Metwally, O., T.F.M, A., SHAMA, S., Amer, M. (2023). Chemical and Biological Control of Pathogenic Fungi Associated with Imported Potato Tubers. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 28(4), 1010-1025. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.256887.1183
O. A.O Metwally; Abdel-Rahman T.F.M; S. SHAMA; M. Abd elAzeem Amer. "Chemical and Biological Control of Pathogenic Fungi Associated with Imported Potato Tubers". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 28, 4, 2023, 1010-1025. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.256887.1183
Metwally, O., T.F.M, A., SHAMA, S., Amer, M. (2023). 'Chemical and Biological Control of Pathogenic Fungi Associated with Imported Potato Tubers', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 28(4), pp. 1010-1025. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.256887.1183
Metwally, O., T.F.M, A., SHAMA, S., Amer, M. Chemical and Biological Control of Pathogenic Fungi Associated with Imported Potato Tubers. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2023; 28(4): 1010-1025. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.256887.1183
Chemical and Biological Control of Pathogenic Fungi Associated with Imported Potato Tubers
1Egyption Central Administration of plant quarantine (CAPQ) omarquarantine2022@outlook.com
2Ornamental, Medicinal & Aromatic Plants Dis. Res. Dept., Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, 12619, Giza, Egypt, E-mail: taghreed.fekry@arc.sci.eg https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3668-7337
3Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, University of Alexandria, P.O. Box 21531 Egypt
Abstract
Potatoes are a staple crop in Egypt and around the world, contributing significantly to human nutrition. However, during handling, transportation, and storage, potato tubers are particularly vulnerable to a variety of fungal diseases. Two pathogenic aggressive isolates associated with potato tuber seeds (Solanum tuberosum L.) fungi namely Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae were obtained from the fungal collection established by the authors and tested in the present study. Their identification was confirmed based on cultural, morphological, and microscopic characteristics and molecular phylogenetic analysis. To control these isolates in Egypt, the research aims to determine the efficacy of some specific chemical fungicides, such as Moncut®, Tazolen®, and Divide®, as well as the efficacy of biocontrol agents, such as Bio Zeid®, Plant Guard®, and Bio Arc®, both in vitro and in vivo. All the tested fungicides and biocides significantly decreased the in vitro growth of F. culmorum and L. theobromae to different degrees. However, the highest colony growth inhibition was presented by fungicides Tazolen® and bioagent Bio Zeid®. Meanwhile, the results obtained under natural environmental conditions supported the in vitro results as the disease severity percentage was decreased, and reduction percentages were decreased due to using each of the tested treatments, but to varying degrees. It was evident that Bio Zeid® was superior to all the other treatments and increased all plant parameters compared to untreated control.
Globally, potatoes are among the most significant crops. A plant that belongs to the Solanaceae family is the potato. Approximately 5,000 different types of potatoes exist in the world (Moussa and Shama 2019). Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the world's most important non-grain food crops, crucial to human sustenance (Getu et al., 2023). Also, are among the most popular and widespread food crops all over the world including in Egypt (Hamed, 2020). Hamed, (2020) recorded that in recent years, Egypt's in importing cultivating potato tubers has substantially expanded. While the import coverage time for domestic consumption of potatoes increased from 9.6 days in 1995 to 17.9 days in 2018, the production adequacy period for domestic consumption of potatoes declined from 425 days in 1995 to 406.6 days in 2018. Because potato tubers contain more than 70% water, handling, transportation, and storage during harvest can cause galls, blemishes, and one of the most significant illnesses affecting potatoes is fusarium dry rot, which affects both the seed pieces after planting and the tubers while they are in storage. In temperate regions, Fusarium sambucinum and F. solani are frequent infections that cause dry rot in stored tubers (Aydın and İnal 2018). F. tricinctum, F. avenaceum, F. oxysporum, F.solani,F. acuminatum, F. equiseti F. solanim in Northwest of China, Qinghai Province, and F. moniliform, F. redolens in South of China Zhejiang Province (Wang et al., 2020). "Dry rot" or "stem-end rot" is a disease that potato tubers can contract due to the fungus Botryodiplodia theobromae. It is a widespread issue in potato crops across the globe that can result in large yield and quality losses. (Mello et al., 2020). Numerous fungus species, including Fusarium spp. and Botryodiplodia theobromae, have been linked to potato rotting. The tubers become infected with these fungus in the pre-harvest stage when they are still in the soil, as well as through openings and physical damage sustained by the tubers during harvesting. The full manifestation of the infection occurs during storage. (Salami and Popoola, 2007 and Ogunsola and Aduramigba-Modupe 2014) Infections of tubers can occur through wounds or natural openings like lenticels, as Fusarium culmorum and Botryodiplodia theobromae thrive in soil and plant debris. Growth, harvesting, and storage are all potential times for infection. Warm weather promotes the growth of disease (Aydin, 2019, Mello et al., 2020, and Huda‑Shakirah et al., 2022and Xue et al., 2023).Significant losses are seen as a result of a variety of circumstances during potato planting and storage. Given the losses they generate, storage diseases, which are brought on by fungal pathogens, play a significant role in potato production (Yikilmsoy and Tosun 2021).
Over the last few decades producers are becoming increasingly reliant on fungicides such as Moncut®, Tazolen® and Divide for disease control (Rosenzweig et al., 2008,Siddique et.al., 2016, and Mahmoud et al., 2018,). Fungicide application isn't always effective in addition to the environmental contamination that comes with using agrochemicals to control plant diseases (Gikas et al., 2022). Creating novel approaches to prevent fungal diseases is crucial to achieving efficient and long-term agricultural productivity (Garvey et al., 2022, and Ilyas et al., 2023).
