• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 30 (2025)
Volume Volume 29 (2024)
Volume Volume 28 (2023)
Volume Volume 27 (2022)
Volume Volume 26 (2021)
Volume Volume 25 (2020)
Volume Volume 24 (2019)
Volume Volume 23 (2018)
Volume Volume 22 (2017)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 21 (2016)
Volume Volume 20 (2015)
Volume Volume 19 (2014)
Hassan, M., Badr, M., Abd El- Maksoud, B., El – Shennawy, O. (2017). Effect of Gamma Radiation on Genetic Improvement Against Salinity in Catharanthus Roseus Plants. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 22(3), 424-455. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2017.243819
Makka Hassan; Mustafa Badr; Bassouni Abd El- Maksoud; Ola El – Shennawy. "Effect of Gamma Radiation on Genetic Improvement Against Salinity in Catharanthus Roseus Plants". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 22, 3, 2017, 424-455. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2017.243819
Hassan, M., Badr, M., Abd El- Maksoud, B., El – Shennawy, O. (2017). 'Effect of Gamma Radiation on Genetic Improvement Against Salinity in Catharanthus Roseus Plants', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 22(3), pp. 424-455. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2017.243819
Hassan, M., Badr, M., Abd El- Maksoud, B., El – Shennawy, O. Effect of Gamma Radiation on Genetic Improvement Against Salinity in Catharanthus Roseus Plants. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2017; 22(3): 424-455. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2017.243819

Effect of Gamma Radiation on Genetic Improvement Against Salinity in Catharanthus Roseus Plants

Article 2, Volume 22, Issue 3 - Serial Number 84, September 2017, Page 424-455  XML PDF (425.22 K)
Document Type: Research papers
DOI: 10.21608/jalexu.2017.243819
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Makka Hassan; Mustafa Badr; Bassouni Abd El- Maksoud; Ola El – Shennawy
Floriculture & Ornamental Horticulture and Landscape Gardening Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University,
Abstract
The  experiments  were  carried out during the years of  2013, 2014  and  2015  in the Flowers   and   Ornamental   Plants   Research   Gardens   of   the   Faculty  of  Agriculture,  Alexandria   University,  Egypt. The objective of this research was to study the effect of  treating the seeds of  Catharanthus  roseus with different  gamma rays doses, i.e.0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 kr and  irrigation with  saline water (0,100 and 150 mM) on the morphological characteristics, proline content, alkaloids (vindolen and catharnthine) content and total carbohydrates content in  the leaves, variations, mutations and peroxidase  isozyme. Data on the effect of gamma radiation, salinity treatments and the  interaction  between  them revealed the followings results.
1-   Some variations in the morphological characteristics, such as habit of growth , leaf size,
      form and colour, stem colour and flower structure  and colour.
2- Highly significant increases in the proline content.
3a- Significant increases in the leaf vindolen content.
3b- Significant increases in the leaf catharnthine content.
4- No clear effect on the total carbohydrate content.

5- Twelve mutated plants with variation in branching, flowering and salt tolerance.
Keywords
Gamma; radiation; genetic; salinity; ornamental; plants
Main Subjects
Genetics; Horticulture
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. (Madagascar periwinkle)  is a tropical and subtropical ornamental plant  and  one of the most important medicinal plants (also known as anticancerous drug yield  in plant)  and also  an ornamental bedding plant belonging to the family Apocyanaceae (Jaleel et al.,2008).

 

Catharanthus roseus contains a virtual cornucopia of useful alkaloids, used in diabetes, blood pressure, asthma, constipation, and cancer and menetrual problems. There are about two common cultivars of C. roseus which is named on the basis of their flower colour that is the pink flowered “Rosea” and the white flowers “Alba”. Catharanthus roseus is found to be a species of Catharanthus native and also endemic to Madagascar. The synonyms of the plant name include Vinca rosea, Ammocallis  rosea and Lochnera  rosea, other English names occasionally used for the plant include Cape  periwinkle, rose periwinkle, rosy periwinkle and “old maid”.

 

Catharanthus roseus is an evergreen subherb or herbaceous plant growing to 1 m. tall. The leaves are oval to oblong, 2.5- 9.0 cm long and 1- 3.5 cm broad, glossy green hairless with a pale midrib and a short petiole about 1- 1.8 cm long arranged in opposite pairs. The flowers are white to dark pink with a dark red center; with a basal tube about 2.5- 3 cm long and a corolla about 2-5 cm diameter with five petal like lobes. The fruit is a pair of follicles about 2-4 cm  long and 3 mm broad.

 

Catharanthus  roseusposses carbohydrates, flavinoids, saponins and alkaloids. Alkaloids are the most potentially active chemical constituents of Catharanthus  roseus. More than 400 alkaloids are present in the plant, which are used as pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, flavor and fragrance ingredients, food additives and pesticides. The alkaloids like actineoplastidemeric, Vinblastin, Vincrestine, Vindesine, Vindeline Tabersonine etc. are mainly present in aerial parts whereas ajmalicine, vinceine, vineamine, raubasin, reserpine, catharanthine  etc are present in roots and basal stem. Rosindin is an anthocyanin pigment found in the flower of C. roseus(Sain and Sharma, 2013).

 

Aim of the work:

  1. Studying the effect of different doses of gamma radiation from cobalt 60  and salt water treatments on  the vegetative and flowering growth of  Catharanthus roseus , as well as on the possibility of   inducing  mutations , which  can resist high salinity or  have wider  landscape  value .
  2. Selecting a new strain of Catharanthus roseus, with high alkaloid productivity.
  3. Using of isozymes techniques (peroxidase enzymes) to find out the genetic relationship among the original mother plant and the mutated plants.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

The experiments were carried out in the Flowers and Ornamental Plants Research Gardens, Department of the Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture and Landscape Gardening, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University during 2013 – 2015.

 

Materials

Plant materials

Local cultivar of Madagascar periwinkle or rosy periwinkle (Catharanthus  roseus (L.) G.Don was used in this study, with purple flowers and cross-pollination.  Seeds were obtained from the Flowers and Ornamental Plants Research Gardens of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria.

 

Gamma radiation source

Gamma - rays doses applied in this study were generated from the Cobalt 60 Source, in Gamma – Cell installed in the Irradiation Laboratory at Middle East Regional Radio-Isotope Center for Arab Countries, El-Dokky, and Cairo, Egypt.

 

Methods

a. Experimental design

The effects of the two factors ( irradiation and salinity ) on the M1 - plants were tested in  field. The layout of  the experiment was designed as factorial layout in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) (Gomez and Gomez, 1984) which contained 5 radiation treatments , i.e. control (0) , 5, 10, 15 and 20 kr.from  gamma rays   and 3 salinity levels of the irrigation water (0,100 and 150 mM NaCl).  One hundred and fifty seeds of Catharanthus  roseus were used for every  treatment from Gamma rays, One hundred and fifty seeds for every  salinity treatment within each gamma rays treatment.

 

b. Preparing of seeds

Lot of well developed pure seeds  from healthy and abundantly fruitful plants of  Madagascar periwinkle or rosy periwinkle (Catharanthus  roseus L.) Local cultivar were collected. The total amount of seeds prepared for gamma ray treatments  was divided into five equal portions; the first portion for control, while the  other four portions of seeds were, paged equally in four paper bags before exposure to radiation.

 

c. Gamma radiation practices

On the 18 th and 26 th of March 2013 and 2014 in the first and second seasons; respectively, the dry seeds of Catharanthus  roseus L.were exposed to four different doses of gamma rays as 5, 10, 15 and 20 kr from Co-60.

 

d. Soil analyses

Physical and chemical analyses of the used soil were carried out according to the standard methods outlined by Page et al. (1982) and are listed in Table (1).

 

Table (1). Some Physical and chemical characteristics of the used soil during 2013 and 2014.

