Document Type : Research papers
Authors
1 Nubaria Agriculture Research Station. Institute of sugar crops.
2 Plant Production Department. Faculty of Agriculture (Saba- Basha). Univ. Alexandria
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
INTRODUCTION
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) is one of the two crops (the older being sugar cane) which represent the important source of sucrose product. The importance of sugar beet crop to agriculture is not only confined to sugar production, but also it well known to be adapted to poor, saline, alkaline and calcareous soil.
The economic maybe increasing sugar productivity could be achieved through development appropriate new technology package for sugar beet crop that includes agronomic management to the yield and quality of sugar beet (Mokadem, 1993, Kandil et al., 2002 and Esmail and Abo El- Hamd, 2007).
Potassium plays a fundamental role in sucrose synthesis and storage. The influence of potassium not only on carbohydrate assimilation but also in nitrogen metabolism (Abdel Rahiman, 1996, El- Maghraby et al., 1998) mentioned that plant length, root diameter, root, top and sugar yield/fed, as well as sucrose and T.S.S. percentage significantly increased by increasing potassium level up to 48 kg K2O/fed. On the other hand, Hegazy et al. (1992), found that there was significant decrease in top and sugar yields by increasing potassium level from 0 up 45 kg K2O/fed and added that sucrose and purity percentage were not significantly affected by potassium rates.
The organic manure is known by enhancing soil physical properties by increasing the moisture holding capacity. In addition, it can change the chemical properties of soil through lowering pH and extensively their beneficial effects are known for long time. Application of organic matter provides many essential nutrients needed by plants. The increase in crop yield due to using of animal manure have been imperative many times as resulted manily from the nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium on the combination of the three mentioned elements (Negm et al., 2003). Zalat and Nemeat Allah (2001) reported that farmyard manure (FYM) increased sucrose% and T.S.S%.
Therefore, the investigation was designed to study the effect of potassium fertilization and organic manure on yield and quality of sugar beet crop.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two filed experiments were carried out through two successive season of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 at the Experimental farm Station Research, El- Nubaria, Buhyra, Egypt at the 71th Km West Alexandria- Cairo deresat road. To investigate the effect of potassium fertilizer and organic manure levels and their interaction of yield and quality on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris, L.) var. kumara.
Maize (Zea mays, L.) was the preceding for the two seasons. The experimental design was split plot design with three replicates. Potassium fertilization (zero, 20, 40 and 60 kg K2O/fed) occupied the main plots. The sub- plot were assigned to three organic manure (sheep catle manure) (Untreated, 5 and 10 m3/fed). Some physical and chemical properties of the experimental field soil and organic matter (farm yard manure) during the two seasons were done and the data are shown in Tables (1 and 2).
Potassium sulfate (48% K2O) was applied at how many rates. Nitrogen fertilizer was added in the form of ammonium nitrate (33.5%N) as a side dressing at the rate of 60 kg N/fed, in two equal parts, one after thinning (before the first irrigation and the other before the second irrigation. Calcium super phosphate (15.5% P2O5), was applied during tillage operation at the rate of 100 kg/fed. Seeds ball were hand sown at the usual dry sowing on one side of the redge in hills 25 cm apart at the rate of 4-5 seed ball per hill on 3rd and 14th September in 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons, respectively. The experimental basic unit area was 10.5 m2 (1/400 feddan) and includes 6 redges each of which 50 cm width and 3 meter length.
At harvest (200 days after sowing) five plants were chosen at random from the iner redges of each sub- plot to estimate yield components and quality characters as follows:
Table (1). some physical and chemical properties of the experimental soil in 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons
Soil properties |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
|
A- Mechanical analysis Sand% Clay% Silt% Soil texture |
85.70 6.30 8.00 sandy |
88.23 4.80 6.97 sandy |
|
B- Chemical analysis pH (1:1) EC (dS/m) |
8.50 1.20 |
7.35 1.14 |
|
1- Soluble cations (1:2) (cmol/kg soil) K+ Ca++ Mg++ Na++ |
0.82 2.76 1.90 4.35 |
1.20 3.10 2.30 4.65 |
|
2- Soluble anions (1:2) (cmol/kg soil) CO-3+ HCO-3 CL- SO-4 |
2.72 7.90 1.15 |
2.72 7.09 0.98 |
|
Calcium carbonate (%) |
6.12 |
6.72 |
|
Total nitrogen (mg/kg) |
33.00 |
23.00 |
|
Available Phosphorus (mg/kg) |
3.17 |
3.14 |
|
Organic matter (%) |
0.37 |
0.83 |
|
Table (2). Some chemical properties of farmyard manure
Analysis |
Values |
Moisture % |
27.00 |
O.M. % |
26.00 |
pH (1:1) |
7.20 |
N% |
2.06 |
P% |
3.13 |
K% |
1.48 |
C:N raito |
7.32:1 |
1- Top yield (ton/fed).
2- Root yield (ton/fed)
3- Biological yield (ton/fed).
4- Sugar yield (ton/fed).
5- Sucrose%: it was determing according to Mc Ginnu (1971).