An alluring substitute for the use of fungicides or the management of plant diseases without the drawbacks of chemical control is biological control, which includes the employment of microbes or their antibiotics. According to Baysal-Gure and Kabir (2018) and Lahlali et al. (2022), these bioagents competitively colonize plant sections, promote growth, and/or lessen the frequency of plant illness, like Bio Zeid®, Plant Guard® Bio Arc® (Mohamed and Taha, 2017, Mahmoud et al., 2018, Sarhan 2020and Al-Mansoury and Salih 2022).Biological control is a very helpful strategy for managing diseases, and it is very important for creating an environmentally friendly atmosphere. Biological control is crucial for controlling plant diseases without harming wildlife or flora, and it also improves soil fertility (Ghorbanpour et al., 2018). Biological control which relies on using microorganisms to suppress pathogens infecting potato tubers offers an alluring substitute. Numerous fungal biocontrol agents have been employed in the management of plant diseases, with the Trichoderma group showing promising results against tuber pathogens like F. sambucinum(Aydin 2019). Trichoderma spp. is one of the most commonly used antagonists in biological control, by the source of enzymes that break down cell walls pathogen, as a biocontrol agent boosting crop yield, encouraging plant growth, increasing nutrient availability, and strengthening disease resistance (Mejdoub-Trabelsi et al, 2020). Several commercial bioagents have been reported to control in laboratories, greenhouses, and fields such as Bio-Zeid® (Shaaban et al., 2022).
The goal of this paper is to determine the efficacy of certain chemical fungicides, and the efficacy of biocontrol agents (in vitro and in vivo)for controlling some imported seed potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) fungal diseases in Egypt.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All experiments were conducted in the laboratory and under natural environmental conditions in “Research Branch, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Ornamental, Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Diseases Research Department, El-Sabihia Agricultural Research Station Alexandria” from 2019 to 2022.
1.Morphological and molecular characterization of the tested isolates
Two pathogenic aggressive isolates associated with seed potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) fungi namely Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae were obtained from fungal collection established by the authors in the "ARC, Sabihia Agricultural Research Station Alexandria". These two isolates per previously isolated from recovered from imported potato tubers seeds showed dry rot symptoms of the surface of tuber's outside has Brown or black dark depressions, which may evolve and spread inward turn into wrinkle then the dead tissue beneath dries out. Additionally, the fungi may cause tubers to wilt and mummify. Their identification was conducted based on cultural, morphological, microscopic characteristics. Then, in the present study, for the molecular phylogenetic analysis in “Assiut University's Molecular Biology Research Unit”, cultures extracted DNA using a Patho-gene-spin DNA/RNA extraction kit that was donated by the Korean company Intron Biotechnology. After that, fungal DNA samples were sent to SolGent Company in Daejeon, South Korea, for 18S sequencing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The reaction mixture contained ITS1 (forward) and ITS4 (reverse) primers, which were used for PCR (Moore et al., 2011). Primers include ITS1 (5'-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G - 3') and ITS4 (5'-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC -3') that have been using universal primer pairs. The same primers were used to sequence the amplified PCR products (amplicons), but ddNTPs were added to the reaction mixture (White et al., 1990). By obtaining sequences of the amplified regions and utilizing "the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)", the isolate's identity was verified. The alignments were carried out using MegAlign (DNA Star) version 5.05 for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis. The fungal strain's ITS sequences were used to identify the phylogenetic tree which was then aligned with closely related sequences obtained from the GenBank.
2.In vitro effect of certain fungicide on Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae
Three fungicides were tested in the laboratory to study their effectiveness against two fungi isolates. Systemic and contact fungicides were used throughout this study as prepared diluted solutions. Names of fungicides (commercial and/or common, and chemical), manufacture source, chemical combinations structure, and application are listed in Table (1). The tests were conducted using three fungicides Moncut®, Tazolen®, and Divide® recommended doses (Table 1.) in vitro to evaluate their efficacy against the most pathogenic fungi of the seed potato tubers fungi (Siddique et.al., 2016, and Mahmoud et al., 2018,). Fungicides were tested for their antagonistic potential against F. culmorum and L. theobromae using a double culture assay with solid PDA plates according to Rosli et al. (2020). Every PDA plate was split in half, and each half was inoculated on one side with a mycelial disc (5-mm diameter) taken from the margins of the actively growing F. culmorum and L. theobromae of 7-day-old PDA cultures, keeping a distance of one cm from the plate's edge from opposite sides. Similarly, a 5-mm-diameter filter paper disc impregnated with individual each fungicide separately was placed on the opposite side of each plate, one centimeter from the plate edge (Rios-Velasco et al., 2016 and Abdel-Rahman et al., 2023). It used a negative control by comparing it to the untreated inoculated control. Five replicates of every treatment were created to assess each fungicide. All plates were incubated at 27±1 ºC until untreated control mycelia had just totally covered the plates. At that time, radial growth in plates for each treatment was measured according to Rosli et al. (2020) and Abdel-Rahman et al. (2023). This was done by computing the percentage of radial growth reduction in diameter mycelia of F. culmorum and L. theobromae.
Where:
U= Mean radial growth diameter of pathogen mycelia untreated (cm)
T= Mean radial growth diameter of the treated pathogen mycelia toward the bioagents and/or fungicides (cm)
Table 1. Fungicide, their commercial name, formulation, source, recommended doses, common name, chemical name and chemical structure
3. In vitro evaluation of the bioagents against Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae
Three biological control were tested in the laboratory to study their effectiveness against two fungal isolates. Biological control solution were preparated to concentrations with sterile distilled water at their recommended doses Table (2). The tests were using three biological i.e.,Bio Zeid® (Trichoderma album), Plant Guard® (Trichoderma harzianumin), and Bio Arc® (Bacillus megaterium)recommended doses (Table 2.) in vitro to evaluate their efficacy against the most pathogenic fungi of the seed potato tubers for their antagonistic potential against F. culmorum and L. theobromae using a double culture assay with solid PDA plates, and radial growth in plates for each treatment was measured as mentioned above (Rios-Velasco et al., 2016, Rosli et al., 2020, and Abdel-Rahman et al., 2023).
Table 2. Biocides, their commercial name, composition and concentration, and source
4.The in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of the fungicides and bioagents
Potato tubers seeds varieties Spunta cultivarswere obtained from, tuber seeds imported from several different countries To Egypt during the 2018/2019 season The tested tubers were of uniform size from ostensibly healthy tuber seed (Tuber sizes 28/55 mm).
