 3.20 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|||||||
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed L.S.D.(0.05) |
96.26d 103.32c 106.43b 105.95b 108.80a 1.20 |
104.07d 110.25c 114.61b 113.74b 117.38a 1.30 |
8.13d 9.12c 11.13b 9.25c 13.58a 0.70 |
9.25d 10.79c 12.33b 10.38c 14.92 0.85 |
400.27d 516.59c 560.57b 527.16c 627.80a 11.20 |
448.25e 584.19c 605.58b 567.80d 675.79a 12.60 |
83.44e 108.40c 113.77b 104.88d 124.77a 3.10 |
94.13d 118.63c 123.88b 114.88c 134.78a 4.60 |
Interactions |
|
|||||||
Ax B |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least Significant difference (L.S.D.)
*: Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability.
Table (3).Number of umbles, 100-seed weight, seed yield plant and seed yield fed as affected by some macroelement,s and bio-fertilization during 2013 /2014 and 2014 / 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Number of umblers/plant |
100-seed weight (g) |
Seed yield (g)/plant |
Seed yield (ton)/fed |
||||
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
|
A) NPKfertilizer |
|
|||||||
Control 50% NPK 75% NPK 100% NPK L.S.D.(0.05) |
104.43d 157.07c 175.97b 180.05a 2.75 |
114.94d 172.59c 191.84b 197.83a 4.20 |
1.45c 1.55b 1.58b 1.62a 0.03 |
1.46c 1.57b 1.61b 1.66a 0.04 |
73.40c 82.51b 89.66a 90.37b 1.05 |
79.71d 88.50c 94.30b 96.54a 1.10 |
0.880d 0.967c 1.064b 1.085a 0.018 |
0.955d 1.062c 1.135b 1.158a 0.020 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|||||||
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed L.S.D.(0.05) |
133.23e 144.59c 164.66b 138.39d 201.16a 5.50 |
134.79d 158.39c 180.82b 153.57c 218.97a 5.70 |
1.49d 1.52c 1.56b 1.58ab 1.60a 0.02 |
1.51d 1.55c 1.58bc 1.61ab 1.63a 0.03 |
79.51e 80.58d 83.66c 86.84b 88.12a 0.92 |
85.11e 86.70d 89.07c 91.88b 96.07a 1.05 |
0.925e 0.967d 1.004c 1.042b 1.057a 0.012 |
1.021e 1.040d 1.071c 1.102b 1.151a 0.018 |
Interactions |
|
|||||||
Ax B |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least Significant difference (L.S.D.)
*: Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability.
Table (4). Interaction between NPK fertilizer and biofertilization on fresh and dry weights/plant during 2013 /2014 and 2014 /2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Fresh weight (g) |
Dry weight (g) |
|||
NPK fertilizer |
Bio-fertilization |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
Control
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
311.20 354.47 362.10 339.47 405.33 |
343.44 381..64 393.05 366.90 439.06 |
57.87 71.17 73.00 67.40 78.83 |
67.33 81.50 83.00 76.60 88.70 |
50% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
354.40 352.53 568.13 562.40 644.37 |
392.02 597.07 615.64 606.23 697.57 |
79.57 113.43 116.00 111.23 126.67 |
89.60 123.40 127.00 122.20 136.70 |
75% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
473.87 614.93 653.87 592.67 708.80 |
513.23 644.44 706.18 636.50 768.13 |
95.17 119.83 133.40 116.10 140.47 |
105.20 129.90 143.50 126.40 150.60 |
100% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
501.60 644.27 658.14 614.13 754.40 |
544.31 693.60 707.46 661.55 798.39 |
101.13 129.17 132.67 124.20 153.10 |
111.40 139.20 142.70 154.30 163.10 |
L.S.D.(0.05) |
