• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 30 (2025)
Volume Volume 29 (2024)
Volume Volume 28 (2023)
Volume Volume 27 (2022)
Volume Volume 26 (2021)
Volume Volume 25 (2020)
Issue Issue 4
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 24 (2019)
Volume Volume 23 (2018)
Volume Volume 22 (2017)
Volume Volume 21 (2016)
Volume Volume 20 (2015)
Volume Volume 19 (2014)
El-Mahrouk, M., Abido, A., Radwan, F., Gad, A. (2020). Response of Foeniculum Vulgare Plant to NPK Doses and Some Biostumulants. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 25(3), 255-267. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2020.161594
Mohamed E. El-Mahrouk; Aly I. Abido; Fathy I. Radwan; Asmaa E.M. Gad. "Response of Foeniculum Vulgare Plant to NPK Doses and Some Biostumulants". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 25, 3, 2020, 255-267. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2020.161594
El-Mahrouk, M., Abido, A., Radwan, F., Gad, A. (2020). 'Response of Foeniculum Vulgare Plant to NPK Doses and Some Biostumulants', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 25(3), pp. 255-267. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2020.161594
El-Mahrouk, M., Abido, A., Radwan, F., Gad, A. Response of Foeniculum Vulgare Plant to NPK Doses and Some Biostumulants. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2020; 25(3): 255-267. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2020.161594

Response of Foeniculum Vulgare Plant to NPK Doses and Some Biostumulants

Article 2, Volume 25, Issue 3 - Serial Number 96, September 2020, Page 255-267  XML PDF (787.97 K)
Document Type: Research papers
DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2020.161594
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Mohamed E. El-Mahrouk1; Aly I. Abido* 2; Fathy I. Radwan2; Asmaa E.M. Gad2
1Hort. Dept., Fac. Agric., Kafrelsheikh Univ
2Plant Production Dept. , Fac. Agric. (Saba Basha), Alex. Univ
Abstract
Foeniculum Vulgare Mill (family Apiaceae) is a strong aromatic and medicinal plant. It used for various proposes i.e., in food, cosmetic and medicinal industries. Therefore,field experiment was conducted during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons in private Farm at Maghnin village, Koum Hamada city, Elbehera Governorate, Egypt, to study the response of fennel plant to NPK doses and some biostumulants. The experiment was setup as a split plot design, whereas NPK doses ( 25, 50, 75, 100% from suggested dose which was 150, 150 and 50 kg/fed of ammonium sulphate, calcium superphosphate and potassium sulphate, respectively) were as main plots, and biostumulants treatments (ascorbic, salicylic and tryptophan acids )were arranged as sub plots. The obtained results indicated that 100% NPK dose gave significant increases in vegetative growth and flowering traits weight of 100 fruits, essential oil %,  yield/pant and chemical composition parameters under study (N,P,K and carbohydrate % ) while 75% NPK dose achieved a significant higher fruit yield/plant. Application of 100 mg/l of each ascorbic, salicylic and tryptophan acids together was the most effective treatment in increasing the values of vegetative growth and flowering traits, yield of seeds, essential oil production and chemical composition parameters in comparison to the other treatments of such acids. While the interaction treatment of 100% NPK dose combined with 100 mg/l of each used acids together recorded higher significant values of such parameters mentioned before in two seasons.
Keywords
Foeniculum Vulgare; NPK fertilizers; ascorbic acids salicylic acid and tryptophan
Main Subjects
Horticulture
Full Text

Introduction

Fennel (Foeniculum Vulgare Mil , Fam. Apiaceae ) is a strong aromatic and medicinal plant native to North Africa, Mediterranean region, southern Europe and Asia. In Egypt, fennel fruits are considered an important export spice, the country cultivates about 11000 feddans of fennel, mostly in Assiut and Qena Governorates, as a winter annual herb. The constituents of fennel volatile oil are anethole, limonene, fenchone, estragole, safrole, α-pinene, camphene, β-pinene, β-myrcene and p-cymene (Saravanaperumal and Terza, 2012).The fruits of the plant are used for folk medicine for its antispasmodic and stomachic, sedative, balsamic, cardiotonic, digestive, lactogogue and tonic properties.The essential oil is used for cosmetics and pharmaceutical products and it has a valuable antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer and antifungal activity (Bahmani et al., 2012). Fertilizer management is an important factor for a successful growth of officinal plants and the identity of suitable fertilizers in plants could have the desirable effects on quantitative and qualitative indices (Arab et al., 2015).  Mineral fertilizers (e.g. N, P, K…etc.) have a number of different negative influences on both the environment and health of humans due to accumulation of nitrate in growing plants, ground water and soil. Overusing chemical fertilizers has changed the biological ecosystem, affecting non-target organisms and adversely influencing microorganisms in the soil. To mitigate the risk of the bad effects of mineral fertilizers, it is necessary to replace chemical fertilizers by organic or biological fertilizers which are able to provide plant nutrients and also increase the sustainability of agro-ecosystems in the long term (Moradi et al., 2011). Plant bio-stimulants (e.g. salicylic acid, tryptophan and ascorbic acid) are effective when applied in small doses, thus leads to the plant growth and production enhancement (Li and Ni, 1996). Plant bio-stimulants are organic materials that appear to impact several metabolic procedures such as respiration, photosynthesis, nucleic acid synthesis and ion uptake and when applied in small quantities, improve the plant growth and development (Castro and Vieira, 2001). Therefore, this work was conducted to increasing the growth, essential oil% and yield productivity of fennel plant, as well as, reduce environmental pollution by reducing rates of N, P, and K fertilizers by sprinkling with salicylic, tryptophan and ascorbic acids.