Based on the results of laboratory experiments, the fungicide and biocidal that gives the highest efficiency rate among all treatments is selected and carried out to control aggressive pathogenic isolate of the tested fungal isolates. The tested pathogenic isolate was grown in pure cultures (PDA) at 27±2 ºC to prepare inocula. One 5-mm diameter mycelial disc was removed from the edges of the colony growth on plates after 7 days, and it was placed onto 75 and 25 g of pure sterilized sorghum sand medium, which were made from sorghum and finely washed sand, respectively, and 50 ml of tap water, in 200 ml glass bottles (Muhanna 2020) and incubated for 20 days at 27±2 ºC (Mohamed and Taha, 2017) 30 cm-diameter plastic pots were used after being sterilized with Clorox (5% sodium hypochlorite), inverted and given two days to dry. Sterilized soil (5 kg/pot) consisting of a 1:1 w:w mixture of sand and clay was placed into the sterilized pots. Before being used, the sand and clay were autoclaved for 30 minutes at 121°C, and they were then allowed to dry for two days (Abdel-Rahman, 2021).
All required horticultural precautions were taken before planting, and were placed under natural environmental conditions, and irrigated regularly throughout the entire trial (Moussa and Shama 2019). Then 2 days prior to planting, each soil in a 5-kg plastic pot was pre-infected with pathogenic isolate at a rate of 3% (w/w). Just before planting, potato seeds cv. Spunta cultivars were submerged in each treatment of fungicide and/ or Biocide for 20 minutes at their recommended doses, while control was sterile distilled water. Four weeks after the first sowing, treatments were administered once more using irrigation water. Three replications of each treatment were made, and each replicate consisted of 5 pots.
After 75 days of planting, some results were recorded related to the manifestations of vegetative growth, which include: The height of the plant (in centimeters) from ground level to the highest peak within the shoot, the number of main stems, number of branches, and number of leaflets for each plant. The percentage of infected plants (DI) was also recorded according to (Thongkantha et al., 2008, and Morang, et al., 2012), as follows:
According to Abd El-Zaher et al. (2005), and Raju and Naik (2007) Disease severity was estimated, with the following ratings: 0= no visual infection (the plants are fully healthy); 1= there are slight infection by a few scattered rotten spots covering less than 25% of the plants area; 2= there are moderately rotten spots covering up to 50% of the plants area; 3= there are heavily rotten spots covering up to 75% of the plants area; and, 4= there are rotten spots covering up to 100% of the plants area (the plants is completely decayed).
Where: Σnr = Total number of plants under scale degree X scale degree.
4N = Scale degrees (4) X total number of plants tested.
Furthermore, the percentage of reduction of disease by (percentage of disease severity) was calculated (El-Sersawy et al., 2022).
Also, percentage of treatment efficiency (TE %) by (percentage of infected plants "DI %") was determined as described by Farag et al. (2018), were computed utilizing the subsequent formula:
Statistical analysis
For every treatment, a randomized full block design was employed with three replications. Using the Statistix programme, the gathered data were statistically examined. and means comparisons, in accordance with Snedecor and Cochran (1989), were carried out at the 5% level using the least significant difference (LSD).
RESULTS
1.Morphological and molecular characterization of the recovered isolates of those associated with Potato tubers seeds (Solanum tuberosum L.)
The Two tested isolates of Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae were analysed at the molecular level for further identification. The tested strain showed 100% identity and 100% coverage with several strains of F. culmorum, AUMC 15122 and L. theobromae, AUMC 15123 accessed from the GenBank (Figure 3. & 4.). The fungus was putatively identified as F. culmorum (AUMC 15122) and L. theobromae (AUMC 15123) "GenBank accession No. OL454806, and MZ715017 respectively". Also, the phylogenetic tree identified showed that based on ITS sequences of rDNA of the fungal sample isolated in the present study (F. culmorum AUMC15122, arrowed) aligned with closely related strains accessed from the GenBank. This strain showed 100% identity and 99% -100% coverage with several strains of the same species, GenBank accession no. OL454806 (541 letters) “https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ OL454806” (Figure 3.) Also, the Phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequences of rDNA of the fungal strain isolated in the present study (L. theobromae AUMC15123) aligned with closely related sequences accessed from the GenBank. L. = Lasiodiplodia. The tested strain showed 100% identity and 100% coverage with several strains of L. theobromae accessed from the GenBank, GenBank accession no. MZ715017 (525 letters) “https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ MZ715017” (Figure 4.).
Figure 1. Cultural and morphological characteristics of the tested isolate associated with potato tubers seeds (Solanum tuberosum L.) of Fusarium culmorum (AUMC 15122), Colony on PDA after ten days, A. top surface, B. lower surface, and C. conidiophores and Conidia
Figure 2. Cultural and morphological characteristics of the tested isolate associated with potato tubers seeds (Solanum tuberosum L.) of Lasiodiplodia theobromae (AUMC 15123): Colony on PDA after ten days, A. top surface, B. lower surface, and C. Conidia
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequences of rDNA of the fungal isolate tested in the present study (Fusarium culmorum AUMC15122, arrowed) aligned with closely related strains accessed from the GenBank. This strain showed 100% identity and 99% -100% coverage with several strains of the same species, GenBank accession no. OL454806 (541 letters) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ OL454806)
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree based on ITS sequences of rDNA of the fungal isolate tested in the present study (Lasiodiplodiatheobromae AUMC15123) aligned with closely related sequences accessed from the GenBank. L. = Lasiodiplodia. The tested strain showed 100% identity and 100% coverage with several strains of L. theobromae accessed from the GenBank, GenBank accession no. MZ715017 (525 letters) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/ MZ715017)
2.In vitro effect of certain fungicide on Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae
In vitro effect of fungicides Moncut® (2g/l), Tazolen® (2.5g/l), and Divide® (2g /l) on colony growth of F. culmorum and L. theobromae is shown in Table (3). The tested fungicides obviously suppressed the colony diameter of F. culmorum and L. theobromaethe tested to different degrees (Fig. 5). Tazolen® fungicide followed by Moncut® (2g/l) proved to be the most effective. Their means of inhibition of colony diameter were (56.00 & 48.00 %), and (35.55 & 28.44 %) for F. culmorum and L. theobromae respectively (Table 3).