Parameters

Value

Chemical properties

Physical properties

Soluble cations (1:2)

(cmol/kg soil)

Soil texture

Sandy loam

Na+

20.70

Sand %

75

K+

0.50

Silt  %

8

Ca++

7.40

Clay %

17

Mg++

10.80

Available K+

8.76

Chemical properties

 

Soluble anions (1:2)

(cmol/kg soil)

pH ( 1 : 1)

7.82

CO3--

-

E.C. (dS/m)

3.45

HCO3--

3.60

Cl-

21.00

SO4--

14.80

 

The experimental treatments consisted of two salinity levels of the irrigation water (100 and 150 mM NaCl) in addition to control (0.0 mM), salinity levels were obtained by addition of appropriate amount of dry NaCl to water. The salinity levels were equivalent to an electrical conductivity of 0.46, 10.9 and 15.9 dSm-1, respectively using a portable EC meter instrument. To avoid an osmotic shock for seedling emergence; the salinized water was used after 45 days of sowing (Gorham and Wyn Jones, 1993).

 

To prepare the stock  solution, a commercial sea salt (sodium chloride) without  purification (contents: NaCl  98.5% , Humidity 0.3% and  KIO3 30-70 ppm) produced by  Egyptian salt and mineral company (EMISAL) was dissolved in tap water (0.46 dS/m) at (5.85 g salt per liter =100 mM and 8.775 g salt per liter =150 mM).One month later, complete fertilizer 19-19-19 was top dressed at the rate of 1/2 g /l and this addition was repeated every two weeks.

The plants were irrigated 3 times weekly in summer with 320 ml  per pot until the end of the experiment.

 

Cultural aspects

a. M1 - Generation

Gamma- rays treated and non - treated  seeds were sown  on March 20,  2013  in  the first season and on March 27,2014 in  the second one. The seeds of each treatment were sown in three trays (150 seeds) filled with a mixture of equal parts of sand  and clay(1/1).The trays were placed in partial shade according to the factorial experimental  layout  of the Randomized Complete Block Design and watered daily. On May 3 , 2013 and April  22, 2014 in both seasons , the trays were gradually transferred from shade to open place (sunny place)  for one week on May 10, 2013 and  April 29, 2014 in the first and second seasons, respectively. Two seedlings were transplanted into 30 cm diameter plastic pot containing   sandy loam soil and reached a height of about ten cm. The pots were arranged in the three replicates according to the Randomized Complete Block Design with different numbers of pots in each treatment according to the number of the survived seedlings. 

 

b. M2 - Generation

For growing the M2- generation in both seasons ,  seeds were  collected from  each  treatment on  March 20, 2014 and March 23, 2015 in the first and second seasons, respectively, and sown in three trays( 100 seeds for each treatment). The trays contained a soil mixture of   1 sand: 1 clay by volume. The trays were placed in partial shade according to the factorial experimental layout of Randomized Completely Block Design with 3 replicates (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).The trays were watered daily.  On April 24 , 2014 and April 28, 2015 in the first and second seasons ; respectively , the trays were gradually transferred from shade to sunny place along one week . On April 24, 2014 and April 8, 2015 during the first and second seasons; respectively, every two M2- seedlings were transplanted into a plastic pot of 30 cm diameter, containing   sandy loam soil and reached a height of about ten cm.  The pots were arranged according to the experimental design mentioned before.

 

Experimental Data

The following parameters were recorded in both M1 - and M2-generations of the two successive experimental seasons.

 

  1. Morphological characteristics, such as habit of growth, leaf size, form and colour, stem colour and flower structure and colour.
  2. Leaf proline content (according to Bates et al. 1973).
  3. Leaf  alkaloids,  vindolen and  catharanthine contents  ( after Luo et al., 2005)
  4. Leaf  total carbohydrates content

     Total leaf carbohydrates content was determined colorimetricaly as reported by Loomis and Shull (1937) and Dubios et al.,(l956).

  1. Variations and Mutations.

 All plants of the different treatments in both M1 and M2 experiments were examined daily to search for the variation. Changes  in the vegetative or flowering growth were recorded. These changes included :

a)  Habit of growth.

b)  Leaf colour and form.

c)  Flower colour and form.

 

6 .Peroxidase isozyme electrophoresis

The gamma rays and salinity treatments caused variation in the flowers form and tolerance   to salinity compared with the control. Leaves were used for the isozymes techniques from the control and the mutated twelve plants. The peroxidase isozymes patterns were examined after the method described by Sabrah and El- Metainy (1985).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

  1. Effect of gamma radiation and salinity on the morphological characteristics

Some  variations in seed germination percentage ,plant height, internode length, stem diameter , number of branches, number of leaves, leaf area, specific leaf weight, total leaf chlorophyll content  (a,b and a+b), total carotene, fresh and dry weights of the plants, flowering date ,number of flowers per plant, flowering  period, flower length and diameter, pollen viability, survival, fresh and dry weights of the roots, were recorded as a result of different  treatments

 

  1. Effect of the gamma  radiation  and salinity on  the  leaf proline content

The analysis of variance  showed that the effects of the gamma radiation, salinity   treatments  and  interaction  between them  were  highly  significant  on the leaf  proline content  in the M1 and M2 -generations of  the second season.

Data on the effect of gamma radiation  and salinity treatments on  the leaf proline content   of the M1 and M2 - generations of  the second season are listed in Table  2.

 

In the M1 -generation there were highly significant differences among gamma rays treatments. The highest average was at the 20 kr treatment (0.4052 g/100g) and the lowest one was at 0 kr (0.2296 g/100g).By the salinity treatments, there were also highly significant differences. The highest average was at the 150 mM (0.4497 g/100g) and the lowest one was at 100 mM (0.2376 g/100g). The interaction was   also highly significant. The 20 kr with 100 mM had the highest proline content (0.7690 g/100g). The lowest one was at the treatment of 20 kr with 0 mM (0.0006 g/100g) (Table 2).

 

In the M2 – generation, there were highly significant difference among the gamma rays treatments. The highest average by  the  gamma rays  was at the 20 kr treatment (0.9993 g/100g)  and  the lowest average was  at 5 kr (0.3579 g/100g).The salinity treatments  caused  highly significant differences. The highest average was at the 150 mM (1.0788 g/100g) and the lowest average was at 0 mM (control) treatment (0.3789 g/100g). The interaction was also highly significant. The 20 kr with 150 mM treatment had the highest proline content(1.4700 g/100g). The lowest average was at the treatment of 5 kr with 100 mM (0.1818 g/100g).

 

The results of gamma rays were similar to those reported by Desai and Rao (2014) on  Cajanus cajan . The results of the salinity treatments were similar to those reported by Zidan and Alzahrani (1994) on Ocimum basilicum L. and Heidari  and Sarani (2012)  on  Matricaria chamomilla.

 

Generally, the treatments  of  gamma rays  and salinity caused some increases in proline content in the M1 and M2 generation,  which is harmony with the results of  Nikam et al.(2015) on Saccharum officinarum L. which  can be used for the production of mutants  which have  the ability for environmental stress tolerance, Desai  and  Rao(2014).

 

The  results of this work revealed that  the dose  of 20 kr significantly   increased the amount of leaf proline  in the irradiated plants  comparing  with  the control in  the  M1- and M2 – generations  of the second seasaon. Higher  level  of proline content   in leaves may  be due to irradition  at  20 kr stimulated  the experession of genes encoding  enzymes of proline synthesis  such  as  pyrroline -5- carboxylate.  Also, irradiation decreased enzymes of proline    oxidative such as proline dehydrogenase. This explanation is similar to the opinion mentioned by Amini and Ehasapour (2005).

 

The  results of the  M2  -generation during   the second  season  declared that the  doses  of 5,10 and 15 kr significantly reduced  the amount of leaf  proline  in  irradiated  plants  as compared to  the  control.This  reduction in leaf  proline  content could be  attributed to the  inhibition  effect  of gamma-rays  doses    mentioned  before on  the  expression  of genes encoding enzymes of proline synthesis  and /or  enhancing the activity of enzymes of  proline   oxidative. This declaration is nearly   similar to that reported by Amini and Ehasapour (2005).

