ElFayomy, A., Yousry, M., El-Behairy, U. (2021). Response Of Lettuce To Humic Acid And Salt Stress Condition Under Soilless Culture System. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 26(1), 20-38. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.165362
Ahmed ElFayomy; Mona Mohamed Yousry; Usama Ahmed El-Behairy. "Response Of Lettuce To Humic Acid And Salt Stress Condition Under Soilless Culture System". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 26, 1, 2021, 20-38. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.165362
ElFayomy, A., Yousry, M., El-Behairy, U. (2021). 'Response Of Lettuce To Humic Acid And Salt Stress Condition Under Soilless Culture System', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 26(1), pp. 20-38. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.165362
ElFayomy, A., Yousry, M., El-Behairy, U. Response Of Lettuce To Humic Acid And Salt Stress Condition Under Soilless Culture System. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2021; 26(1): 20-38. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2021.165362
Response Of Lettuce To Humic Acid And Salt Stress Condition Under Soilless Culture System
1Department of Plant Production, Vegetable, Faculty of Agriculture, Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Egypt.
2Department of Vegetable Crpos , Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Egypt;
Abstract
The study was carried out at theprivate Farm of Borg El Arab, Alexandria, Egypt, during the seasons of (2016/2017 and 2017/2018) to study the effect of humic acid on lettuce yield under salt stress condition using soilless culture system. The experiments were carried out in a Factorial experiment consisted of sixteen treatments arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates for each treatment. The humic acid rates (0, 100, 200 and 400 mg/l) were arranged in the main plots, whereas, the four salt stress rates (control, 400, 800 and 1200mg/l) were arranged in the sub plots. The results indicated that, the yield and its components gradually increased with the increasing of humic acid rate at 400 mg/l such as, (head diameter, head fresh weight, head dry weight and yield/fed). Humic additions led to increase NPK content of lettuce leaves, total carbohydrates percentage and vitamin C content as compared with control treatment which recorded significantly decreased in all studied characteristics in both seasons. On another hand, salinity treatments significantly decreased all yield and its components whereas, sodium chloride at 1200 mg/l recorded the negative effect on head diameter, head fresh weight, head dry weight and yield/fed, also, it caused a significant decrease in chemical composition such as (N,P,K,Ca, Mg and Na), total carbohydrates percentage and vitamin C content of lettuce plants as compared with control treatment which recorded significantly increased in head diameter, head fresh weight, head dry weight and yield/fed, chemical composition i.e. (N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na), total carbohydrates percentage and vitamin C content during both seasons. Response Of LettuceTo Humic Acid And Salt Stress Condition Under Soilless Culture System
Abdel-Mawgoud, A. M. R., N. H. M. El-Greudy, Y. I. Helmy and S. M. Singer. (2007). Responses of tomato plants to different rates of humic based fertilizer and NPK fertilization. J. Appli. Sci. Res., 3(2): 169-174.
Adani, F., P. Genevini, P. Zaccheo and G. Zocchi (1998). The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nurtrition. J. Plant Nutr., 21: 561-575.
Allen Cooper (1979). The ABC of NFT. Grower books, library of Congress Catalog Card No. 79-670190. ISBN 0901361224.
Andriolo, J.L., G.L. Da Luz, M.H. Witter, R.S. Godoi, G.T. Barros and O.C. Bortolotto (2005). Growth and yield of lettuce plants under salinity. Hort. Brazil., 23: 931–934.
Anonymous, A. (2010). Humic and fulvic acids: The black gold of agriculture. Retrieved from www.humintech.com/pdf/humicfulvic acids.pdf.
AOAC (1985). Official methods of analysis pp 490-510. Association of Official Analytical ChemistsWashington, D.C.
Ashraf, M. and P.J.C. Harris (2004). Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants, Plant Sci., 166: 3-16.
Azevedo-neto, A.D., J.T. Prisco, J. Enéas-Filho, C.F. Lacerda, J.V. Silva, P.H.A. Costa and E. Gomes-Filho (2004). Effects of salt stress on plant growth, stomatal response and solute accumulation of different maize genotypes. Braz. J. Plant Physiol., 16: 31-38.