Figure 5. Direct evaluation fungicide Moncut® (2g/l), Tazolen® (2.5g/l), and Divide® (2g/l) antagonistic potential against Fusarium culmorum AUMC15122 and Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 in vitro using double culture plate assay, Cultures were incubated at 26 ± 2°C for,7 days in darkness.
Table (3): The in vitro antifungal inhibition of fungicide Moncut® (2g/l), Tazolen® (2.5g/l), and Divide® (2g/l) to control Fusarium culmorum AUMC15122 and Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 on PDA medium, incubated at 26 ± 2°C for, 7 days in darkness.
Treatment
(Concentrations)
Fungi Inhibition %
Mean
F.culmorum
L.theobromae
Moncut® WP 2g/l
48.00 B
28.44 D
38.22 A
Tazolen® WP 2.5g/l
56.00 A
35.55 C
45.78 A
Divide® WP 2g/l
29.78 CD
06.44 E
18.11 B
Untreated inoculated control
00.00 E
00.00 E
00.00 C
LSD.at 5%
6.6799
10.393
*The values represent the average of five PDA plates per treatment, for each single column, values followed by different letter(s) are significantly different at p=0.05
3.In vitro evaluation of the bioagents against Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae
In vitro three bioagents biological i.e., Bio Zeid® (Trichoderma album), Plant Guard® (T. harzianumin), andBio Arc®(Bacillus megaterium) were evaluated for their antagonistic potential against F. culmorum and L. theobromae recovered from potato tubers seeds. It is evident in (Figure 6.) that all the biological agents tested (Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l) Plant Guard® (4ml/l) Bio Arc® (2.5g/l) have the ability to suppress the growth of F. culmorum and L. theobromae to different degrees. However, data in (Table 4.) showed that the highest F. culmorum and L. theobromae colony growth inhibition was presented by bioagent Bio Zeid® Trichoderma album, 25×106 cfu/ml (62.67 and 51.78 %, respectively). However, the least growth inhibition was recorded by Bio Arc®Bacillus megaterium, 30×106 Cells /g with (34.22 and 28.22 %) of inhibition of F. culmorum and L. theobromae, respectively(Table 4.).
4.The in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of the fungicides and bioagentsagainst Lasiodiplodia theobromae
This trial was under-placed under natural environmental conditions in plastic pots. the fungicide Moncut® WP (2g/l), and Tazolen® WP (2.5g/l), also, biocidal Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l), and Bio Arc® (2.5g/l), which gave the highest efficiency rate among all treatments in vitro selected and carried out to control Lasiodiplodia theobromae aggressive pathogenic isolate of the most pathogenic fungi of the Potato tubers seeds (S. tuberosum L.). Table 5. displays the data obtained, which indicates that all tested treatments achieved a significant reduction in both disease severity percentages, albeit to differing degrees when compared to untreated plants. Treatment with fungicides Tazolen® WP (2.5g/l) and biocides Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l) resulted in the highest activity against Lasiodiplodia theobromae tested fungus, compared to untreated control. On the other hand, data in (Table 5.) showed that under the effect of Tazolen® and Bio Zeid®, the mean of disease infection, (20.00 and 46.67%, respectively) and severity percentages were (16.67 and 33.33, respectively). However, the least significant impact was due to treatment by Bio Arc® (2.5g/l) at (73.33, and 71.53% respectively)of the mean of disease infection, and severity percentages.
Figure 6. Direct evaluation biological (Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l) Plant Guard® (4ml/l) Bio Arc® (2.5g/l)antagonistic potential against Fusarium culmorum AUMC15122, and Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 in vitro using double culture plate assays, Cultures were kept under incubation at 26 ± 2°C for 7 days.
Table (4): The in vitro antifungal inhibition of biological by Bio Zeid® Plant Guard®, and Bio Arc® to control Fusarium culmorum AUMC15122 and Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 of potato tubers seeds on PDA medium, incubated in the dark at 27±1 ºC for 7 days
Treatment
(Concentrations)
Fungi Inhibition %
Mean
Fusariumculmorum
Lasiodiplodiatheobromae
Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l)
*62.67A
51.78 B
57.22 A
Plant Guard® (4ml/l)
53.78 B
40.00 C
46.89 B
Bio Arc® (2.5g/l)
34.22 D
28.22 E
31.22 C
Untreated inoculated control
00.00 F
00.00 F
00.00 D
LSD.at 5%
3.8675
5.1241
*The values represent the average of five modified PDA plates per treatment, For each single column, values followed by different letter(s) are significantly different at p=0.05
Table 5. In vivo effect of the tested bioagents and certain fungicides and biocides on percentage of disease incidence, and severity caused by artificial infection with Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 on potato tubers (S. tuberosum L.). cv. Spunta, 77 days after treatment under natural environmental conditions
Treatment, (Concentrations)
Disease infection (%)
Disease severity %
Moncut® WP (2g/l)
*53.33 BC
47.22 C
Tazolen® WP (2.5g/l)
20.00 D
16.67 D
Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l)
46.67 C
33.33 CD
Bio Arc® (2.5g/l)
73.33 B
71.53 B
Untreated inoculated control
100 A
100 A
LSD.at 5%
26.180
22.962
* The values represent the average of 15 potato tubers/treatment, For each single parameter, values followed by different letter(s) are significantly different at p=0.05
The data presented in Figure 7. shows that, all tested treatments resulted in a significant reduction in disease percentages, to differing degrees. Meanwhile, under the effect of Tazolen® followed by Bio Zeid®, the mean of reduction percentage was (83.33 and 66.67%, respectively). However, the least significant impact was due to treatment by Bio Arc® (2.5g/l) at 28.47% of the mean reduction percentages.
Figure 7.In vivo effect of the tested bioagents and certain fungicides and biocides on percentage of reduction of disease severity caused by artificial infection with Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 on seeds potato tubers (S. tuberosum L.) cv. Spunta, 77 days after inoculation and treatment under were placed under natural environmental conditions
On the other hand, Fig. 8 showed insignificant differences between treatments Moncut® WP (2g/l), and Bio Arc® (2.5g/l). However, there are significant differences between Tazolen® and Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l)compared to untreated control. Tazolen® WP (2.5g/l) gave the highest effectiveness (80%) followed by Bio Zeid® (53.33%), while Bio Arc® (2.5g/l) was the least effective (26.67%).