 

Table  (2). Average values of the leaf proline content of  Catharanthus    roseus, L.  as affected by gamma radiation   (kr) and  salinity levels  (mM) treatments in the M1 – and M2  generations of the second season.1).

 

Average  proline content (g/100g)

Gamma Rays (Kr)

2nd season - M1

Average

Gam.

2nd season- M2

Average

Gam.

Salinity Levels (mM)

Salinity Levels (mM)

0

100

150

0

100

150

0.0

0.3810 c

0.1980 d

0.1098 de

0.2296 b

0.4190 de

0.8310 c

1.4200 a

0.8900 b

5.0

0.3620 c

0.1740 de

0.5520 b

0.3626 ab

0.3830 de

0.1818 f

0.5090 d

0.3579 e

10.0

0.3590 c

0.0004 e

0.7030 a

0.3541 ab

0.3690 e

0.2140 f

0.8750 c

0.4860 d

15.0

0.4430 bc

0.0470 e

0.4380 bc

0.3093 b

0.3849 de

0.8650 c

1.1200 b

0.7899 c

20.0

0.0006 e

0.7690 a

0.4460 bc

0.4052 a

0.3390 ef

1.1890 b

1.4700 a

0.9993 a

Average  Sal.

0.3091 b

0.2376 c

0.4497 a

 

0.3789 c

0.6561 b

1.0788 a

 

L.S.D.0.05 for A

0.082

 

0.077

 

 

 

L.S.D.0.05 for B

0.064

 

0.060

L.S.D.0.05 for AB

0.143

 

0.134

1)Values marked with the same alphabetical letters, within comparable group of  means, do not differ   significantly, using

L.S.D. at 0.05 level of probability.

 

It is  clear that the  salinity  treatments of  100 and 150mM significantly   increased  the  amount of  leaf proline  as compared  with  the control. It  has  been  established that the plants accumulate   a variety   of  osmoregulator   soluts  including proline as an  adaptive mechanism  to environmental stress and salinity (Aspinall  and Paley,1981). The use of  proline as  osmoregulator  to  overcame the  bad effects of salinity, which  is  similar  to the  effect of seawater on plant growth has been  reported  by  Lin and Kao(1996). Increase in proline content with  increasing  stress   is one of the defense mechanisms   which  is  used  by stressed   plants to  reduce cell osmotic  potential which  resulted  in increasing  cell water  uptake  with concomitant increases  in  cell  turgidity and  activity (Khalil and El- Noemani,2012). Stressed plants diminish osmotic potential by accumulating free amino acids,ions,proline,soluble protein and  carbohydtaye (Salama et al.,1994). These osmolytesmight increase the osmotic pressure of cytoplasm and enhance water flow into the different plant organs and tissues.

 

3. Effect of radiation   and salinity on  the leaf alkaloids

3a.Effect of gamma   radiation  and salinity on  the leaf vindolen content

The analysis of variance showed that the effect of the gamma radiation alone and the interaction between gamma radiation and salinity were not significant, but the effect of salinity treatments on the leaf vindolen content was significant in the M1-generation.

 

Data on the effects of gamma radiation and salinity treatments on the   leaf vindolen content of the M1 and M2 –generations in second season are listed in Table 3a.

 

In the M2-generation, the effects of the gamma radiation and that of theinteraction between gamma radiation and salinity    were highly significant but   the effect of the salinity treatments was only significant.

 

Table 3a presents the mean values of the leaf vindolen content of the different treatments. In the M1-generation, there were no significant differences between gamma rays treatments. The highest average between the  gamma rays  was at the 20 kr treatment (1.37 mg/g) and  the lowest one was  at 0 kr (control) (1.27 mg/g).The effect of the  salinity treatments was significant. The highest average between the   treatments salinity was   at the control treatment (1.66 mg/g) and the lowest one was at 100 mM (0.97 mg/g). The 20kr with 0 mM treatment had the highest leaf vindolen content (2.12 mg/g). The lowest averages were at the treatment of 20 kr with 100 mM (0.86 mg/g).

 

In the M2- generation, there were highly significant differences among the gamma rays treatments. The highest average was at the 20 kr treatment (3.35 mg/g) and the lowest one was at 10 kr (2.29 mg/g).The effects of the salinity treatments were significant. The highest average was at the 150 mM (2.94 mg/g) and the lowest one was at 0 mM (control) treatment (2.41 mg/g). The 20 kr with 150 mM treatment had the highest leaf vindolen content (4.20 mg/g). The lowest average was at the treatment of 15 kr with 0 mM (1.65 mg/g) (Table 3a).

 

The results of gamma rays were similar to those reported by Abdel-Hady et al.(2008)  on Atropa belladonna and Shaimaa et al.(2013)on  Brassica rapa at gamma rays.

 

Generally, the treatments of salinity caused some increases in leaf vindolen content in the M2- generation,  which in harmony with the results of  Ali (1991) on Daturaand Heidari  and Sarani (2012) on  Matricaria  chamomilla.

Also  the effect of gamma -rays and salinity on the  vindolen   was  similar to  the result  reported by Shaimaa et al.(2013)on Brassica rapa.

 

Accumulation of alkaloids was considered as an adaptation to the imposed salinity stress because they have an osmoregulatory role (Elhaak and Wegmann, 1997).

 

William et al (1998) reported thatthe increase in the alkaloids content as the influence of NaCl is a combination of an osmotic effect and a specific ion effect. He added that the increase of alkaloids in response to salinity may be due to its role in the plant protection against the salt stress effects.

 

 

           Table (3a). Average values of the vindolen content of Catharanthus    roseus, L.  as affected by gamma radiation (kr) and  salinity levels (mM) treatments   in the M1 – M2  generation  of  second  season.1).

 

Average  vindolen content (mg/g)

Gamma Rays (Kr)

M1 -2nd season

Average Gam.

M2 -2nd season

Average  Gam.

Salinity Levels (mM)

Salinity Levels (mM)

0

100

150

0

100

150

0.0

1.51

1.08

1.22

1.27

2.66 bc

2.20 bc

2.89 b

2.58 b

5.0

1.82

1.06

1.11

1.33

2.95 b

2.33 bc

1.91 c

2.39 b

10.0

1.21

0.89

1.82

1.31

2.88 b

1.90 c

2.10 c

2.29 b

15.0

1.63

0.95

1.43

1.34

1.65 c

3.50 ab

3.62 ab

2.92 ab

20.0

2.12

0.86

1.12

1.37

1.94 c

3.91 a

4.20 a

3.35 a

Average  Sal.

1.66 a

0.97 b

1.34 ab

 

2.41 b

2.76 a

2.94 a

 

L.S.D.0.05 for A

N.S.

 

0.445

 

L.S.D.0.05 for B

0.485

 

0.345

 

L.S.D.0.05 for AB

N.S.

 

0.771

 

1)Values marked with the same alphabetical letters, within comparable group of  means, do not differ   significantly, using

 L.S.D. at 0.05 level of  probability.

 

 

3b.Effect of the gamma radiation and salinity on the leaf catharanthine content

 

The analysis of variance   showed that the effects of the gamma radiation, salinity treatments and the interaction between them   on the leaf catharnthine content were highly significant in the M1-generation in the second season.

 

Data on the effect of gamma radiation and salinity treatments on the leaf catharnthine content of the M1 and M2-generations   of the second season are listed in Table (3b).

 

In the M2-generations ,the effect of the gamma radiation was not  significant,but that of the  salinity  treatment was significant,  while  the   interaction  between  them was highly  significant.