                                                                                                                           

Material and Methods

Fennel seeds of local variety (Foeniculum Vulgare Mill) was sown on 1st and 2nd Nov.2016 and 2017 seasons, respectively in rows 60 cm apart and hills 30 cm in between. The experimental unit was 2X2 m2 contains 24 plants (4 rows, each row was cultured with 6 plants). After complete germination the seedlings were thinned to one plant / hill on 21st and 23rd Dec. 2016 and 2017 seasons, respectively.Soil samples of the experimental area in private Farm at Maghnin village, Koum Hamada city, El-Behera Governorate, Egypt, were collected at 10, 20 and 30 cm in depth then mixed carefully to determine the physical and chemical parameters (Table 1) according to Jackson (1973).   

                                                                                                                           

Table (1). Some physical and chemical parameters of the experimental soil.

 

Physical parameters

Sand %

Silt%

Clay%

Textural class

24.68

35.71

39.61

Clayey

 

Chemical parameters

pH

EC

O.M

Soluble Cations(meq/l)

Soluble onions(meq/l)

Ca

Mg

Na

Co3--

Hco3-

So4--

Cl-

7.51

1.47

1.44

1.62

5.00

7.40

0

4.00

6.80

4.00

              

The experiment design:

The experiment was setup as a split plot design whereas, NPK fertilizers were arranged at random in the main plots and the used acids were arranged at random in the subplots, The experiment was replicated three times each replicate contained 20 treatments (4 NPK doses X 5 treatments of used acids).

The treatments of NPK were: 1) 100% NPK dose (suggested dose = 150+150+50kg/fed of ammonium sulphate (20.5% N), calcium super phosphate (15.5 %P2O5) and potassium sulphate (48% K2O), respectively, 2) 75% NPK dose, 3) 50% NPK dose, and 4) 25% NPK dose. Where, calcium superphosphate was added as one dose at soil preparation before planting. While ammonium sulphate and potassium sulphate were divided into two equal doses, first dose was added two days after the thinning and the second one was added one month from the first dose in the two seasons.

 

The treatments of the used acids were: 1) Control (disteld water), 2) 200 mg/l of each ascorbic acid (AA) and salisylic acid (SA), 3) 200 mg/l of each (AA)and tryptophan acid (TA), 4) 200 mg/l  of each (SA) and (TA), and 5) 100 mg/l of each (AA), (SA) and (TA).Where, the plants were sprayed 3 times on 26th  and  30th Dec., 26th  and 30th Jan. and 25th  Feb. and 1st March in 2016/217 and 2017/2018 seasons ,respectively. The plants were sprayed in morning to run off.

 

Data recorded, at the full flowering stage on 15th April and 21st for both seasons ,respectively, the following traits were measured 1) Vegetative and flowering traits [ plant  height(cm),  shoots number/plant, main stem diameter at 5 cm from soil surface(mm), umbels number/plant and umbels diameter (cm)],2) leaf green color degree (SPAD units) was estimated by Minolta SPAD-502, Japan (Markwell et al ., 1995), 3) Leaf NPK , where N% was determined by the modified micro–Kejeldahle method (Chemists and Horwitz, 1990), P% by colorimetrically spectronic (20) spectrophotometer (Murphy and Riley, 1962), and K% by flame photometer (Cotteine et al.,1982) and 4) At harvesting time on  4th Jun and 1st Jun. in the two seasons,  respectively. The following traits were recorded. Dry weight/plant (g), fruits weight/ plant (g), weight of 100 fruits (g) , total carbohydrate percentage in seeds according to Herbert et al. (1971), essential oil % in the air dried fruits (British Pharmacopoeia, 1963), whereas,

 essential oil % =  × 100 and essential oil yield/plant = essential oil % × fruits weight /plant (ml).

 

The statistical analysis:

Duncan’s Multiple Rang Test was used to compare the treatments mean at 0.05 level of probabily according to Snedecor and Cochran (1989).

 

Results and Discussion

3.1 Effect of NPK doses, used acids and their interaction on vegetative and flowering parameters:

In respect to NPK doses, data in Table 2 showed that 100% NPK dose resulted in significant increases in vegetative growth traits (plant height, shoots number/plant main stem diameter, leaf green color degree (LGCD) and dry weight /plant) and flowering traits (umbels number /plant and umbel diameter) in comparing to the 75, 50 and 25% NPK doses in the two seasons. Too, it is noticed that the differences among the NPK doses reached the significant level (p > 0.05) for all such traits mentioned before,  expect for number of shoots in the first season and umbel diameter in the second one,  whereas the difference between 100% and 75% doses did not reach the significant level.

 

This result may be due to that 100% suggested NPK dose was suitable for reaching the soil with N, P, and K nutrients, because N, P and K are essential to all crops .N is the element that most limits crop yield.