Figure 8.Efficiency percentages of certain fungicides and biocides (applied to seeds potato tubers, and soil) against Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 placed under natural environmental conditions
5.Effect on potato growth characteristics
According to data in Table (6.), all the tested fungicides Tazolen® WP (2.5g/l), Moncut® WP (2g/l), and biocides Bio Zeid®, Bio Arc® (2.5g/l) significantly increased all parameters of plants, i.e., Plant height (cm) No. of main stems, No. of branches, and No. of leaflets, compared to untreated control. It was evident that Bio Zeid® was superior to all the other treatments and increased all plant parameters. Compared to untreated control, the highest values of parameters of plants, i.e., Plant height (247, 048 cm) No. of main stems (17, 03), No. of branches (69, 08) and No. of leaflets (119, 020) with Bio Zeid® then untreated control respectively. However, it showed the least effects and insignificant differences between treatments Moncut® WP (2g/l), and Bio Arc® (2.5g/l). Showed the recorded least each all with Plant height (160, 138 cm) No. of main stems (9, 8), No. of branches (30, 27) and No. of leaflets (101, 119), respectively.
Table 6.In vivo effect of the tested bioagents, fungicides and biocides on mean percentage of vegetative growth caused by artificial infection with Lasiodiplodia theobromae AUMC15123 on seeds potato tubers (S. tuberosum L.), cv. Spunta, 77 days after treatment under natural environmental conditions
Treatment, (Concentrations)
Plant height (cm)
No. of main stems
No.of branches
No. of leaflets
Moncut® WP (2g/l)
*160 C
09 C
30 C
101C
Tazolen® WP (2.5g/l)
202 B
12 B
49 B
140 B
Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l)
247 A
17 A
69 A
231 A
Bio Arc® (2.5g/l)
138 C
08 C
27 C
119 BC
Untreated inoculated control
048 D
03 D
08 D
020 D
LSD.at 5%
27.395
3.5724
13.651
26.162
* The values represent the average of 15 plants/treatment, The values represent the average of 15 plants/treatment, For each single parameter, values followed by different letter(s) are significantly different at p=0.05
DISCUSSION
The research aims to at evaluating the efficacy of certain chemical fungicides i.e., Moncut®, Tazolen®, and Divide® and biocontrol agents viz, Bio Zeid® (Trichoderma album), Plant Guard® (Trichoderma harzianumin), and Bio Arc® (Bacillus megaterium) in vitro and in vivo, for controlling two of the most pathogenic aggressive isolates of those associated with imported potato tubers seeds (Siddique et.al., 2016, and Mahmoud et al., 2018, Aydin 2019, Gikas et al., 2022, and Shaaban et al., 2022) of fungi namely Fusarium culmorum and Lasiodiplodia theobromae obtained from fungal collection established by the authors in the “ARC, Sabihia Agricultural Research Station Alexandria”.
Potatoes (S. tuberosum L.) are considered one of the most important popular crops to the Egyptian people. Pathogen-caused storage diseases are an important and economic serious problem causing severe losses are potato production in Egypt, numerous conditions during the importation, cultivation and storage of potatoes can lead to significant losses. (Yikilmsoy and Tosun 2021). Results in the present study showed that it has been determined, to identify and confirm F. culmorum and L. theobromae isolates based on morphological and microscopic characteristics and Molecular characterization which were matched to strains that were obtained from GenBank and closely related. Several investigators have been reported that F. culmorum and L. theobromae are a soil-borne phytopathogen fungus and attack seed potato tubers during storage and wide spread in the world including Egypt (Hammam, and El Damrawy, 2022, and Xue et al., 2023). Soil-borne storage infections, the most dangerous of which are Fusarium species, including F. culmorum are a problem for post-harvest potato storage. If more than one Fusarium species are involved, the damage is always greater (Tiwari et al, 2021). Dry patches are formed as a result of spoiling, and while subsequent symptoms might not be seen during a visual inspection, they are far more dangerous. Among these are the rise in sucrose and total soluble sugars and the decrease in the amount of starch and amylose. (Tiwari et al, 2021, and Xue et al., 2023). Also, the fungus Botryodiplodia theobromae (Lasiodiplodia theobromae) is responsible for the "dry rot" or "stem-end rot" that affects potato tubers. It can result in considerable losses in yield and quality and is a widespread issue with potato crop around the world (Mello et al., 2020). When potato tubers are infected with B. theobromae, they can develop brown or black sunken lesions on their surface. These lesions can begin at the tuber's stem end and progress inside. Additionally, the fungus can cause the tubers to shrivel and mummify (Mello et al., 2020, and Huda‑Shakirah et al., 2022). These results are in agreement with some other reports about the effects of different both F. culmorum and Botryodiplodia theobromae can infect tubers through wounds or naturally occurring openings like lenticels. They can also survive in soil and plant debris. During cultivation, harvesting, or storage, infections can happen. Warm, humid weather encourages the growth of disease (Aydin, 2019, Mello et al., 2020, and Huda‑Shakirah et al., 2022and Xue et al., 2023).
For controlling F. culmorum and B. theobromae, six common fungicides and bio were investigated in vitro and in vivo. All the tested fungicides and bio significantly decreased the in vitro growth of F. culmorum and L. theobromae to different degrees. However, the highest colony growth inhibition was presented by fungicides Tazolen® (2.5g/l) bioagent Bio Zeid® (Trichoderma album, 25×106 cfu/ml). Meanwhile, the results obtained under natural environmental conditions supported the in vitro results as disease severity percentages were decreased, and reduction percentages were decreased due to using each of the tested treatments, but to varying degrees, compared with untreated plants. Also, the highest effect was presented by fungicides Tazolen® (2.5g/l) bioagent Bio Zeid® (Trichoderma album, 25×106 cfu/ml). Such results are in harmony with those obtained by several foreign authors (Siddique et al., 2016, Mahmoud et al., 2018, Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2018 and Halifu et al., 2019). Tazolen consisting of Mancozeb functions as a multi-site inhibitor, interfering with several enzymes and fungal metabolic processes (Siddique et al., 2016). Metalaxyl functions by obstructing the growth of fungi and preventing the formation of fungal cell walls (Mahmoud et al., 2018). Mancozeb and Metalaxyl both provide potent curative effects against a variety of fungal diseases in seed potato tubers, guarding against a broad spectrum of pathogens. (Siddique et al., 2016, and Mahmoud et al., 2018).