Bar-Yosef, B., T. Markovich and I. Levkovich, (2005). Lettuce response to leachate recycling in an arid zone greenhouse. Acta Hort., 697: 243– 250.
Chapman, H. D. and P.F. Pratt (1978). Method of Analysis for Soil and Water. 2nd Ed., Chapter, 17pp: 150-161. Uni. Calif. Div. Agric. Sci. USA.
Chen, Y. and T. Avaid (1990). Effect of humic substances on plant growth. Amer. Soci. Agron. Soil Sci., (eds): 161-186.
Chen, Y., D.E. Nobil and M. Aviad (2004). Stimulatory effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture (Magdoff F., WeilR. R., eds). CRC Press, NY, USA. pp. 103-129.
Csaba, B., L. Fodorpataki, M. d. C. Martinez-Ballesta, O. Popescu, M. Carvajal (2015). Sodium accumulation contributes to salt stress tolerance in lettuce cultivars. J. Appli. Bot. Food Qual., 88: 42 – 48.
De Pascale, S. and G. Barbieri (1995). Effects of soil salinity from long-term irrigation with saline-sodic water on yield and quality of winter vegetable crops. Sci. Hort., 64: 145–157.
Elkins, K.M. and D.J. Nelson (2002). Spectroscopic approaches to the study of the interaction of aluminium with humic substances. Coordin. Chem. Rev., 228: 205.
Eyheraguibel, B., J. Silvestre and P. Morard (2008). Effects of humic substances derived from organic waste enhancement on the growth and mineral nutrition of maize. Bioresource Technol., 99(10): 4206-4212.
Fageria, M.S., P.S. Arya, K. Jagmohan and A.K. Singh (1992). Effect of nitrogen levels on growth yield and quality of tomato. Veg. Sci., 19(1): 25-29.
Falmata, M., A.Adam, F.Aliyu, A. Mabu and M. Musa (2020). A Survey of Smart Hydroponic System. Advances in Science, Techn. Eng. Syst. J., 5( 1): 233-248.
Fernandez, J. A., D. Niñirola, J. Ochoa, F. Orsini, G. Pennisi, G. Gianquinto and C. Egea-Gilabert (2016). Root adaptation and ion selectivity affects the nutritional value of salt-stressed hydroponically grown baby-leaf Nasturtium officinale and Lactuca sativa. Agric. & Food Sci., 25: 230–239.
Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons. Inc., New York.
Grattan, S.R. and C.M. Grieve(1999). Salinity–mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops Sci. Hort. 78 127 157.
Halime, O.U., U. Husnu, K. Yasar and P. Huseyin (2011). Changes in fruit yield and quality in response to foliar and soil humic acid application in cucumber. Scientific Res. Essays, 6(13): 2800-2803.
Hoang, T.L. (2003). Untersuchungen zur Wirkung von Huminsäure auf das Wachstum und die Nährstoffaufnahme von Tomaten (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL) und Wasserspinat (Ipomoea aquatic NORSSK). PhD Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Landwirtschaftlich-Gärtnerische Fakultät.
Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis, Prentice Hall of India private limited, New Delhi, P. 498.
Karam, N.S. and B.H. Al-Daood (2005). Response of Asiatic lily to nutrient solution recycling in a closed soilless culture. Acta Hort., 697: 199–212.
Karlidag, H. A., E. E. Yildirim, M.G. Donmez and M. Turan (2011). Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria on yield growth, leaf water content, membrane permeability, and ionic composition of strawberry under saline conditions J. Plant Nutr., 34: 43- 45.
Kim, H.J., W.K. Kim and M.Y. Roh (2013). Automated sensing of hydroponic macronutrients using a computer-controlled system with an array of ion-selective electrodes, Comput. Electron. Agric., 93: 46–54.