 

Most of N in plants is an organic form: nucleic acids, amino acids proteins, some vitamins, harmonies, membrane component, coenzymes and pigment. P is an essential component of the energy transfer compounds (ATP, ADP and other nuclei proteins), the genetic information system, cell membranes and phospho-lipids. K is serving as an enzyme activator or cofactor for some enzymes, it also aided in the maintenance of osmotic potential and water uptake (Khorshidi et al., 2009). These results are in accordance to these of Abaas (2014) who found that the highest values of all growth parameters of sage plant were obtained at 230 kg N ha-1 +80 kg P ha-1. He added that the effect of N and P may belong to role of them in accumulation of chlorophyle material which very important in photosynthesis process and other physiological processes in plant. Likewise, Waskela et al. (2017) cleared that 60+40+40 NPK kg ha-1 exhibited significant maximum growth, yield attributes, yield and quality of fennel. Additionally, Al-Mansour et al. (2018) revealed that application of recommended FYM (10 t ha-1) along with recommended NPK (160:80:80 kg ha-1) recorded the highest fresh herbage yield of sweet basil.

 

Table (2). The Mean Effect of NPK doses on vegetative and flowering traits of                   fennel in  2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons

 

Parameters

NPK doses (kg/fed)

1st season

2nd season

100%

75%

50%

25%

100%

75%

50%

25%

Plant height (cm)

180.90A

175.53B

170.02C

165.03D

165.54A

160.59B

155.78C

151.10D

Shoots number/plant

11.53A

11.13AB

10.73B

10.53B

10.53A

10.13B

9.80C

9.73C

Main steam diameter(mm)

4.62A

4.02D

3.48C

3.15D

4.39A

3.81B

3.36C

3.03D

LGCD (spad units )

49.15A

41.29B

38.79BC

34.92C

46.69A

41.79B

37.38C

33.15D

Dry weight/plant (g)

165.91A

147.29B

131.70C

118.36D

94.97A

82.30A

83.55A

76.57C

Umbels number /plant

211.53A

174.80B

153.13C

119.13D

163A

147.26B

122.86C

87.25D

Umbel diameter (cm)

13.74A

13.13B

12.64C

12.19D

12.33A

12.34AB

12.00BC

11.68C

In the same row means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT at 0.05 level probability

Regarding the effect of acids treatments data in Table 3 cleared that all treatments of the used acids exhibited significant increases in plant height, shoots number/plant, stem diameter, LGCD, dry weight/plant, umbels number/plant and umbel diameter in compassion to the control treatment in the two seasons expect for shoots number in the first season, where the differences among the all treatment did not reach the significant level. In the sometime, the treatment 100 mg/l of each AA, SA and TA significantly increased the values of aforementioned traits over than the after used stimulants treatments in the both seasons, with exception in case of shoots number in the first season.

 

It is abvioused from the resulted that the most effectiveness treatment was 100 mg/l of each AA, SA, and TA may be 100 mg/l of each occurred a balance among the used stimulants that reflected on the plant growth .Also, amino acids play wide roles in plants including acting as regulatory and signaling molecules. Amino acids affect synthesis and activity of some enzymes, gene expression, and redox homeostasis (Rai, 2002). Too SA acts on the growth and development of the plant and, for this reason, is also regarded as a plant hormone (Liu et al., 2011). This result was supported by Youssef (2014) revealed that the tallest plant, the highest number of flowering heads and their fresh and dry weights of Echinacea purpurea were recorded by 200ppm tryptophan combined with 150ppm Zn. Likewise, Ali et al. (2017) on fennel plants found that 100 or 200 ppm ascorbic acid or salicylic acid improved plant growth and flowering traits.

 

Table (3). The Mean Effect of the used acids on vegetative and flowering traits of  fennel in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons

 

Parameters

AA,SA and TA treatments (mg/l)

1stseason

2ndseason

Control

200mg/l of each AA and SA

200mg/l of each AA and TA

200 mg/l of each SA and TA

100 mg/l of each AA,SA and TA

Control

200mg/l of each AA and SA

200mg/l OF each AA and TA

200mg/l of each SA and TA

100mg/l of each AA,SA and TA

Plant height (cm)

163.62E

167.32D

177.08B

172.16C

184.175 A

142.42E

149.95D

166.13B

157.86C

174.90A

Shoots number/plant

10.33 A

10.58A

11.33 A

11.00A

11.66 A

9.08E

9.50D

10.41B

10.16 C

11.08A

Main steam diameter (mm)

3.45 E

3.65D

3.89B

3.82C

4.27 A

3.30E

3.48D

3.77B

3.64 C

4.04A

LGCD (spad units

37.47C

39.67AB

43.84AB

37.96C

46.26 A

35.78E

37.66D

41.75B

39.63C

43.95A

Dry weight /plant (g)

126.35E

133.55D

147.17B

140.98C

156.04 A

70.89D

78.32C

90.08B

82.72C

99.73A

Umbels number /plant

146.41E

154.83D

173.58B

164.00C

184.41 A

117.75E

123.75D

136.16B

130.16C

143.25A

Umbel diameter (cm)

11.61E

12.29D

13.56B

12.92C

14.24A

11.04E

11.62D

12.84B

12.15C

13.52A

In the same row means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT at 0.05 level probability