Mancozeb is a contact and protective non-systemic fungicide. Mancozeb affects fungi at several different sites, interfering with their lipid metabolism. It is effective against a variety of pathogens, such as rusts, blights, scabs, and leaf spots on crops like potatoes, because of its multi-site activity. It functions to control fungal infections that are already present on the seed potato tubers because of its curative mode of action. (Huang et al., 2021). Conversely, metalaxyl functions as both a preventative and a therapeutic systemic fungicide. It works very well against Oomycete fungi, which include the pathogens that cause potato tuber root and collar rot and seedling damping-off. With its ascending system, high lipophilicity, and rapid penetration, Metalaxyl can easily cross waxy membranes, move up the xylem, enter the plant in less than an hour, and remain active for two weeks inside the plant. Because Metalaxyl is absorbed by the leaves, stems, and roots due to its translaminar properties, it is a good option for managing fungal diseases such as mildew. Its fungicide features (Kankwatsa et al., 2003).
Trichoderma spp. is a type of fungus that provides protection for plant roots by forming a barrier against pathogen attack by removing the used by pathogen nutrients. Meanwhile, secretion of chitinases dissolves the cell wall and creates holes in the pathogen, causing cell wall damage and lysis through the production of chitinase and extracellular-(1-4) glucanase, causing pathogen cell wall damage and lysis. (Oraghi et al., 2011, Leelavathi et al., 2014, Guzmán-Guzmán et al., 2018, and Halifu et al., 2019). The fact that plant bioprotection is accomplished by the synthesis of plant growth regulators, such as gibberellic acid, indole-3-acetic acid, and abscisic acid, by bioagents, explains the tested bioagents' activities. The production of phytohormones has been directly linked to the availability of bioagents, which increase plant growth and lowers disease parameters. (Mohamed and Taha, 2017, and Mahmoud et al., 2018).Trichoderma album worked by competing with fungi for nutrients and available space, exhibiting mycoparasitism towards the pathogen, and possibly secreting antibiosis. The pathogen's growth was impeded by the antagonist's quick development and competition for nutrients and available space. Due to their high rate of reproduction, effective nutrition uptake, strong aggressiveness against other pathogens, and quick and efficient colonization of wound sites against invasive pathogens, Trichoderma species have been used successfully as biological control agents (Sarhan 2020 and Al-Mansoury and Salih 2022).
CONCLUSIONS
Potatoes are an important crop worldwide, including in Egypt, and play a significant role in human nutrition. However, potato tubers are susceptible to various fungal diseases, especially during handling, transportation, and storage. We recommend dipping seed potato tubers for 20 minutes. Then four weeks after sowing, treatments were administered once more with irrigation water in the soil by one of the treatments i.e., Tazolen® WP (2.5g/l), and Bio Zeid® (2.5g/l).
الملخص العربى
المكافحة الكيميائية والبيولوجية للفطريات المسببة للأمراض المصاحبة لدرنات البطاطس المستوردة
عمر أحمد عمر متولى1 تغريد فكري محمد عبد الرحمن2 سعد محمود شمة3 مصطفى عبد العظيم3
1الحجر الزراعى المصرى 2قسم بحوث أمراض نباتات الزينة والطبية والعطرية – معهد بحوث امراض النباتات - مركز البحوث الزراعية – جيزه – مصر 3قسم النبات الزراعى -كلية زراعة ساباباشا – جامعة الاسكندرية
تعد البطاطس محصولًا أساسيًا في مصر وفي جميع أنحاء العالم، حيث تساهم بشكل كبير في تغذية الإنسان. ومع ذلك، أثناء النقل والتخزين، تتعرض درنات البطاطس بشكل خاص لمجموعة متنوعة من المسببات المرضية. تم الحصول على اثنتين من أكثر العزلات العدوانية المسببة للأمراض من تلك المرتبطة بدرنات البطاطس (Solanum tuberosum L.) وهي Fusarium culmorum و Lasiodiplodiatheobromae من المجموعة الفطرية المعزوله. تم تأكيد هويتهم بناءً على الخصائص المورفولوجية والمجهرية والتحليل الجزيئي. يهدف البحث إلى تحديد كفاءة بعض المبيدات الفطرية الكيميائية مثل مون كت، تازولين، ديفايد، وكذلك كفاءة عوامل المكافحة الحيوية مثل بيو زيد، بلانت جارد، وبيو آرك، وتم دراستهم في المختبر وفي الظروف الطبيعية. جميع المبيدات الفطرية والحيوية التي تم اختبارها أدت إلى انخفاض معنوى بتثبيط نمو F. culmorum و L. theobromae بدرجات معنوية متفاوتة. ومع ذلك، فإن أعلى تثبيط معنوى للمستعمرة الفطرية بواسطة المبيد الفطرى التازولين والمبيد الحيوي البيو زيد وفى الوقت نفسة أكدت التجربة في ظل الظروف البيئية الطبيعية هذة النتائج باتجاه مشابة للأختبارات المعملية بتاثيرات متفاوتة للنسبة المئوية لكفاءة جميع المعاملات فى مكافحة المرض، وقد ترافق مع ذلك تسجيل البيو زيد ا أعلى قيم معنوية فى معاملات نمو النبات من أرتفاع النبات، عدد السيقان الرئيسية، عدد الفروع وعدد الوريقات مقارنة بالكنترول غير المعامل.
References
Abd El-Zaher, E.A.; Hilal, A.A.; Ibrahim, I.A.M.; and Naglaa, T.M. 2005. Leaf spots of ornamental foliage Plants in Egypt with special reference to Corynespora cassiicola [(Berk. & Curt.) Wei] as a new causal. Egypt. J. Phytopathol, 33 (1): 87-103.