11.80 |
12.20 |
3.70 |
4.90 |
Table (5). Interaction between NPK fertilizer and biofertilization on 100-seed weight and seed yield during 2013/2014 and2014 / 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
100-seed weight (g) |
Seed yield (g)/plant |
|||
NPK fertilizer |
Bio-fertilization |
2013/2014 |
2014/2015 |
2013/2014 |
2014/2015 |
Control
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
1.40 1.44 1.47 1.47 1.48 |
1.42 1.45 1.47 1.48 1.50 |
70.31 70.55 75.12 76.88 73.83 |
75.73 77.03 80.43 82.07 83.30 |
50% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
1.50 1.51 1.57 1.59 1.56 |
1.50 1.53 1.58 1.61 1.63 |
76.47 77.84 80.39 87.33 90.51 |
83.44 83.98 86.84 91.74 96.48 |
75% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
1.51 1.55 1.58 1.60 1.65 |
1.5 1.58 1.63 1.65 1.66 |
84.62 85.63 88.04 91.18 92.83 |
89.39 91.44 93.76 96.56 100.35 |
100% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
1.55 1.58 1.60 1.66 1.70 |
1.59 1.62 1.65 1.69 1.73 |
86.63 88.01 91.10 91.83 94.30 |
91.89 94.33 95.23 97.14 104.10 |
L.S.D.(0.05) |
0.03 |
0.04 |
1.30 |
1.45 |
B) Total chlorophyll and Chemical composition
Data in Table (6) showed the effect of NPKfertilizer and biofertilization on total chlorophyll, N%, P% and K% in the leaves during the bothseasons.As for the effect of NPK fertilization obtained data showed that the treatment of 100 % NPK, gavethe highest total chlorophyll (1.864 and 1.378 (mg/g F.W.)N ( 2.29 and 2.33%), P (0.599 and 1.592%) andK(5.19 and 5.69%),for the both seasons respectively while theleasttotal chlorophyll, and N, P and K% were obtained from the control treatment during bothseasons. Results in Table (6) declared that thetotal chlorophylland chemical compositionincreased due to using all different commercial bio-fertilizers when compared to the uninoculation (control) treatment with significant differences in the most traits during both season. However, the highest mean values of chemical composition during both seasons were observed due to inoculation by the mixture biofertilizer. On the other hand, bio-fertilizers treatment resulted in the highest values of all studied parameters in comparison to the other treatments during both seasons. Hence, it could be concluded that these findings may be taken place due to that the active role of phosphorus, potassium dissolving bacteria and N-fixation (cerealine) and increasing the endogenous phytohormones as reported earlier which play an important rolesin life cycles of both shoot and root systems.
These obtained results are in compatible with those obtained by Kandeel et al. (2001) on Foeniculum vulgare and Osman (2000) on coriander. The interaction between NPKf ertilizer and biofertilization was significant on alltraits during both seasons (Table 7), whereas, theapplication of 100 % NPK and mixturebiofertilization on root zone of plant as result of adding fertilization treatments reflected positively on nutrients uptake by plants and confirm the previous vegetative growth. Similar results, more or less, were obtained by Aly (1994) on saponaria. Also, Jacoub (1999) on Ocimum basilicum, found that as all NPK rates increased; chemical compositionin the leaves and stem increased.