 

 

 

Table (4). Effect of interaction of NPK doses and used acids on vegetative and flowering traits of fennel in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons

Treatment

1stseason

2ndseason

NPK doses

(kg/fed)

AA,SA,TA

(mg/l)

Plant

Height

(cm

Shoots

Number

/plant

Stem

Diameter

(mm)

L.GC.D

(SPAD

Units)

Dry

Weight/plant

Umbels

Number

/plant

Umbels

Diameter (cm)

Plant

Height

(cm

Shoots

Number

/plant

Stem

Diameter

(mm)

L.GC.D

(SPAD

Units)

Dry

Weight/plant

Umbels

Number

/plant

Umbels

Diameter

(cm)

100%

 

control

171.20e

11.00a

4.16f

44.27b-f

149.51g

190.66e

12.33ij

149.00o

9.33d

3.96 d

42.02 g

81.27 e-g

147.00 e

11.51 l

200of each AA,SA

175.10d

11.00a

4.56c

46.56a-d

157.17e

199.33d

13.21g

156.86k

10.00c

4.16 c

44.24 e

84.84 d-f

155.00 d

12.12 gg

200of each AA,TA

185.50b

12.00a

4.33df

51.60 ab

172.40b

221.33b

14.39b

173.81

11.00b

4.46 b

49.02 b

100.61 b

171.66 b

13.49 c

200of each SA,TA

180.13c

11.66a

4.73b

49.01a-c

166.95c

213.66c

13.67de

165.10gc

10.66b

4.43b

46.56c

91.17cd

163.00c

12.82f

100 of each AA,SA,TA

192.60a

12.00a

5.30a

54.31a

183.55a

232.66a

15.12a

182.93a

11.66a

4.93a

51.60a

116.98a

181.00a

14.20a

75%

control

166.05f

10.33a

3.63i

39.39d-i

132.23j

156.33i

11.78kl

144.36q

9.00d

3.43hi

37.62l

62.53h

134.00g

11.18n

200of each AA,SA

169.83e

11.00a

3.83h

41.71c-h

139.34i

165.00h

12.40i

152.16m

10.00c

3.63fg

39.59j

74.46g

141.00e

11.78k

200of each AA,TA

179.86c

11.33a

4.2ef

46.08a-e

154.61f

184.00f

13.74cd

168.60e

10.66b

3.96d

43.87

91.88cd

152.66d

13.06e

200of each SA,TA

174.73d

11.00a

3.96g

30.65i

146.88h

174.00g

13.41e-g

160.36i

10.00c

3.80e

41.68h

80.83e-g

148.33

12.40h

100 of each AA,SA,TA

187.16b

12.00a

4.43d

48.61a-c

163.42d

194.66e

14.13b

177.46b

11.00b

4.23c

46.18d

101.80b

160.33c

13.74b

50%

control

161.03g

7.00b

3.13m

34.77g-i

118.79l

132.33l

11.37m

140.20s

9.00d

3.06k

33.67q

75.52g

110.33k

10.80o

200of each AA,SA

164.66f

10.33a

3.26kl

37.30e-i

125.20k

143.66j

12.00k

147.60p

9.00d

3.23j

35.44o

79.82e-g

116.66j

11.37lm

200of each AA,TA

173.76d

11.00a

3.70i

41.63c-h

137.01i

164.33h

13.26fg

163.53h

10.00c

3.50gh

39.27k

87.00c-e

129.00h

12.60g

200of each SA,TA

169.46e

11.00a

3.43j

36.74 f-i

131.64j

153.66i

12.60hi

155.53l

10.00c

3.30ij

37.18m

81.43e-g

122.66i

11.97j

100 of each AA,SA,TA

181.20 c

11.33 a

3.90 gh

43.51 b-g

145.87 h

171.66 g

14.00 c

172.26 d

11.00 b

3.70 ef

41.34 r

94.00 bc

135.66 g

13.27 d

25%

control

156.20h

10.00a

2.86 n

31.43 i

104.88 n

106.33 o

10.96 n

136.13 t

9.00 d

2.76 m

29.78 t

64.26 h

79.66 o

10.66 o

200of each AA,SA

159.70g

10.00a

2.96n

33.09hi

112.51m

111.33n

11.54lm

143.16r

9.00d

2.90lm

31.35s

74.17g

82.33o

11.22mn

200of each AA,TA

169.20e

11.00a

3.30k

36.06f-i

124.67k

124.66m

12.87h

158.60j

10.00c

3.16jk

34.85p

80.85e-g

91.33m

12.22i

200of each SA,TA

164.33f

10.33a

3.16lm

35.44f-i

118.43l

114.66n

12.03jk

150.66n

10.00c

3.03kl

33.09r

77.47fg

86.66n

11.44l

100 of each AA,SA,TA

175.73d

11.33a

3.46j

38.60d-i

131.29j

138.66k

13.55d-f

166.93f

100.66b

3.30ij

36.67n

86.13c-e

86.00l

12.86f

In the same column means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT at 0.05 level probability

 

Concerning the interaction effect, the presented results in Table 4 demonstrated that the treatment of 100% NPK dose combined with 100 mg/l of each AA, SA, and TA caused significant increases in plant height, shoots number / plant, main steam diameter, leaf green color degree, dry weight / plant umbels number / plant and umbel diameter in comparison to the other interaction treatments in the two seasons. On the other side, the treatment of 25% NPK dose without spray with stimulants gave the least significant values of such traits, expect for shoots number / plant in the first season .where this fact result from 50% NPK dose without spray with stimulants. The differences among the interaction treatments reached the significant level in the most cases during the both seasons.