Abdel-Rahman, T.F.M. 2021. Evaluation of the efficiency of some bio-Fertilizers and different silicon sources for controlling bulb rot of Lilium spp. in Egypt. J. Adv. Agric. Res., (JAAR), 26 (4): 454-465. DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2022.115736.1041
Abdel-Rahman, T.F.M.; Abdel‑Megeed, A.; and Salem, M.Z.M. 2023. Characterization and control of Rhizoctonia solani affecting lucky bamboo (Dracaena sanderiana hort. ex. Mast.) using some bioagents. Scientific Reports,13:6691, 1-18, DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-33628-8
Al-Mansoury, B.A.R.; and Salih. Y.A. 2022. Evaluation of the efficiency of bio agents Trichoderma harzianum and T. longibrachiatum and some fungicides and a chemical compound against the fungus Rhizoctonia sp. that causes eggplant root rot disease in vitro. Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science.13 (3): 210-231
Aydin, M.H.; and İnal, B. 2018. Comparative susceptibility of some commercial potato cultivars to Fusarium sambucinum and F. solani isolates causing tuber dry rot. Appli. Ecol. Environ. Res., 16(4): 4879-4892.
Aydin, M.H. 2019. Evaluation of some Trichoderma species in biological control of potato dry rot caused by Fusarium sambucinum fuckel isolates. Appli. Ecol. Environ. Res., 17(1): 533-546.
Baysal-Gure, F.; and Kabir. N. 2018. Comparative performance of fungicides and biocontrol products in suppression of Rhizoctonia Root Rot in viburnum. Journal of Plant Pathol Microbiol 9 (9): 451-456. doi: 10.4172/2157-7471.100045
El-Sersawy, M.M.; Atta, H.M.; Abd El-Gawad, A.M.; El-Ghamry, A.A.; and Hassan, S.E. 2022. Potential of some plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial strains as biocontrol agents against fusarium wilt disease in cucumber. Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 37(1-2):1-30.
Farag, M.F.; Ghebrial, E.W.R.; and Zawam, H.S. 2018. Efficacy of some medicinal and aromatic plants combined with different biocides against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici-Meloidogyne incognita disease complex in tomato. Egypt. J. Phytopathol., 46 (2): 85-106
Garvey, M.; Meade, E.; and Rowan, N. J. 2022. Effectiveness of front line and emerging fungal disease prevention and control interventions and opportunities to address appropriate eco-sustainable solutions. Science of The Total Environment, 851, (2): 10, 158284. Doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158284
Getu, T.; Mohammed, W.; Seid, A.; Mekete, T.; Kassa, B.; and Bogale, M.; 2023. Prevalence, occurrence and characterisation of disease complex involving Ralstonia solanacearum and Meloidogyne spp. on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in eastern Ethiopia. Russian Journal of Nematology, 31 (1), 17 – 28.
Ghorbanpour, M.; Omidvari, M.; Abbaszadeh-Dahaji, P.; Omidvar,; R.; and Kariman K. 2018. Mechanisms underlying the protective effects of beneficial fungi against plant diseases. Biol. Cont., 117:147–157.
Gikas, G.D.; Parlakidis, P.; Mavropoulos, T.; Vryzas, Z. 2022. Particularities of Fungicides and Factors Affecting Their Fate and Removal Efficacy: A Review. Sustainability, 14(7): 4056.doi.org/10.3390/su14074056
Guzmán-Guzmán, P.; Porras-Troncoso, M.D.; Olmedo-Monfil, V.; and Herrera-Estrella, A. 2018. Trichoderma Species: Versatile Plant Symbionts. The American Phytopathological Society. (109) 1: 6-16.
Halifu, S.; Deng, X.; Song X.; and Song, 2019. R. Effects of two trichoderma strains on plant growth, rhizosphere soil nutrients, and fungal Ccommunity of pinus sylvestris var. mongolica Aannual seedlings. Forests 10, 758. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f10090758
Hamed, E.T. 2020. An economic study of the impact of losses on potato production and consumption in Egypt. Egypt. J. Agric. Res., 98 (2), 201-213. DOI: 10.21608/EJAR.2020.118054
Huang, Z.; Wang, P.; Pu, Z.; Lu, L.; Chen, G.; Hu, X.; Fayyaz, A.; and Gai, Y. 2021. Effects of mancozeb on citrus rhizosphere bacterial community. Microbial Pathogenesis, (154): 104845https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104845.
Huda‑Shakirah, A.; Nor, N.M.I.M.; Zakaria, L.; Leong, Y.H.; and Mohd, M.H. 2022.Lasiodiplodia theobromae as a causal pathogen of leaf blight, stem canker, and pod rot of Theobroma cacao in Malaysia. Scientifc Reports, (12):8966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13057-9
Ilyas, T.; Malviya, D.; Shafi, Z.; Shahid, M.; Vishwakarma, S.K.; Yadav, B.; Singh, U.B.; Rai, J.P.; Singh, H.B.; and Singh, H.V. 2023. Biochar-Mediated suppression of soil-borne pathogens in agronomically important crops: an outlook. Springer, Singapore, 8(15): 383-400. Doi:10.1007/978-981-19-8307-8_15
Kankwatsa, P.; Hakiza, J.J.; Olanya, M; Kidenamariam, H.M.; and Adipala, E. 2003. Efficacy of different fungicide spray schedules for control of potato late blight in Southwestern Uganda. Crop Protection, 22, (3):545-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00220-X
Lahlali, R.; Ezrari, S.; Radouane, N.; Kenfaoui, J.; Esmaeel, Q.; El Hamss, H.; Belabess, Z.; and Barka. E.A. 2022. Biological control of plant pathogens: a Global perspective. Microorganisms. 10, (596):1-33. doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030596
Leelavathi, M. S.; Vani, L.; and Reena, P. 2014. Antimicrobial activity of Trichoderma harzianum against bacteria and fungi. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 3(1):96-103.
Mahmoud, N.A.; Khalifa, N.A.; Abbas, M.S.; Sobhy, H.M.; and Abou-Zeid, N.M.2018. Efficacy of antagonistic fungal and bacterial bioagents against Faba bena damping-off disease. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 45, (3): 917-929.