 

Table 4   presents the mean values of the leaf catharnthine content   of the different treatments. In the M1-generation, there were highly significant differences among the gamma rays treatments. The highest average was at the 10kr treatment (0.413 mg/g) and the lowest one was at 15 kr (0.104 mg/g).The effects of the salinity treatments were highly significant. The highest average was  at the control treatment (0.372 mg/g) and  the lowest one was  at 100 mM (0.079 mg/g). The 10 kr with 150 mM had the highest leaf catharnthine content (0.890 mg/g). The lowest average was at the treatment of 20 kr with 100 mM (0.002 mg/g).

 

In the M2- generation, there were no significant differences among the gamma rays treatments. The highest average between the gamma rays was at the 15 kr treatment (0.186 mg/g) and the lowest one was at 10 kr (0.116 mg/g).The effects of the salinity treatments were significant. The highest average was at the 100 mM (0.177 mg/g) and the lowest one was at 0 mM (control) treatment (0.128 mg/g). The 0 kr with 100 mM treatment had the highest leaf catharnthine content (0.316 mg/g), while the lowest averages  was at the treatment  of  10 kr with 150 mM (0.080 mg/g).

 

The results of this work indicated that the gamma doses of 5 and 10kr significantly increased the leaf catharnathine content compared with the control during the M1-generation of the second season. It was also noticed that the dose of 20kr significantly increased the leaf vindolen content as compared   with the control during the M2-generation of the second season. This means that radiation supported accumulation of alkaloids in the irradiated plants. The respone of plants against radiation  induced reproductive and metabolic disorder may  be  due to  the accumulation of several bioactive constituents like  alkaloids (Padhya,1986),which may act through different  mechanisms such as inhibition  of lipid peroxidation (Goel et al. 2004).

 


Alkaloids are end products for the reaction of toxic components in plants and they are harmless for plants (Hossien, 1987). The radiation may stimulate thesereaction which resulted in accumulation of alkaloids in the irradiated plants.

 

Regarding the salinity treatments, it was noticed that the treatment of 10mM in the M2-generation   of the second season significantly reduced the amounts of leaf catharnathine and vindolen compared with the control. It  is  known that under stress  condiation  plants generally  shift a major  protion  of their metabolic  activies towards secondary  metabolite synthesis, so an increase  in alkaloid contents was  expected (Ali,1991;Moons et al. 1997;Wu et al.,2004;Pandey et al., 2007 and Shaimaa et al. ,2013).

 

But  in the case of the treatment of 100mM during  the M1-generation  the decrease in alkaloids was  recorded and it was unexpected.During  the M2-generation   of the  second season,it was  clear  that the treatment of 10mM significantly  increased the amount of the catharnathine and both treatments of 100 and  150mM significantly increased the amount  of leaf vindolen  as compared with the control. It  has been mentioned before  that under stress condition as salinity stress  plants generally  shift a mojor  protion of their metabolic activeties  towards  secondary metabolite  synthesis, as alkaloids (Ali,1991;Moons  et al., 1997;Wu et al.,2004;Pandey et al., 2007 and Shaimaa et al. ,2013). A biotic stresses as salinity stress may result in an increase in the level of endogenous methyl jasmonate, which can stimulate the activity of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of alkaloids leading to enhanced alkaloids accumulation (Moons   et al., 1997).

 

   Table (3b). Average values of the leaf catharnthine content of Catharanthus roseus, L. as affected by gamma radiation (kr) and salinity levels (mM) treatments in the M1 – M2 generation of second season.1).

 

Average  leaf catharnthine content (mg/g)

Gamma Rays (Kr)

M1 -2nd season

Average Gam.

M2 -2nd season

Average Gam.

Salinity Levels (mM)

Salinity Levels (mM)

0

100

150

0

100

150

0.0

0.326 cd

0.093 e

0.065 e

0.161 bc

0.050 c

0.316 a

0.190 b

0.183

5.0

0.603 b

0.210 de

0.300 d

0.371 a

0.051c

0.130 bc

0.270 ab

0.150

10.0

0.293 d

0.056 e

0.890 a

0.413 a

0.180 b

0.089 c

0.080 c

0.116

15.0

0.183 de

0.036 e

0.093 e

0.104 c

0.210 b

0.170 bc

0.180 b

0.186

20.0

0.453 c

0.002 e

0.103 e

0.186 bc

0.150 bc

0.190 b

0.091 c

0.143

Average Sal.

0.372 a

0.079 b

0.290 a

 

0.128 b

0.177 a

0.162 ab

 

L.S.D.0.05 for A

0.080

 

N.S.

 

 

 

L.S.D.0.05 for B

0.062

 

0.040

L.S.D.0.05 for AB

0.139

 

0.090

1) Values marked with the same alphabetical letters, within comparable group of  means, do not differ   significantly, using

 L.S.D. at 0.05   level of  probability

 

4. Effect of the gamma radiation and salinity on the total carbohydrate content

The analysis of variance showed  that the effects of the gamma radiation, salinity and  the interaction  between them  on the total carbohydrate   content was not significant in the M1-generation in  the second season. In the M2, the effects of the gamma radiation and salinity were significant but the interaction between them was not significant. Table 4 presents the mean values of the total carbohydrate   content of the different treatments in M1-and M2 of the second season. In the M1-generation, there were no significant differences among the gamma rays treatments. The highest average was at the 0 kr (control) treatment (5.39 %) and the lowest one was at 20 kr (4.68 %).The effects of the salinity treatments were also not significant. The highest average between the  salinity  was  at 150 mM (5.38 %) and  the lowest one was  at 0 mM (control) treatment  (4.90 %) and  the interaction  between radiation  and  salinity  was  not significant. The 10 kr with 150 mM had the highest total carbohydrate content (6.72 %) and the lowest average was at the treatment of 10 kr with 0 mM (4.04 %) .In the M2- generation, there was significant difference among the gamma rays treatments. The highest average was at the 15 kr treatment (8.96 %) and the lowest one was at 5 kr (6.50 %).The effects of the salinity treatments were significant. The highest average was at the 100 mM (8.50 %) and the lowest one was at 0 mM (control) treatment (7.10 %). The 15kr with 100 mM and 15 kr with 150 mM treatment   had the highest total carbohydrate content( 9.50 %). The lowest average  was  at the treatment  of  5 kr with  0 mM (4.70 %).These results were similar to those reported by Rashad (1995) on Tagest erecta,  El-Sharnouby et al. (1997) on  Hibiscus sabdariffia and Farid et al. (1999)  on  the sweet marjoram. The results of the other workers are not in harmony Kandeel et al. (1991) reported on Ocmium basilicum that the high gamma dose of  12000 r caused a slight decrease in comparison with the control.These results were similar to those reported by Zidan and Alzahrani (1994) on Ocmium basilicum.

 

The obtained results of salinity   treatments during the M2-generation    of the  second season indicated that the  treatments of 100 and 150mM increased the amount of carbohydrate contents and  the increase was  significant at the treatment of 100mM compared  with the control. Many plants, which are stressed ,by Na Cl  salinity, accumulated starch and  soluble carbohydrates (Greenway and Munns,1980 and Rathert,1984). This   accumulation has  been attributed to impaired  carbohydrate utilization (Munns and Termaat,1986). Dhanapackiam and Ityas (2010) reported that the soluble and total carbohydrates content in leaves were higher in salt stress plants compared with the control. This is strong evidence that photosynthesis is the main source of accumulating carbohydrates under water stress.  The accumulation  of organic  solutes(soluble and  insoluble carbohydrates) might play  an important role in increasing  the  internal osmotic pressure ( Zidan  and Alzahrani,(1994). This has been widely regarded as response to salinity stress condition. Munns (1993) reported that the concentration of sugars and reserve polysaccharides always rise after plants are exposed to salinity in both growing and fully expanded tissues. This is consistent with  a blockage in utilization of  sugars in the growing tissues and a subsequent build-up in the rest of the plant.


     Table  (4). Average   values of the total carbohydrates content of Catharanthus roseus, L.as affected by gamma radiation (kr) and salinity levels (mM) treatments in the M1 – M2 generation of second season.1).