 

These results are in harmony with those of El- Tarawy et al. (2012) who reported that the treatment of 75% NPK (112.5, 112.5 and 37.5 kg /fed of ammonium sulphate, calcium superphosphate and potassium sulphate, respectively) plus 200 mg/l of each ascorbic and salicylic acids recorded the best results of branches number /plant, herb fresh and dry weights and umbels number/plant. El-Mahrouk et al. (2016) mentioned that the significantly highest values of plant height, shoots number / plant and fresh and dry

weights of sage plant resulted from ¾ NPK dose ( 225+150+75 kg /fed of ammonium sulphate, calcium superphosphate and potassium sulphate , respectively) plus 200 ppm ascorbic acid .

 

 Effect of NPK doses, used stimulants and their interaction on seed yield, essential oil and chemical composition.

 As for NPK doses, data in Table (5) showed that the treatment of 100% NPK dose was the most significant effective in increasing weight of 100 seeds, essential oil % and yield/plant, leaf N, P and K% and total carbohydrates% in fruits in comparing to the other NPK doses in the two seasons .While the significantly highest value of seed yield / plant was recorded for 75%NPK dose in the both seasons. It is clear from the results that the values of such traits decreased gradually with decreasing NPK doses with one exception of seed yield / plant whereas, 75% NPK dose caused an increase over than 100% NPK dose in the two seasons . The results indicated that 100% NPK dose was the suitable for yield, essential oil productively and chemical composition, that may be referred to that NPK play important roles in the physiological, chemical and biochemical processes in plant cell and the genetic information system, which positively reflect on the plant development and its yield and chemical composition. These results confirmed with those of Nik et al. (2011) on Ajowan plant who found that 120 kg, N 200 kg P, 150 kg K , 25kg Zn and 25 kg Mg per ha had significant effect on seed yield . Yousuf et al. (2014) mentioned that N, P, K and S at 70, 50, 30 and 20 kg / ha gave the highest seed yield of coriander. Waskela et al. (2017) found that NPK at 60+60+40 kg/ ha exhibited significant maximum yield of fennel. Al –Mansour et al. (2018) showed that the higher essential oil % and yield of sweet basil resulted from 10 t/ha FYM +NPK (160+30+80kg /ha).

Concerning AA, SA, and TA effect, data in Table 6 pointed out that the used treatments of stimulants caused significant increases in yield, essential oil and chemical composition parameters under study over than the control treatment. Meanwhile, the treatment of 100 mg/l of each AA, SA, and TA had positive pronounced effect on such traits in comparing to the other ones in the two seasons. These results may be attributed to that 100 mg/l of each AA, SA, and TA was the suitable level, which caused better balance among them, that reflected on the plant yield and chemical composition. Also, a plant bio-stimulant is any substance or microorganism applied to plants with the aim to enhance nutrition efficiency, abiotic stress tolerance and/or crop quality traits, regardless of its nutrients content (Patrick, 2015). SA, AA and TA play crucial roles in the regulation of physiological and biochemical processes during the entire life span of the plant (Karnok, 2000; Vicente and Plasencia, 2011 and Rasmy et al., 2012).

 

Parameters

NPK doses (kg/fed)

1st season

2nd season

100%

75%

50%

25%

100%

75%

50%

25%

Seed yield/plant

57.29B

68.04A

55.21C

45.22D

52.99B

64.15A

53.62B

34.09C

Weight of 100 seed(g)

1.36A

1.22B

1.09C

1.02D

1.31A

1.16B

1.06C

0.97D

Essential oil%

2.38A

1.88B

1.69C

1.49D

2.15A

1.83AB

1.53BC

1.42C

Essential oil yield/plant

1.39A

1.28B

0.93C

0.68D

1.15A

1.17A

0.82B

0.42C

N %

2.57A

2.47B

2.32C

2.24D

2.51A

2.37D

2.20C

2.13D

P %

0.36A

0.33B

0.30C

0.27D

0.32A

0.32A

0.29B

0.25C

K %

3.18A

2.82B

2.52C

2.14D

2.99A

2.70B

2.40C

2.02D

Carbohydrate %

13.84A

13.29B

12.59C

11.74D

11.87A

12.62A

11.96A

11.15A

Table (5). Effect of NPK doses on seed yield, essential oil and chemical in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons composition of fennel               

In the same row means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT at 0.05 level probability

   

These results are similar to thoseofIbrahim and Taha (2016) revealed that the highest values of total soluble sugars and N, P and K % of Ficus  microcarpa were recorded for the plants treated with 150 mg/l tryptophan. Ali et al. (2017) found that application of AA at 100 mg/l gave the maximum essential oil yield of fennel. Additionally, Yeganehpoor et al. (2017) reported that SA at 1mM led to increment in seed oil of coriander.