Mejdoub-Trabelsi, B.; Touihri, S.; Ammar, N.; Riahi, A.; Daami-Remadi, M. 2020. Effect of chitosan for the control of potato diseases caused by Fusarium species. J. Phytopathol., 168: 18–27.
Mello, J.F.DE.; Brito, A.C.Q.; Vieira, J.C.B.; Câmara, M.P.S.; Michereff, S.J.; Souza-Motta, C.M.DE.; and Machado, A.R. 2020. Identification and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with root and stem rot of sweet potato in Brazil. Plant Pathology,(70):1601–1615. DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13395
Mohamed, G.S.; and Taha, E. 2017. Potency of entomopathogenic fungi, Trichoderma album preuss in controlling, Rhzopertha dominica F. (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) under laboratory conditions.J. Plant Prot. and Path., Mansoura Univ., 8 (11): 571 – 576.
Moore, D.; Robson, G.D.; and Trirci. A.P.J. 2011. 21ST Century guidebook to fungi. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 640
Morang, P.; Dutta, B.K.; Kumar, B.S.D.; Kashyap, M.P. 2012. Growth Promotion and Bi-Control Approaches of Brown Root Rot Disease of Tea by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (PM 105). J Plant Pathol Microb 3:129. doi:10.4172/2157-7471.1000129
Moussa, S.A,M.; and Shama, M.A. 2019. Mitigation the adverse effects of irrigation water salinity on potato crop using potassium silicate foliar application. Middle East J. Appl. Sci., 9(3): 804-819.
Muhanna, N.A.S. 2020. Distinguished Positive Reactions of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid Host Plants, Laboratory Media, and Potting soil. Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology, (48) 107-121.
Ogunsola, J.F.; and Aduramigba-Modupe, A.O. 2014. Evaluation of four plant extracts in the control of postharvest fungi tuber rot of Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum). A Research Article in AJRTC, 11 (1): 1-9.
Oraghi, A.; Oraghi, N.A.; Mohammad, S.; and Hamdi, M. 2011. Physiological effects of Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants and its possible impact on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici. Australasian Journal of Crop Science 5(12):1631-1638
Raju, K.; and Naik, M.K. 2007. Survey and assessment for the postharvest diseases of onion in North-Eastern Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 20 (1): 164-165.
Rios-Velasco, C.; Caro-Cisneros, J.M.; Berlanga-Reyes, D.I.; Ruiz-Cisneros, M.F.; Ornelas-Paz, J.J.; Salas-Marina, M.Á.; Villalobos-Pérez, E.Y.; and Guerrero-Prieto. V.M. 2016. Identification and antagonistic activity in vitro of Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma spp. isolates against common phytopathogenic fungi. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 34: 84-99. doi: 10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1507-1
Rosenzweig, N., Atallah, Z.K.; Olaya,G.; and Stevenson, W.R.2008. Evaluation of QoI fungicide application strategies for managing fungicide resistance and potato early blight epidemics in Wisconsin. Plant Disease, 92 (4): 561-568. doi:10.1094/ PDIS-92-4-0561
Rosli, N.M.; Ashari, K.I.A.H.; and Azmi, N.S.A. 2020. Isolation and preliminary screening of endophytic fungi from Ficus carica for biocontrol and phosphate solubilization. Environment and Ecosystem Science (EES) 4(2): 77-84. doi: doi.org/10.26480/ees.02.2020.77.84
Salami, A.O.; and Popoola, O.O. 2007. Thermal control of some post-haevest rot pathgens of Irish potato Thermal control of some post-haevest rot pathgens of Irish potato. (Solanum tuberosum L.)Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 52 (1): 17- 31.
Sarhan, E.A.D. 2020. Effectiveness of certain biocides and essential oils in controlling damping-off and root-rot diseases of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, Mansoura Univ., 11(2): 79-87. DO I: 10.21608/jppp.2020.78906
Shaaban, N.M.; El-Shazly, A.M.; and Alnaggar, A. M. 2022. Biological control of white mould disease on dry bean caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Egypt. 1(7): 6, 137-154. DOI: 10.21608/MJAPAM.2022.273462
Siddique, N.A.; Aktar, M.S.; and Swapon, N.H. 2016. Comparative efficacy of different fungicides against late blight diseases of potato incited by phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de bary and its management. Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology. 7 (7):1000364. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7471.1000364
Snedecor, G.W.; and Cochran. W. 1989. Statistical Methods, Eighth Edition, Iowa State
University Press, USA. 491 pp.
Thongkantha, S.; Lumyong, S.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; and Hyde, K.D. 2008. Fungal saprobes and pathogens occurring on tissues of Dracaenalourieri and Pandanus spp. in Thailand Fungal Diversity, 30: 149-169.
Tiwari, R.K.; Bashyal, B.M.; Shanmugam, V.; Lal, M. K.; Kumar, R.; Sharma, S.; Gaikwad, V. K.; Singh, B.; and Aggarwal, R. 2021. Impact of Fusarium dry rot on physicochemical attributes of potato tubers during postharvest storage. Posth. Biol. Technol., 181: 111638.
Wang, W.Z.; Min, F.X.; Yang, S.; Wei, Q.; Guo, M.; Gao, Y.F.; Hu, L.S.; and Sheng, W.M. 2020. Research progress on potato dry rot disease in China and its control measures. China Veg., 4, 22–29.
White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; and Taylor. J.1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A guide to Methodsand Applications(ed. M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky & T. J. White), pp. 315-322. Academic Press: San Diego, U.S.A.
Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Kaur, L.; Singh. J.; and Zeng, F. 2023. Functional Food Based on Potato. 12, 2145. doi.org/10.3390/foods12112145
Xue, H.; Liu, Q.; Yang, Z. 2023. Pathogenicity, mycotoxin production, and control of potato dry rot caused by Fusarium spp.: A Review. J. Fungi, 9, 843. doi.org/ 10.3390/jof9080843
Yikilmsoy, G.; and Tosun, N.; 2021. Characterization of Fusarium sambucinum isolates associated with potato dry rot andevaluation of cultivar susceptibility and fungicides. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 45: 222-233. doi:10.3906/tar-2006-100