 

Average  total carbohydrates  content (%)

Gamma Rays(Kr)

M1 -2nd season

Average Gam.

M2 -2nd season

Average Gam.

Salinity Levels (mM)

Salinity Levels (mM)

0

100

150

0

100

150

0.0

6.53

4.67

4.99

5.39

7.79

7.99

7.40

7.73 ab

5.0

4.79

5.17

5.59

5.18

4.70

7.93

6.88

6.50 b

10.0

4.04

5.13

6.72

5.29

7.60

8.60

7.99

8.06 a

15.0

4.22

4.70

5.47

4.79

7.88

9.50

9.50

8.96 a

20.0

4.92

5.00

4.12

4.68

7.54

8.50

8.20

8.08 a

Average  Sal.

4.90

4.93

5.38

 

7.10 b

8.50 a

7.99 ab

 

L.S.D.0.05 for A

N.S.

 

1.48

 

L.S.D.0.05 for B

N.S.

 

1.15

L.S.D.0.05 for AB

N.S.

 

N.S.

1)Values marked with the same alphabetical letters, within comparable group of  means, do not differ   significantly, using

L.S.D. at 0.05 level of probability.

 

5. Effect of gamma rays and salinity on the induction of variations (Aberrations)(Mutations)

5.1.Growth habit changes

Some treatments caused changes in the habit of growth is some plants resulting in fascinated, dwarfed, creeping and conical forms. Changes in growth habit may be due to the effect  radiation on genetic factors controlling the  normal growth habit  of the plant.The dwarfed growth  can be  attributed to  the effect  of radiation on  the apical bud which inhibited its growth.It is a fact that most genetical  changes in  plants  result in from  chromosome  aberrations  rather  than single  gene change (Broertjes et al.,1976).

 

The dwarfed plant lost its ability to grow and was associated with inhibition of flowering. The observed effects in this dwarf plant could be separated as primary and secondary effects. The secondary effects are totally depending upon the primary effects (Donnini   et al.,1984).

The dwarfed growth in the M1-generation may be due to physiological  damage  resulted in  the alteration   from  normal  to  dwarf growth (Abd El-Maksoud  and El- Mahrouk , 1993 ).

 

The fascinated growth  occurred when a bud had been  injured or splitted  by  radiation,which  resulted  in  many  breaks (instead  of one break) to come from the  apical  point. This result is in agreement with that reported by Badr and Etman (1976) and Abdel-Maksoud  (1980).

 

5.2. Leaf changes (shape and colour)

All treatments caused a wdie range of leaf deformities during the M1-generation of the two seasons. Leaf abnormalities included dwarfing, prolonging, slanting, diminishing. Some leaves were linear, Lanceolate, oblong, elliptic, obovate and spatulate.Other leaves had oblique bases. Some leaves had obtuse, marginate and cuspidate tips. There were changed margins included dentate,undulate, sinuate, incised,lobed and deeply lobed margins. Some plants had curly leaves. Some leaves had the bell- shape. There were some leaves with two midribs. It was noticed in some leaves that the midrib divided the lamina into unequal parts.

 

The leaf abnormalities were found in the control plants,as well as in the other treatments. In general the frequency of the leaf form changes in the control was leass than that of any other treatment. Selfing was carried out in the plants which had the leaf form changes and the seeds of each plant were sown. The inheritance  of these changes were obvious in the M2- generation and there was a wide range of variation between the M2- plants.

 

In this experiment,variation in leaf size and  shape suggested  that more than one effect may be responsible for  the modified leaf  patterns. One  possible  explanation  would  be the alteration  in the  ontogeny  of leaf tissues through the selective destruction of 1 or more cell layer in the shoot  meristem(Skirvin and Janick,1977 and Abdel-Maksoud,1980).Second explanation  can be given  through  genetic changes or chromosomal disturbances, as a result of  primary effect of radiation, which  may occurred and  caused a decrease in the leaf size   in irradiated  plants (Kaicher and Swarup,1972 and Evans,1984). Third  possibility  is  that  the cell number per  unit area  and the tength of cells may be altered in the   leaf  area of  irradiated  plants  as a result of the primary  effect of  radiation. From the   number of cells per unit  leaf area and the cell length it could be concluded that  broader leaves  had a decreased  number of cells  and /or length of  cells.

 

Some leaf changes, especially those  with distorted  patterns of development,may be  resulted  in  as  induced  polyplody which  was also reported  by love(1966). Also, these changes could be referred  to the layer  rearrangements  as a result of irradiation effect (Kaicher and Swarup,1978 and  Abdel-Maksoud,1980 and 1988). These results were in agreement with those reported by Sorour (2011) on  Farfugium  japonicum  and Minisi et al.(2013) on   Moluccella  laevis at the effect of gamma  and Khayamim et al. (2014) on sugar beet at the effect of  salinity.

 

The leaf variegation which appeared in the M2-generation could be attributed   to one  of the  following  reasons:

1)  The epidermal layer lacked chlorophyll  and the internal tissues also  showed  lack of chlorophyll - because epidermal cells  have  displaced  inner  cells  in particular  regions , the  result was  creamy green colour.This explanation  is supported by  those mentioned by Watts(1980),Irvine(1984) and Abdel-Maksoud  (1988),who have  stated  that when  the plant is  irradiated,the cell layer LI   is easily  destroyed and  this  urges the epidermis or  the tissue beneath it to  substitute the cell layer L II  and  then the variegation type appears.

 

2)  The variegation  may be  caused by gene  and / or  plastid  changes as a  results  of the irradiation (Borner et al.,1976; Walbot and Thompson,1982 and Preil,1985).

 

Regarding the M2-generation dwarfed albino plant,  it could be concluded that this  plant  suffered from chlorophyll deficiency which might be due to chromosomal   breaks induced by the mutagen (Abd El-Maksoud  and El-Mahrouk, 1992).

 

5.3. Stem   colour  changes

During the M1- generation   of the first season, one changed plant was found at the combined treatment of 5kr+100mM   NaCl.  The phenotypic change was restricted in the stem and branches colour. The base of the stem was green, while the rest of the stem had a light purple colour, also,all branches of the plant had a light purple colour.The  exact mechanism of  the induction of the light purple and  green colours cannot be explained with certainly. Both  gene and  chromosomal structural  change has been responsible for  the  induction of this  light purple  on the stem of irradiated Catharanthus   roseus  (L) G. Don  plant(Sparrow,1961 and  Gupta and Shukla,1971).

 

It is suggested   that  the appearance of light purple may be due to one or more of the following  suggestions:

1. During the biosenthesis of purple pigments, radiation may decrease the methylation of one or more   hydroxyl groups by affecting the gene controlling this  process,which consequently decreased the purple colour(Wagner,1975).

  1. The co-pigmentation may be changed as a result of radiation effect and this may dilute the purple colour and changed it to light purple (De Vries et al., 1974 and   Chaleff and Torrey,1981).
  2. The radiation may affect one of the genes which determine  the s quantity of pigments responsible for  the purple colour which consequently decreased the  quantity   of the  whole pigments (Wagner,1975).This  came to  the agreement with that  reported  by Adachi and Katayama(1970).

 

The  role  of salinity  in the production of the light  purple  colour cannot  be neglected,where it may be decreased the methylation of  hydroxyl groups and /or  the degree of co-pigmentation, consequently the appearance of light  purple on the stem and branches. According toAdachi and Katayama(1970),the  pigment of betacyanin causes the  purple in  plant. Radiation may reduce the  biosenthesis of betacyanin which resulted in appearance of the  light purple.

 

Regarding the appearance of green colour on the base of plant which  subjected to the treatment of 5kr+100mM. Scott-Moncrieff (1936) reported that there are  intensifying and diluting genes whose action is not effective over the  whole, but is restricted to certain areas. It can be  suggested that  radiation  depressed  or  inhibited the action  of the genes which control the purple colour of the stem or determine  the extension of purple  colour all over  the  stem. So,the purple colour  withdraw  from  the base of  stem while the green colour spread over the stem base.