6- Juice purity%: It was calculated according to Le – Decte (1927)
Sucrose%
Juice purity % = × 100
T.S.S.%
7- Total soluble solids (T.S.S.%)
Sucrose %
=
Purity%
Statistical analysis:
All collected data here subjected to the statistical and analysis following the procedure described by Gomez and Gomez (1984). The least significantly differences test (L.S.D.) at 0.05 was used to compare between means of the different treatments.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A- Effect of potassium fertilization on yield and quality:
Data presented in Tables (3 and 4) revealed that all character of yield and quality were significantly affected by potassium levels in both seasons. A gradual increase to root length, top yield/fed, root yield/fed, biological yield, sugar yield/fed, sucrose%, purity% and T.S.S.% increased as K- levels raised from 0 to 60 kg K2O/fed, in the both seasons. Such increase in root yield/fed, mounted by 28.13, 35.50 and 60.83% in the first season, being 20.56, 32.29 and 67.15% in the second season, as K- levels raised from 0 to 20 and 60 kg K2O/fed. Similar significant increase in sugar yield/fed, amounted to 45.83, 48.74% and 80% in the first season, being 29.24, 37.28 and 78.39% compared to control in the second season. These results could be attributed to the important role of potassium in physiological process in plant such as translocation of sugar and carbohydrates of assimilates from the top to the root (Ibrahim et al., 2002). Also, its role in nutritional balance, which increased organic compounds through phytosynthesis (El- Howary, 1999). Similar results were obtained by Mekki and El- Gazzar (1999), Omar et al. (2002) and Esmail and Abo El- Hamd (2007).
Data presented in Tables (3 and 4) showed that, root length, top yield/fed, root yield/fed, biological yield, sugar yield/fed, sucrose% purity% and T.S.S.% were affected significantly by tested organic manure during the two growing seasons. Application of 10 m3/fed, organic manure gave the tallest roots (32.75 and 35.33 cm) heaviest top yield/fed (9.70 and 7.75 ton), heaviest root yield (26.96 and 24.46 ton), heaviest biological yield/fed (35.8 and 32.26 ton), highest sugar yield (4.85 and 4.35 ton), highest sucrose% (18.25 and 17.59%) purity% (86.22 and 84.90%) and highest T.S.S.% (21.17 and 21.50%) in the first and second seasons, it could be concludes that treated of traits with organic fertilizer levels on increase yield and quality characters. This may be due to the role of microorganisms activity, phytohormones formation and translocation of the plant especially (IAA, Gas and CKs). Also, it has important role in increasing photosynthesis rate. These results are similar to those of Bassal et al (2001), Ali (2003) and Ibrahim (2007).
The interaction between potassium levels and organic manure levels had significant effect on all yield and quality character except purity% in both seasons. Application of 60 kg K2O/fed, gave the highest values for this traits except purity % treated with 10 m3/fed, resulted the maximum mean in both seasons Tables (4 and 6).Finally it could be concluded that under condition of this study the highest root and sugar yield/fed produced by application of 60 kg K2O/fed treated with 10 m3/fed
Table (3). Yield and its components as affected by potassium fertilizer and organic manure in 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons
Treatments |
Root length (cm) |
Top yield (ton/fed) |
Root yield (ton/fed) |
Biological yield (ton/fed) |
Sugar yield (ton/fed) |
|||||
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
|
A) K- fertilizer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
25.56d |
28.45c |
6.14c |
5.36d |
14.68c |
14.40d |
20.92d |
19.71d |
2.40c |
2.36c |
20 |
30.22c |
31.11b |
7.83b |
5.91c |
18.81b |
17.36c |
26.61c |
23.25c |
3.50b |
3.05b |
40 |
32.33b |
32.00b |
8.25b |
6.67b |
19.82b |
19.05b |
28.13b |
25.81b |
3.57b |
3.24b |
60 |
34.49a |
35.00a |
9.41a |
7.98a |
23.61a |
24.07a |
32.78a |
32.05a |
4.32a |
4.21a |
L0.S.D. (0.05) |
1.50 |
1.60 |
0.50 |
0.54 |
1.20 |
1.50 |
1.39 |
2.05 |
0.50 |
0. 55 |
B) Organic manure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
26.42c |
27.25c |
7.12b |
5.60b |
12.31c |
12.53c |
19.40c |
18.03c |
2.02c |
22.03c |
5 m3/fed |
30.75b |
32.34b |
6.91b |
6.12b |
18.43b |
19.18b |
25.13b |
25.26b |
3.24b |
3.23b |
10m3/fed |
33.75a |
35.33a |
9.70a |
7.72a |
26.96a |
24.46a |
36.80a |
32.26a |
4.95a |
4.39a |
L.S.D. (0.05) |
2.20* |
2.40* |
0.72* |
0.65* |
2.40* |
2.70* |
4.80* |
4.40* |
0.80* |
0.65* |
Interations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AxB |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
Means of each designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference L.S.D.