Lee, Y.S. and R.J. Bartlett (1976). Stimulation of plant growth by humic substances. Soil Sci. Sec. Am. J., 40: 876-879.
Lowther, G.R. (1980). Using of a single H2So4 - H2O2 digest for the analysis of Pinus radiate needles. Commun. Soil Sci. pl. Analysis, 11: 175-188.
Mahadevan, A. and R. Sridhar (1986). Methods in physiological plant pathology. Sirakami publications 326.
Munns, R. and M. Tester (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 59: 651-681.
Nardi, S., D. Pizzeghello, A. Muscolo and A. Vianello (2002). Physiological effects of humic substances on higher plants. Soil Biol. Biochem., 34(11): 1527-1536.
Neocleous, D., A. Koukounaras, A.S. Siomos, M. Vasilakakis (2014). Assessing the salinity effects on mineral composition and nutritional quality of green and red “Baby” lettuce. J. Food Qual., 37 1-8.
Nguyen, N.T., S.A. McInturf and D.G. Mendoza-Cózatl (2016). Hydroponics: a versatile system to study nutrient allocation and plant responses to nutrient availability and exposure to toxic elements, J. Vis. Exp., 113.
Parida, A.K. and A.B. Das (2005). Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 60: 324- 349.
Resh, H.M. (2016). Hydroponic food production: a definitive guidebook for the advanced home gardener and the commercial hydroponic grower, Woodbridge Press, California.
Sangeetha, M. and P. Singaram (2006). Effect of fertilizers and lignite humic acid on quality parameters of onion var. CO 4. J. Agric. Resource Management, 4: 218-219.
Shabala, S., I. Shabala, T. Cuin, J. Pang, W. Percey, Z. Chen, S. Conn, C. Eing, L.Wegner (2010). Xylem ionic relations and salinity tolerance in barley. Plant J., 61: 839-853.
Shahid, S.A., M. Zaman and L. Heng (2018). Introduction to soil salinity, sodicity and diagnostics techniques. In: Guideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques. Springer Nature, Switzerland.
Shohael A.M., A.A. Hrisha, T. Ahamed and S.M. Khatun (2017). An easy and reproducible field to table technology for the production of hydroponics lettuce in Bangladesh, Int. J. Agron. Agric. Res., 10: 37-47.
Singh, A.B. and S.S. Singh (1992). Effect of various levels of nitrogen and spacing on growth, yield and quality of tomato. Veg. Sci., 19(1): 1-6.
Sonneveld, C. (1988). The salt tolerance of greenhouse crops. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci., 36: 63–73.
Tandon, H. (1995). Methods of Analysis of soil, plants, waters and ferilizer, p: 144. Fertilizers development and consultation organization, New Delhi, India.
Tzortzakis, N.G. (2009). Alleviation of salinity-induced stress in lettuce growth by potassium sulphate using nutrient film technique. Int. J. Veg. Sci., 15: 226–239.
Ünlükara, A., B. Cemek, S. Karaman and S. Erşahin, (2008). Response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. crispa) to salinity of irrigation water. New Zealand J. Crop Hort. Sci., 36: 265–273.
Viacava, G.E., G. Gonzalez-Aguilar and S.I. Roura (2014). Determination of phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in butter head lettuce related to leaf age and position. J. Food Biochem., 38: 352-362.
Winsor, W. and M. Schwarz (1990). Soilless culture for horticulture crop production, FAO Publications.
Yeshiwas, Y., B. Yikeber, B. Zewdie, A. Chekol and A. Walle (2018). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and farmyard manure on growth and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa, L.). Int. J. Agric. Res., 13: 74-79.
Yildirim, E., Taylor, A.G. and Spittler, T.D. (2006). Ameliorative effects of biological treatments on growth of squash plants under salt stress. Sci. Hort., 111: 1-6.
Zhao, Q., B.L. Ma and C.Z. Ren (2007). Growth, gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and ion content of naked oat in response to salinity. Crop Sci. 47, 123-131.
View on SCiNiTO
Top