 


 

Table (6). Effect of the used acids on seed yield essential oil and chemical  

                 composition fennel in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons

 

Parameters

AA,SA and TA treatments (mg/l)

1stseason

2ndseason

Control

200mg/l of each AA and SA

200mg/l OF each AA and TA

200mg/l of each SA and TA

100mg/l of each AA,SA and TA

Control

200mg/l of each AA and SA

200mg/l OF each AA and TA

200mg/l of each SA and TA

100mg/l of each AA,SA and TA

Seed yield/plant (g)

48.09 D

51.52C

56.30B

55.97B

70.31A

43.94D

47.78C

52.70B

48.62C

63.02A

Weight of 100seed(g)

1.05E

1.12D

1.23B

1.17C

1.30A

1.01E

1.07D

1.18B

1.13C

1.24A

Essential oil%

1.70D

1.78CD

1.95 AB

1.87 BC

2.01A

1.57E

1.64D

1.81B

1.73 C

1.91 A

Essential oil yield/plant(ml)

0.81D

0.92C

1.10B

1.06B

1.47A

0.69D

0.79C

0.96B

0.85C

1.24 A

N %

2.21E

2.30D

2.46B

2.41C

2.61A

2.13E

2.19D

2.39B

2.31C

2.49 A

P %

0.28E

0.30D

0.33B

0.32C

0.35A

0.28D

0.29D

0.32B

0.30C

0.33 A

K %

2.36E

2.49D

2.81B

2.67C

2.99A

2.20D

2.42C

2.65B

2.46C

2.87A

Carbohydrate %

11.57E

12.18D

13.57D

12.82C

14.20A

10.72E

11.29D

12.51D

11.80C

13.17A

In the same row means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT at 0.05 level probability

 

 

In regard to the interaction effect data in Table 7 indicated that the combination treatments of NPK doses and used stimulants had differently exhibit effects on seed yield / plant, essential oil % and yield / plant, weight of 100 seed and percentages of N, P, K and carbohydrate in the two season. Meanwhile, the treatment of 100% NPK dose combined with 100 mg/l of each AA, SA and TA resulted in significant increases in such traits over than the other ones in the both seasons. In the same time, the plants received 25% NPK dose and did not treat with stimulants had the least significant values of such traits aforementioned in the two season.

 

These results are in agreement with those of El-Tarawy et al. (2012) revealed that total carbohydrate % and essential oil productivity of fennel were higher from application of 75% NPK dose + 200 ppm AA+SA. Also, El- Mahrouk et al. (2016) cleared that the essential oil yield / plant ,N,P,K  and carbohydrate % in sage plant resulted from ¾ NPK dose +200mg /l AA (NPK full dose is 300+200+100kg/fed of ammonium sulphate, calcium super phosphate and potassium sulphate, respectively ). Finally, Sakr et al. (2018) mentioned that extract of moringa at 6g/l, 600+300+150 kg /fed of NPK, respectively and aloe at 75 ml/l resulted in a positive increase in oil production and chemical composition of Pelargonium graveolens.

 

Treatment

1stSeason

2ndseason

NPK doses

(kg/fed

AA,SA,TA

(mg/l)

Seed yield/plant(g)

Weight of 100 seed(g)

Essential oil%

Essential

oil yield/

Plant(ml)

N %

P %

K %

Carbohydrate %

Seed yield/plant(g)

Weight of 100 seed(g)

Essential oil%

Essential oil yield/

Plant(ml)

N %

P %

K %

Carbohydrate %

 

 

 

100%

 

Control

40.93o

1.21a

2.16cd

0.88g-i

2.39a

0.32a

2.80e

12.40fg

39.40i

1.19a

2.02a

0.79gh

2.34ef

0.30a

2.64de

10.74j

200of each AA,SA

46.70o

1.29a

2.26bc

1.05d-f

2.49a

0.34a

2.98d

13.05de

44.26g-i

1.25a

2.08a

0.92e-g

2.34ef

0.32a

2.80cd

11.31j

200of each      AA,TA

48.66k

1.43a

2.45ab

1.19cd

2.54a

0.38a

2.42b

14.80b

53.63ef

1.36a

2.20a

1.18cd

2.60d

0.36a

3.18ab

12.53cd

200of each SA,TA

56.13h

1.36a

2.38b

1.33bc

2.60a

0.36a

3.16c

13.74c

49.05f-h

1.32a

2.15a

1.05d-f

2.53c

0.34a

2.97dc

11.57gh

100 of each AA,SA,TA

94.06a

1.51a

2.66a

2.50a

2.83a

0.40a

3.56a

15.23a

78.64a

1.43a

2.32a

1.82a

2.74a

0.37a

3.35a

13.19b

 

 

 