 

5.4. Flower changes

5.4.1.Changes in the number and size of petals

The different treatments caused different changes in the number and size of petals. The normal corolla of Catharanthus   roseus,(L.) G. Don consists of separated and equall five petals. The changes in petal numbers were classified into four types:

 

Type1.The corolla contained two separated petals and this type was found at the treatments of 5kr+0mM and 10kr+100mM during the M1- generation    of the first season.

 

Type2. The crolla contained three separated petals and this type was found at the treatments of 15kr+0mM, 5kr+100mM and 20kr+100mM during the M1- generation of the first season.

 

Type3.The corolla contained four separated petals (crucifer form). This type was found during theM1- generation of the first season at the treatments of 5kr+100mM, 10kr+100mM and 15kr+100mM and in the second season at  the treatment of 20kr+150mM.Also,this type was  found during the M2- generation of the first season at the treatments of 5kr+0mM,10kr+0mM,15kr+0mM and 20kr+0mM.

 

Type4.The corolla contained six separated petals. This type was found during  the M2- generation of  the first season at the treatments of 5kr+0mM, 10kr+0mM,15kr+0mM and 20kr+0mM.There was one flower with  six petals one  of  them was very small at the treatment of 5kr+0mM.Also, there was one  flower with six petals,but one of them  was above other petal and this from was detected  at the  treatment of 10kr+0mM.It was found during the M2- of the second season some flowers with six separated petals at the treatments of  5kr+100mM,10kr+100mM,15kr+100mM and 5kr+150mM. one flower at the treatment of 15kr+100mM and other one at that of 5kr+150mM had unqual petals.

 

The flower is a modified stem   and the floral whorls are   modified leaves and these whorls are appendages similar to the normal leaves in its initiation. Therefore, petal deformities can be attributed to the effect of radiation on flower bud during its initiation. The changes in  the number of petals can be postulated that these changes are a result of  chromosomal deletion  , or changes of  the  factors govering  the normal form or structure , as well as  according  to  the effect of radiation on  the  ontogeny  of flower   organ tissues through the selective  destruction  of one or more  cell   layer in the apical floral meristem(Abd El -Maksoud , 1980 and 1988).

 

Bidwell(1979) reported  that the initiation and  development of flower depends upon the  balance of hormones  or growth factors.Regarding the type  of six petals, it is   probably to assume that the gamma- rays had stimulation  effect on the initiation and  development of petals from the  meristematic  apex,since gamma doses may affect the balace of growth hormones which  in turn may result in an increase in  the number of petals.

 

The  reduction in the number of petals(two,three and four petals) could be attributed to the damage effect of  gamma-rays and /or salinity on the primordia of petals or on the  cells in  the  shoot  growing point,and were later activated  and become  involved in flowering (Bidwell,1979).

The flowers with changes in the number of petals were selfed. The type 1(two petals) and type 2(three petals) did not form seeds. The types 3 and 4 (four and six petals; respectively) formed seeds and their plants produced normal flowers.

 

5.4.2. Changes in flower colour

Four types of flower colour changes were observed in the treated Catharanthus  roseus,(L.) G.Don plants during theM1- M2- generations of both seasons (pale(light)purple,white,variegated and striped flowers).

The induced changes at the treatments of 5 kr + 0 mM,10 kr + 0 mM,15 kr + 0 mM and 20 kr + 0 mM  were:

  1. Pale purple (5 kr + 0mM, 10 kr + 0 mM and 15 kr + 0 mM),
  2. Purple variegated with white (15 kr + 0 mM),
  3. Purple striped with (15 kr + 0 mM).

 

 

 

These flower colour changes appeared through the M1- generation of both seasons.

 

Three types of induced flower colour changes were recognised at different   treatments. 

  1. White flowers (5 kr + 100 mM and 10 kr + 100 mM),
  2. Pale (light) purple flowers (5 kr + 100 mM,10 kr +100 mM,15 kr +100 mM and 20 kr + 100 mM ),
  3. Variegated flowers (5 kr + 100 mM, 10 kr + 100 mM, 15 kr + 100 mM and 20 kr +100 mM)

 

In the M2- generation of the second season,there was  a new of variegated at the treatment of 15kr+0mM.The flowers were purple variegated with  yellow colour and the  yellow areas were at the margins of four petals, while on the  fifth petal the yellow colour was extended  to the flower centre.

 

In order to give a general interpretation for the appearance of the pale(light)purple flowers,it should be  outlined that:

  1. Adachi and Katayama (1970)mentioned that betacyanin pigment causes the purple colour.
  2. Glycosides of the  betacyanins and their  co-pigmentation  with several other substences are responsible for innumerable variation in the   purple colours(Asen et al., 1972 and De Vries et al. ,1974).Glycosides type and propably the  dgree  of methylation are each determined  by simple gene (Wagner, 1975).The  methylation  of one or more hydroxyl groups  will increase the colour(Wagner,1975).
  3. The different combinations of the pigments are principally responsible for variation in flower colour (De vries   et al.,1974 and Chaleff and Torrey,1981).
  4. The presence of the pigment may be  controlled  by  a  single gene, while the quantitative effect of genes in pigment production refers to the effect  of  multigenes responsible for the amount of pigment in the  floral parts(Wagner,1975).

 

Accordingly it is suggested that the appearance of light purple flowers  in  Catharanthus roseus,(L.)G.Don plants may be due to one or more of the following suggestions:

 i.    During the biosenthesis of betacyanin,radiation may decrease the  methylation  of one or more hydroxyl groups by affecting the gene controlling, this  process, consequently decreased the purple colour.

  1. The co-pigmentation may be changed as a result of radiation and /or salinity effects and this may dilute the purple colour and changed it to light purple.
  2. The radiation may affect one or more of the genes which determine the quantity of purple pigments which consequently decreased the quantity of the whole pigments. This came to agreement with what was reported by Adachi and Katayama (1970).

 

These results were in agreement with those reported by Sorour (2011)on Ligularia japonica,  Minisi et al.(2013) on   Moluccella  laevis and Khayamim et al. (2014) on sugar beet.

5.5.Mutated  plants

The gamma rays and salinity treatments caused branching, flower texture,form and colour  and salt tolerance mutations in twelve  plants  in theM1compared with the control as follows:

 

T0                      0 Kr Gama ray + 0 mM salinity (control).

T1                            5 Kr Gama ray + 0 mM salinity (petals texture).

T2                            10 Kr Gama ray + 0 mM salinity (flower form).

T3                            15 Kr Gama ray + 0 mM salinity (flower colour).

T4                            20 Kr Gama ray + 0 mM salinity (little branching).

T5                            0 Kr Gama ray +100 mM salinity (salt tolerate).

T6                            5 Kr Gama ray +100 mM salinity  (salt tolerate).

T7                            10 Kr Gama ray +100 mM salinity salt (tolerate).

T8                            15 Kr Gama ray +100 mM salinity (salt tolerate).

T9                            0 Kr Gama ray + 150 mM salinity  (salt tolerate).

T10                          5 Kr Gama ray +150 mM salinity   (salt tolerate).

T11                          10 Kr Gama ray + 150 mM salinity (salt tolerate).

T12                          15 Kr Gama ray + 150 mM salinity (salt tolerate).

 

The leaves of the control and mutated plants were used for the isozymes techniques and the separation of the peroxidase isozymes of the control plant and the twelve   mutants were carried out.

 

5.6.Peroxidase isozyme

It is important to notice that isozyme analysis using electrophoresis offers a very well define effective tool for the detection of genetic differences among individuals .This makes electrophoresis a useful tool for plant breeders (Arulsekar and Parfitt,1986) .The study of isozyme electrophoretic patterns can offer a rapid method for the identification of different genotypes without carring out field experiment, which saves time and money (Bailey, 1983). Moreover, the analysis of a protein can be reflected to its gene (Gottlieb, 1977).