* Significant at 0.05 levels of probability
Table (4). Interaction between potassium fertilizer and organic manure in 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons on yield and components
Treatments |
Root length (cm) |
Top yield (ton/fed) |
Root yield (ton/fed) |
Biological yield (ton/fed) |
Sugar yield (ton/fed) |
||||||
Org. manure |
K- levels |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
Control |
control |
25.00 |
25.00 |
5.73 |
5.38 |
10.28 |
9.14 |
16.01 |
14.18 |
1.51 |
1.43 |
20 |
25.00 |
25.67 |
7.40 |
5.33 |
10.76 |
10.76 |
18.10 |
16.10 |
1.72 |
1.76 |
|
40 |
28.33 |
28.33 |
7.63 |
4.70 |
12.58 |
13.52 |
20.53 |
18.20 |
2.13 |
2.23 |
|
60 |
29.33 |
30.00 |
7.70 |
6.98 |
15.64 |
16.64 |
22.95 |
23.62 |
2.17 |
2.71 |
|
5 m3/fed
|
control |
25.00 |
26.67 |
5.76 |
5.43 |
12.30 |
13.95 |
18.04 |
19.38 |
2.01 |
2.23 |
20 |
31.00 |
32.67 |
6.84 |
6.18 |
17.82 |
17.82 |
24.67 |
23.86 |
3.21 |
3.09 |
|
40 |
33.33 |
33.33 |
6.44 |
6.44 |
18.18 |
18.86 |
34.61 |
25.30 |
3.21 |
3.14 |
|
60 |
33.67 |
36.67 |
8.09 |
6.43 |
25.08 |
26.09 |
33.21 |
32.51 |
4.53 |
4.44 |
|
10m3/fed |
control |
26.67 |
33.67 |
6.93 |
5.26 |
21.12 |
20.12 |
28.11 |
25.38 |
3.67 |
3.41 |
20 |
34.67 |
35.00 |
9.24 |
6.23 |
27.85 |
23.51 |
37.05 |
29.74 |
4.98 |
4.29 |
|
40 |
35.33 |
34.33 |
10.19 |
8.86 |
28.72 |
24.72 |
39.25 |
33.92 |
5.36 |
4.36 |
|
60 |
40.33 |
38.33 |
12.45 |
10.54 |
30.47 |
29.47 |
42.18 |
40.01 |
5.71 |
5.48 |
|
L.S.D. 0.05 |
2.30* |
2.50* |
0.80* |
0.85* |
2.50* |
2.75* |
3.70* |
4.20* |
0.95* |
0.70* |
Table (5). Sugar beet quality as affect by potassium fertilizer and organic manure in 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons
Treatments |
Sucrose % |
Purity % |
T.S.S. % |
|||
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
|
A) K- fertilizer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
16.00c |
16.45c |
81.12d |
80.03d |
19.89b |
19.89c |
20 |
17.33b |
16.89b |
83.20b |
81.20c |
20.78a |
21.00a |
40 |
17.78b |
17.22c |
82.70c |
81.70b |
20.55a |
20.55b |
60 |
18.11a |
17.33a |
83.80a |
82.40a |
20.86 |
21.33a |
L0.S.D. (0.05) |
0.38 |
0.35 |
0.40 |
0.42 |
0.50 |
0.45 |
B) Organicmanure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
16.25c |
16.25c |
84.20b |
82.60c |
20.09b |
20.20c |
5 m3/fed |
17.42b |
17.08b |
85.16ab |
83.40b |
20.08b |
20.58b |
10m3/fed |
18.25a |
17.59a |
86.22a |
84.90a |
21.17a |
21.50a |
L.S.D. (0.05) |
0.60* |
0.45* |
0.65* |
0.50* |
0.60* |
0.52* |
Interations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AxB |
* |
* |
ns |
ns |
* |
* |
Means of each designated by the same letter not significantly different at 5% using least significant difference L.S.D. * Significant at 0.05 levels of probability
Table (6). Interaction between potassium fertilizer and organic manure on quality of sugar beet in 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 seasons
Treatments |
Sucrose % |
Total soluble soild (T.S.S.%) |
|||
Org. manure |
K- levels |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
2014/2015 |
2015/2016 |
Control |
control |
14.67 |
15.67 |
20.00 |
19.33 |
20 |
16.00 |
16.33 |
20.67 |
20.33 |
|
40 |
17.00 |
16.67 |
20.00 |
20.00 |
|
60 |
17.33 |
16.33 |
19.67 |
20.33 |
|
5 m3/fed
|
control |
16.00 |
16.67 |
19.33 |
20.00 |
20 |
18.00 |
17.33 |
20.33 |
21.00 |
|
40 |
17.67 |
17.33 |
20.33 |
20.33 |
|
60 |
18.00 |
17.00 |
20.33 |
21.00 |
|
10m3/fed |
control |
17.33 |
17.00 |
20.33 |
20.33 |
20 |
18.00 |
17.67 |
21.33 |
21.67 |
|
40 |
18.67 |
17.67 |
21.00 |
21.33 |
|
60 |
19.00 |
18.67 |
22.00 |
22.67 |
|
L.S.D. 0.05 |
0.70* |
0.50* |
0.70* |
0.60* |