75%

Control

61.04f

1.10a

1.76f-i

1.07de

2.27a

0.30a

2.49g

11.96h

57.83c-e

1.04a

1.63a

0.94e-g

2.18ij

0.32a

2.33f-h

13.36hi

200of each AA,SA

64.23e

1.16a

1.85e-h

1.19cd

2.37a

0.32a

2.64f

12.60f

63.43cd

1.10a

1.72a

1.09c-e

2.27gh

0.30a

2.75cd

11.96e

200of each      AA,TA

71.16c

1.28a

2.03de

1.44b

2.57a

0.34a

2.98d

13.96c

65.06bc

1.24a

1.92a

1.25c

2.46d

0.33a

2.80cd

13.26b

200of each SA,TA

67.61d

1.22a

1.94d-f

1.31bc

2.46a

0.33a

2.81e

13.26d

62.58cd

1.16a

1.82a

1.14cd

2.36a

0.32a

2.64de

12.59c

100 of each AA,SA,TA

76.17b

1.35 a

1.84e-h

1.40b

2.68a

0.37a

3.17c

14.69b

71.84ab

1.28a

2.05a

1.47b

2.57bc

0.35a

2.98bc

13.95a

 

 

 

50%

Control

49.69jk

0.99 a

1.54j-l

0.76ij

2.13a

0.27a

2.30ij

11.34j

49.35f-h

0.95a

1.36a

0.67

2.02mn

0.26a

2.11hi

10.77j

200of each AA,SA

52.31i

1.04a

1.59i-k

0.83b

2.22a

0.28a

2.34hi

11.93h

52.37ef

1.00a

1.44a

0.75

2.12kl

0.29a

2.33f-h

11.33hi

200of each      AA,TA

57.93g

1.13a

1.76f-i

1.02e-g

2.41a

0.31a

2.65f

13.22d

55.42d-f

1.11a

1.60a

0.89fg

2.49fg

0.31a

2.51ef

12.56cd

200of each SA,TA

55.06h

1.10a

1.68g-j

0.92f-h

2.32a

0.30a

2.49j

12.56f

51.72e-g

1.06a

1.52a

0.79gh

2.20ij

0.29a

2.24gh

11.93ef

100 of each AA,SA,TA

61.06f

1.22a

1.88e-g

1.15de

2.51a

0.33a

2.82e

13.92c

59.23c-e

1.16a

1.70a

1.01d-f

2.39 e

0.32a

2.80cd

13.22b

 

 

 

25%

Control

40.70

0.92a

1.34l

0.54 l

2.06a

0.24a

1.87m

10.57k

29.18j

0.87a

1.26a

0.37j

1.98 n

0.23a

1.57k

10.03k

200of each AA,SA

42.84n

0.97a

1.42kl

0.61 kl

2.14a

0.25a

1.99l

11.12 j

31.08j

0.92a

1.34a

0.41j

2.06 lm

0.24a

1.86jk

10.56j

200of each      AA,TA

47.47l

1.07a

1.56i-k

0.74 i-k

2.32a

0.28a

2.21jk

12.33g

36.69ij

1.02a

1.50a

0.55ij

2.23 hi

0.27a

2.12g-j

11.71fg

200of each SA,TA

45.10m

1.02a

1.49j-l

0.76 j-l

2.26a

0.27a

2.20k

11.72i

31.15j

0.97a

1.42a

0.44j

2.14 jk

0.25a

1.99ij

11.12i

100 of each AA,SA,TA

49.97j

1.13a

1.66h-j

0.83 hi

2.42a

0.30a

2.41gh

12.98e

42.37hi

1.07a

1.58a

0.67hi

2.27 gh

0.28a

2.36fg

12.32d

Table (7).Effect of interaction of NPK doses and used acids on seed yield, essential oil and chemical composition of fennel in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons

In the same column means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to DMRT at 0.05 level probability


CONCLUSION

In order to achieve the best growth, seed yield, seed essential oil production and chemical constituents of fennel plants, it must be fertilized it by 100% NPK suggested dose combined with 100 mg/l of each ascorbic, salicylic and tryptophan acids.

 

References
Abaas, I. S. (2014).The study of biometric and volatile oil quantity of sage             plant(Salvia officinalis, L.) as medicinal plant affected by nitrogen and             phosphorus fertilizers. Int. J. Pharm. Sci., 6(6): 82-83.

Arab, A., G. R.Zamani, M. H.Sayyari and J.Asili (2015).Effects of chemical and   biological fertilizers on morpho-physiological traits of marigold (Calendula   officinalis L.). Eur. J. Med. Pl., 8(1): 60-68.

Ali, A.F., E.A. Hassan, E.H. Hamad and W.M.H. Abo-Quta (2017). Effect of             compost, ascorbic acid and salicylic acid treatments on growth, yield and oil             production of fennel plant. Assiut J. Agric. Sci., 48(1-1): 139-154.

Al-Mansour, B., D.Kalaivanan, M. A.Suryanarayana, K.Umeshaand and A. K.            Nair (2018).Influence of organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield and             quality of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicumL.).J. Spices &Aromatic Crops.,            27 (1): 38-44.

Bahmani, K., A. Izadi-Darbandi, A.A. Jafari, S.A.S. Noori and M. Farajpour            (2012). Assessment of genetic diversity in Iranian fennels using ISSR             Markers. J. Agric. Sci., 4: 79-84.

British Pharmacopoeia (1963). Determination of volatile oil in Drags. The British            Pharmaceutical Press, London.

Castro, P.R.C. and E.L. Vieira (2001). Applications of plant regulators in tropical             agriculture . Guaíba: Livraria and Editora Agropecuária, 2001. 132 p.

Chemists, A. A. and W. Horwitz (1990). Official methods of analysis. Val. 1.15th                    ed.AOAC, Arlington, VA.