 

The similarity values, (Table 5) showed that the control plants were more genetically distinct to the plants treated with 150 mM NaCl (similarity value equal to 50),while high similarity value (100) was found between  the control plants  and the plants treated with 5, 10 kr, 5kr+ 150 mM and 15 kr+ 150 mM NaCl (Table 5).

 


Table (5).Similarity value among the control and all mutants of Chatharanthus roseus, L. produced by gamma rays and salinity.

 

 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

100

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

100

100

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

66.6

66.6

66.6

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

80

80

80

88.8

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

66.6

66.6

66.6

75

66.6

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

80

80

80

88.8

100

66.6

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

66.6

66.6

66.6

100

88.8

75

88.8

100

 

 

 

 

 

8

66.6

66.6

66.6

50

66.6

75

66.6

50

100

 

 

 

 

9

50

50

50

57.1

50

75

50

57.1

85.7

100

 

 

 

10

100

100

100

66.6

80

66.6

80

66.6

66.6

50

100

 

 

11

88.8

88.8

88.8

75

66.6

75

66.6

75

66.6

57.1

88.8

100

 

12

100

100

100

66.6

66.6

66.6

66.6

66.6

66.6

50

100

88.8

100

 

The separation of  the peroxidase isozyme  of the control plant and  the  twelve mutants of Catharanthus  roseusis illustrated in Figure 1.These results were in agreement with those reported byJaleel et al. (2007)on Catharanthus roseus.

 

 

4    3     2    1        0       5     6     7      8    9   10     11     12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure (1).Zymogram of electrophoretic separation samples of peroxidase isozyme of the control and the twelve mutated plants of  Catharanthus roseus.L.

 

 

The electrophoretic banding patterns indicate different profiles among gamma rays doses and salinity concentrations. It can be noticed that a total number of seven loci control the production of peroxidase in the Catharanthus roseus. Five bands migrated toward the cathode (-) and designed as C1 to C5, while, two bands migrated toward the anod (+) in the electrophoresis field and were designed as A1 and A2.

The bands of the loci C1 and A1 were presented in all the treatments. Bands of the loci A1 differed in the intensity and homogeneity among treatments. This locus was presented by one homozygous  allele  in the treatments of 15, 20 kr, 150 mM NaCl and the treatment with 10 kr +150 mM saline water, while this locus showed heterozygous profile in all other treatments. The locus A2 disappeared from the samples treated with 15 kr, 100 mM, 150 mM NaCl and the treatments of 10 kr+150 mM NaCl.

The locus C5 was found only in the samples treated with 100 mM, 150 mM NaCl in low intensity and in the samples treated by 15 kr+ 100 mM in high intensity. The locus C4 was found only in the treatments of 15, 20 kr, 5 kr+ 100 mM and 10 kr + 100 mM NaCl with low intensity. On the other hand the locus C2 was absent in the 150 mM and 15 kr+ 100 mM NaCl treatments.

Phylogenetic tree classified the studied plants into three groups. The control plants (T0)and the treatments of T1, T2and T12 were classified in cluster Ι, plants  of T3, T4, T6and T7 were classified in the cluster ΙΙ and plants of T5, T8  and T9 were grouped in the cluster ΙΙΙ (Figure 2).

11

0

1

2

10

12

3

7

4

6

8

9

5

 

Claster 1

Claster 2 22 

 

Claster 3        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure  (2). Genetic relationship among the control and the twelve mutants Catharanthus roseus, L.based on peroxidase isozymes patterns and similarity   values.

 


Conclusion

 The obtainedresults indicated that different doses of gamma radiation cause some morphological variations in the vegetative and flowering growth of  Catharanthusroseus Linn. and  induced   salt – tolerant plants with high alkaloid content,  which can be grown in saline soils.It can be also concluded that peroxidase isozyme could act as a useful biochemical marker in Catharanthus  roseus,L.to study the genetic relationship between the mother plant and the induced mutations.

 

References
References

 

Abd El- Maksoud , B.A. (1980). Effect of gamma – irradiation onPortulaca grandiflora, Hook. M.Sc. Thesis in Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture.,Alex.Univ.Egypt.

Abd El- Maksoud, B.A. (1988). Effect of Different Media and Mutagenic  Treatments on  in vitro obtained Roses. Ph.D.Thesis  in Floriculture, Faculty of Agric.Alex . Univ .

Abd El- Maksoud , B.A. and E.M.El –Mahrouk (1992).Effect of ethyl methanesulfonate   on the growth and interior quality of Asparagus densiflorus  (Kunth) Jessop  cv. "SPRENGERI" . Egypt. J. Appl.   Sci., 7(10) : 116-132

Abd El-Maksoud, B.A. and E.M. El-Mahrouk (1993). Influence of ethyl  ethanesulfonate  on  Cardiospermum   halicacabum ,   L. I-  M1- generation   performance.  J.Agric.  Res. Tanta. Univ. 19 (1):191- 203.

Abdel-Hady, M.S., E.M.Okasha, S.S.A.Soliman and M.Talaat (2008). Effect of gamma radiation and gibberellic acid on germination and alkaloid production in Atropa belladonna l. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,  2(3): 401-405.

Adachi,T and Y.Katayama (1970).Studies of the  biochemical genetic of flwer colour and  their  application  to flower breeding. III constitution of flower pigments in the  geneus Portulaca.IV-Multiple forms of some enzymes in the genus Dianthus.Hort-Absts.,40:6747.

Ali, R.M. (1991). Changes in chemical composition of fruits of salinized Datura stramonium. Journal of Islamic Academy of Sci., 4(4): 289-292.

Amini,F. and A.A.Ehasapour (2005).Soluble proteins,proline,carbohydrates and Na+ /K+ changes in two tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum,Mill) cultivars under in vitro salt stress.Amer.J.Biochem. and Biotch.1(14):212-216.

Arulsekar, S.a and D.E.Parfitt ( 1986).Isozyme  analysis  procedures  for  stone  fruite , Almonds ,G rape . Walnut and Fig .Hortscience ,  21: 928- 933.

Asen,S.,R.N.Stewart and K.H.Norris (1972).Co-pigmentation of anthocyanins in plant tissues and its effect on colour.Phytochem,11:1139-1144.

Aspinall, D. and L.G. Paley (1981).Proline accumulation:Physiological aspects.pp205-241.In:The physiology and Biochemistry of Drought  Resistance in plants (ed)Paley,L.and D.Aspinall.Academic  press.

Badr,M.and M. Etman (1976).Effect of gamma – radiation on the vegetative growth and flower production in carnation (Dianthus caryopyllus,L.),Alex.J.Agric.Res.,24:577-584.

Bailey,D.C.(1983). Isozyme Variation and Plant Breeders Right .In :  Tanksley and Orton , T. J.(eds).  Isozymes in Plant Genetics and  Breeding. Part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam,  P.400- 425.

Bates, L.S., R.P.waldren and I.D.Teare (1973). Rapid determination of free proilne  for water-stress studies.  Plant and Soil, 39:205-207.

Bidwell,R.G.S.(1979).Plant Physiology.Second Edition, p.446-449 and 491-492. Machmillan Publishing  Co., Inc. New York.

Borner,T., B.Schumann and R.Hagemann (1976). Biochemical studies of a plastid ribosome  deficient mutant  of Hordeum vulgare.In "Genetics and Biogenesis  of Chloroplasts and  Mitochondria" Eds.Bandlow,W.;R.J.Schweyen;D.Y.Thomas;K Wolf and F.kaudewitz,p.41-48.Elsevier North Holland.

Broertjes,C., S.Roest and G.S.Bokelmann (1976).Mutation breeding of Chrysanthemum morifolium, Ram. usingin vivo and in vitro adventitious bud techniques.Euphytica,25:11-19.