Table (6).Total chl. and N, P and K% as affected by some macroelements and bio-fertilization during during 2013/2014 and 2014 / 2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Total chlorophyll (mg/g) |
N% |
P% |
K% |
||||
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
2014 |
2015 |
|
A) NPKfertilizer |
|
|||||||
Control 50% NPK 75% NPK 100% NPK L.S.D.(0.05) |
0.875d 1.069c 1.195b 1.364a 0.080 |
0.884d 1.079c 1.207b 1.378a 0.087 |
1.16d 1.47c 1.83b 2.29a 0.20 |
1.21d 1.49c 1.88b 2.33a 0.25 |
0.334d 0.478c 0.537b 0.599a 0.055 |
0.352d 0.465c 0.531b 0.592a 0.057 |
2.36d 3.53c 4.35b 5.19a 0.45 |
3.05d 3.91c 4.81b 5.69a 0.40 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|||||||
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed L.S.D.(0.05) |
1.017d 1.106c 1.176b 1.076c 1.256a 0.075 |
1.026d 1.117c 1.188b 1.086c 1.267a 0.072 |
1.44d 1.67c 1.80b 1.67c 1.89a 0.07 |
1.49d 1.69c 1.83b 1.70c 1.92a 0.07 |
0.402d 0.508b 0.485c 0.445c 0.582a 0.060 |
0.335d 0.542b 0.501b 0.451c 0.583a 0.065 |
3.52d 3.74cd 3.99b 4.29a 4.35a 0.22 |
3.85c 4.13b 4.28b 4.71a 4.84a 0.19 |
Interactions |
|
|||||||
Ax B |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least Significant difference (L.S.D.)
*: Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability.
Table (7).Total chl. and N, P, and K% as effected by Interaction between NPK fertilizer and bio-fertilizer sources during 2013 / 2014 and 2014 /2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Total Chlorophyll (mg/g F.W.) |
N (%) |
P (%) |
K (%) |
|||||
NPK fertilizer |
Bio-fertilization |
2013/2014 |
2014/2015 |
2013/2014 |
2014/2015 |
2013/2014 |
2014/2015 |
2013/2014 |
2014/2015 |
Control
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
0.765 0.852 0.903 0.827 1.028 |
0.772 0.861 0.912 0.837 1.034 |
1.00 1.14 1.23 1.21 1.24 |
1.08 1.16 1.28 1.21 1.29 |
0.247 0.354 0.350 0.317 0.400 |
0.267 0.401 0.344 0.340 0.407 |
2.30 2.59 2.81 3.00 3.10 |
2.50 2.94 3.09 3.30 3.40 |
50% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
0.962 1.069 1.134 1.035 1.140 |
0..972 1.076 1.147 1.046 1.152 |
1.29 1.44 1.54 1.50 1.60 |
1.22 1.47 1.57 1.53 1.64 |
0.384 0.504 0.477 0.447 0.574 |
0.307 0.534 0.490 0.440 0.551 |
3.17 3.23 3.36 3.92 3.99 |
3.49 3.57 3.68 4.34 4.48 |
75% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
1.108 1.183 1.263 1.153 1.266 |
1.118 1.197 1.276 1.161 1.282 |
1.56 1.81 1.93 1.72 2.12 |
1.62 1.85 1.98 1.80 2.18 |
0.480 0.544 0.520 0.494 0.644 |
0.354 0.587 0.540 0.474 0.647 |
3.82 4.09 4.18 4.81 4.83 |
4.18 4.48 4.59 5.35 5.42 |
100% NPK
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed |
1.231 1.319 1.401 1.287 1.587 |
1.242 1.332 1.417 1.298 1.599 |
1.92 2.27 2.46 2.23 2.56 |
2.00 2.29 2.48 2.27 2.58 |
0.497 0.627 0.590 0.520 0.707 |
0.410 0.644 0.627 0.550 0.727 |
4.79 5.01 5.27 5.39 5.47 |
5.23 5.53 5.74 5.86 6.07 |
L.S.D.(0.05) |
0.084 |
0.090 |
0.29 |
0.30 |
0.064 |
0.068 |
0.48 |
0.43 |
C) Major components percentage of essential oil
The effect of NPK fertilization treatments and biofertilization on essential oil of major components (Linalool, α-2-deenol, α- Pinene, Camphor and Geraniol) percentages are shown in Table (8). The recorded results indicated that using application 75 % NPKfertilization treatments had thehighest values for the studiedmajor components percentage of coriander oil in the sameTable. The interaction with potassiomage and mixture biofertilizer, brought about gave the highest percentage of major components in 2014 / 2015season.Similarresults were reported by Darzi et al. (2011) on anisum and Khalil (2008) on Foeniculum vulgare.