Cottenie, A., M. Verloo, M. Velghe and R.Camerlynck (1982). Chemical analysis            of plant and soil. Laboratory of Analytical and Agrochemistry. State Univ.            Ghent, Belgium.

El-Mahrouk, E.M., F.I.Radwan , A. I. Abido and A. H. Hammam (2016 ). Effect of some fertilization treatments on vegetative growth, oil production and chemical composition of  sage plant  J. Adv. Agric. Res. (Fac. Agri. Saba             Basha)., 21(3):400- 413.

El-Tarawy, M.  A., E.M. El-Mahrouk, S.K. Ahmed and A.Y.E Shala(2012). Response of fennel plants to NPK, ascorbic and salicylic acids. J. Agric.Res Kafr El-Sheikh Univ., 38(3): 401-419.

Herbert, D., P. J. Phipps and R. E. Strange (1971). Determination of total             carbohydrates. Methods: Microbial., 5(B): 290-344.

Ibrahim, S.M.M. and L. S. Taha (2016). Assimilation of Ficus microcarpa “Hawaii” (v) plant growth and chemical constituents to peptone and

            tryptophan foliar application. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res., 9(10): 201-206.

Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice –Hall of India, Private              Limited, New Delhi.

Karnok, K.J. (2000). Promises,: Can bio stimulants deliver? Numerous product            ingredients are called bio stimulants, and they all promise to promote             turfgrass growth and health. Golf course management. Int. Plant Nut.            Institute (IPNI)., 68(8): 67-71.

Khorshidi, J., M.F. Tabatabaei, R. Omidbaigi and F. Seidkon (2009).The effect              of different densities of planting on morphological characters, yield, and yield components of fennel (FoeniculumVulgare Mill cv Soroksary).

            J. Agric. Sci., 1(2):66-73.                                                                                                      

Li, W.J. and Y.Z. Ni (1996). Researches on application of microbial inoculant in   crop production. In: Researches and application of En. technology, Agric. Univ. Press, Beijing, China, pp: 42 - 84.

Markwell, J., J. C. Osterman and J. L. Mitchell (1995). Calibration of the Minalta             SPAD- 502 Leaf  chlorophyll meter. Phtosyn. Res., 46:467-472.

Moradi,R., P., R. Moghaddam, M. N. Mahallati and A. Nezhadali (2011). Effects of organic and biological fertilizers on fruit yield and essential oil of sweet fennel (Foeniculum vulgare var.dulce).Spanish J. Agric. Res., 9(2): 546-553.

Murphy, J. and J. H. Riley (1962). A modified single solution for the determination of phosphate in natural wastes. Anmal. Chem. Acta., 27:31-36.

Nik, S.M.M., M.Salari, H.R. Mobasser and M.H.B.Keshavarzi (2011). The effect of different irrigation intervals and mineral nutrition on seed of ajowan (Trachyspermum ammi). Ann. Bio. Res., 2(6):692-698.

Patrick, DJ. (2015).Plant biostimulants: definition,concept, main categories and  regulation.Scientia Horti.; 196: 3 - 14.

Rai.V.K (2002). Role of Amino Acids in Plant Responses to Stresses . Bio plant  Arum., 45(4):481-487.

Rasmy, N., M. Amal, A. Hassan, M. I. Foda and M. M. El-Moghazy (2012)

 Assessment of the antioxidant activity of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) extracts on shelf life of mayonnaise.World J. dairy & Food Sci.,7(1):28-40.

Sakr, W. R.A., A.A. El-Sayed, A.M. Hammouda and F.S.A. Saad El Deen  (2018). Effect of NPK, aloe gel and moringa extracts on geranium plants. J. Hort. Sci. & Ornam. Pl.,10 (1): 01-16.

Saravanaperumal, S.A.and A. L.Terza(2012).Polyphenolics free DNA isolation and optimization of PCRRAPD for fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) from mature and young leaves. Afri. J. Biotech., 11(35):8622 8631.

Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran (1989). Statistical Methods. Eighth edition.The Iowa State Univ. Press Ames. Iowa, USA   

Vicente, M. R. and J.Plasencia (2011).Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot., 62(10): 3321-3338.

Waskela, P., I. S.Naruka and R. P. S.Shaktawat (2017). Effect of row spacing              and level of NPK on growth and yield of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare).J. KrishiVigyan., 6(1): 78-82.

Yeganehpoor, F., S.Z.Salmasi, K. G.Golezani, J.S.Kolvanagh, and S.    Dastborhan (2017). The impact of Nitrokara and salicylic acid on proline content and essential oil composition of coriander under  different water supply.  Amer. J. Essen Oils & Nat

           Products, 5(3): 32-40.   

Youssef, A.S.M. (2014). Influence of some amino acids and micro-nutrients         treatments on growth and chemical constituents of Echinacea purpurea plant. J.Plant Production, Mansoura Univ., 5 (4): 527-543.

Yousuf, M. N., S. Brahma, M. M. Kamal, S. Akter and M. E. K. Chowdhury            (2014). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulphur on the            growth and seed yield of coriander (Coriandrum sativum            L.).Bangladesh. J. Agril. Res., 39(2): 303-309.

Statistics
Article View: 239
PDF Download: 450
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.