The highest values were produced by applied at 75 % NPK with inoculation of potassmage and mixed biofertilizer (Table8).
Table (8). Major components percentage as affected by mineral and bio-fertilization during 2014 /2015 seasons.
Treatments |
Linalool% |
α-2-deenol% |
α-Pinene% |
Camphor% |
Geraniol% |
A) NPK fertilizer |
|
|
|
|
|
Control 50% NPK 75% NPK 100% NPK L.S.D.(0.05) |
47.08d 48.31b 48.38a 48.01e 0.05 |
13.47d 15.00b 15.10a 14.89c 0.06 |
432c 4.53b 4.61a 4.59a 0.04 |
5.19c 5.54b 5.87a 5.88a 0.06 |
1.95 2.34 2.70 2.53 0.06 |
B) Bio-fertilization |
|
|
|
|
|
Uninoculation Phosphorein Cerealine Potassmage Mixed L.S.D.(0.05) |
47.95d 48.06c 48.11bc 48.32a 48.14b 0.06 |
14.58b 14.56b 14.64a 14.65a 14.67a 0.05 |
4.49c 4.50bc 4.52ab 4.53a 4.54a 0.02 |
5.46d 5.57c 5.64b 5.69ab 5.74a 0.05 |
2.20 2.35b 2.38 2.50a 2.49a 0.04 |
Interactions |
|
|
|
|
|
Ax B |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each factor designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least Significant difference (L.S.D.)
*: Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability.
Table (9). Interaction between mineral fertilizer and bio-fertilization on major components percentage in 2014 / 2015 seasons.
NPK fertilizer |
Bio-fertilization |
Linolool |
α-2-deenol |
α-Pinene |
camphor |
Geraniol |
Control
|
Uninoculation |
47.08 |
13.46 |
4.30 |
5.02 |
1.85 |
Phosphorein |
47.11 |
13.47 |
4.30 |
5.11 |
1.94 |
|
Cerealine |
47.30 |
13.47 |
4.33 |
5.23 |
1.96 |
|
Potassmage |
47.20 |
13.48 |
4.34 |
5.31 |
2.01 |
|
Mixed |
47.50 |
13.47 |
4.33 |
5.30 |
2.00 |
|
50% NPK
|
Uninoculation |
48.31 |
14.82 |
4.48 |
5.38 |
1.98 |
Phosphorein |
48.42 |
14.91 |
4.49 |
5.51 |
2.31 |
|
Cerealine |
48.48 |
15.02 |
4.53 |
5.51 |
2.38 |
|
Potassmage |
48.91 |
15.08 |
4.56 |
5.59 |
2.52 |
|
Mixed |
48.75 |
15.18 |
4.61 |
5.62 |
2.52 |
|
75% NPK |
Uninoculation |
48.38 |
15.11 |
4.59 |
5.63 |
2.45 |
Phosphorein |
48.41 |
15.03 |
4.61 |
5.73 |
2.60 |
|
Cerealine |
48.51 |
15.15 |
4.61 |
5.92 |
2.63 |
|
Potassmage |
48.83 |
15.11 |
4.63 |
5.95 |
2.91 |
|
Mixed |
48.61 |
15.11 |
4.62 |
6.14 |
2.89 |
|
100% NPK
|
Uninoculation |
48.01 |
14.91 |
4.59 |
5.81 |
2.51 |
Phosphorein |
48.31 |
14.82 |
4.59 |
5.92 |
2.53 |
|
Cerealine |
48.32 |
14.89 |
4.60 |
5.91 |
2.53 |
|
Potassmage |
48.31 |
14.91 |
4.60 |
5.90 |
2.54 |
|
Mixed |
48.31 |
14.92 |
4.59 |
5.88 |
2.56 |
|
L.S.D.(0.05) |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Fig (1). Typical chromatogram of Coriander oil