Chaleff, R.S. and J.G.Torrey(1981).Variants and mutants. In "Genetics of Higher Plants,Application of Cell Culture"p.46.Cambridge University,Cambridge,London,New York.

De Vries,D.P., H.A.Van Keulen and J.W.De Bruyu (1974).Breeding Research on rose pigments.1.The  occurrence of flavonoids and s carotenoids in rose petals. Euphytica, 23:447-457.

Desai, A. S. and S. Rao(2014). Effect of gamma radiation on germination and physiological aspects of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan(L.) Millsp).seedlings. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 2(6):  47-52.

Dhanapackiam,S. and M.H.M. Ilyas (2010).Effect of salinity on chlorophyll and carbohydrate  contents of  Sesbania grandilflora seedlings. Indian Journal of Science  and  Technology, 3(1):64-66.

Donnini,B.,,T.Kawai and A. M.cke (1984).Spectrum of mutant characters utilized in  developing improved cultivars. In " Selection in Mutation Breeding ". proceedings of consultant Meeting Organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division  of Isotops and Radiation Applications  o Atomic Energy for Food and Agricultural Development, P.7-31.International Atomic Energy Agency , Vienna.

Dubois, M., K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A.Rebers and F. Smith (1956).   Calorimetric method for determination of sugars and related  substances. Anal. Chem, 28: 350-356.

Elhaak, M. A. and K.Wegmann (1997).Ecophysiological studies on Euphorbia paralias under soil salinityand sea water spray treatments. J. Arid Environ, 35: 459-471.

El-Sharnouby, S.E., Naguib, N.Y. and M.S. Hussein (1997).Effect  of gamma irradiation and sulphur fertitizer on growth and chemical composition of Hibiscus sabdarifa L., J. Physiol. Sci., 21(1):115-127.

Evans,D.A.(1984).Genetic basis of somaclonal variation in  tomato. In Plant Tissue and  Cell  Culture , Application  of Crop improvement Proceeding of  international Symposium, P.259-265. Published by Inst. of  Experimental Botany, Cezechoslovak Academy of Science, Prague.

Farid, M.R., Haba, E.A., Mahmoud, H.F. and M.M.A. El-Sawy (1999).Physiological and biochemical response of sweet marjoram (Majorana hortensis L.) to foliar kinetin application and gamma radiation.Memofiya J. Agric. Res., 24(1): 251-260.

Goel, H.C., J .Prasad, S. Singh, R.K. Sagar;P.K. Agrawala, M.Bala, A.K.Sinha and R.J. Dogra (2004). Radioprotective potential of an herbal extract of Tinospora cordifolia. J. Rad. Res. 45 (1): 61–68.

Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research.2nd ed. John Wiley and sons, Inc.New York.

Gorham,J. and R.G.Whn Jones (1993).Utilization of Triticeae for improving salt tolerance in wheat.  2: 27-33.

Gottlieb,L.D. (1977).Genetic improvement of ornamental plants. J. of  Interacademica,  1  (1) : 1-6.

Greenway, H. and R. Munns (1980). Mechanisms of salts tolerance in non halophytes. Ann. Rev.Plant Physiol. 31, 149-190.

Gupta,M.N. and R.Shukla (1971).Mutation breeding  of garden roses. Japan.J.Breed., 21:129-136.

Heidari, M. and  S. Sarani (2012). Growth, biochemical components and ion content of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) under salinity stress and iron deficiency. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences,  11: 37– 42.

Hossien,F.T.K.(1987).Medicinal Plants.p.89.Kimphetco Com., Giza,Egypt(In Arabic).

Irivine,J.E.(1984). The  frequency of marker changes in sugar cane plants regenerated from callus  culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 3:201-209.

Jaleel, C. A., R.Gopi , B.Sankar , P.Manivannan, A.Kishorekumar, R. Sridharan and R.Panneerselvam (2007). Studies on germination, seedling vigour, lipid peroxidation and proline metabolism in Catharanthus roseus seedlings under salt stress.South African J. Bot., 73 (2):190-195.

Jaleel, C. A., R. Gopi,  P. Manivannan and R. Panneerselvam (2008). Soil salinity alters the morphology in Catharanthus roseus and its effects on endogenous mineral constituents. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences . 2: 18-25.

Kaicher,M.S. and V.Swarup (1972).Induced mutation in  roses. Mutation  BreedingNewsletter Issue No.25:6-7.

Kaicher,M.S. and V.Swarup (1978).Induced mutation in  roses  cv. Gulzar  and effects of chemical and physical mutagens on plant growth. Acta  Agronomica Academia Scientiarum Hugaricae 27:43-48.

Kandeel, A.M., S.M. Hassan and A.A.  Sadek (1991).The growth  and chemical composition of Ocimum basilicum L. plants as  affected by gamma radiation. Zagazig J. Agric. Res. 18(6): 2111-2121.

Khalil,S.E. and A.A. El-Noemani (2012).Effect of irrigation intervals and exogenous proline application in improving  tolerance of  garden cress plant (Lepidium  sativum,L) to water stress. Journal  of  Applied  Sciences Research,8(1):157-167.

Khayamim, S., R. T. Afshari, S. Y.Sadeghian, K. Poustini, F. Rouzbeh and Z. Abbasi (2014). Seed germination, plant establishment, and yield of sugar beet genotypes under salinity stress.J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 16: 779-790.

Lin,C.C. and C.H.Kao (1996).Proline accumulation is associated with inhibition of rice seedling root growth caused by NaCl.Plant Sci.,144:121-128.

Loomis, W.E. and C.A.Shull (1937).Methods in Plant Physiology. Mc Graw – Hill publication in botanical science. Ed. Mund W. Sinnot (ed) pp-290.

Love,J.E. (1966).Some effects of fast neutron irradiation on the somatic tissue of Poinsettia. Proc.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci., 89:672-676.

Luo, M., Y. J.Fu, Y. G. Zu, S.Quan, P. S. Mou and Q. Y. Li (2005).Rapid determination of 4 vinca alkaloids by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography.Chin. J. Anal. Chem.(in Chinese), 33: 87–89.

Minisi, F.A, M. E. El-mahrouk, M. E. F. Rida and M. N. Nasr (2013). Effects of gamma radiation on germination, growth characteristics and morphological variations of  Moluccella  laevis L. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and  Environ., Sci., 13 (5): 696-704.

Moons, A., E. Prinsen, G. Bauw and M.V. Montagu (1997). Antagonistic effects of abscisis acid and jasmonates on salt stress induced transcripts inrice roots. Plant Cell, 9: 2243-2259.

Munns, R. (1993). Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant, Cell Environ, 16: 15-24.

Munns, R. and A. Termaat (1986). Whole plant responses to salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13,143–160.

Nikam, A. A. , R. M. Devarumath, A. Ahuja, H. Babu, M. G. Shitole and P. Suprasanna (2015). Radiation-induced in vitro mutagenesis system for salt tolerance and other agronomic characters in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.).The Crop Journal, 3(1):46-56.

Padhya, M.A. (1986). Biosynthesis of isoquinoline alkaloid berberine intissue cultures of Tinospora  cordifolia. Indian Drugs., 24: 47-48.

Pandey, S., K. Gupta and A.K. Mukherjee (2007). Impact of cadmium and lead on Catharanthus roseus - A phytoremediation study. J. Environ.Biol. 28 (3): 655-662.

Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D.R Keency (1982) Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Chemical and Microbiological  Properties. Madison, Wisconsin U.S.A.

Preil,W.(1985). In vitro propagation and breeding of ornamental plants:advantage and  disadvantage of variability . Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding, Berlin (West) Inter. Symp.Org. by Eucarpia p.55 No. 42.

Rathert, G. (1984) Sucrose and starch content of plant parts as a possible indicator for salt tolerance of crops. Aust. J. Plant Physiol, 11: 491–495.

Rashad, E. M. (1995). Physiological Studies on the Effect of Saline Irrigation Water and Some Growth regulators on Tagest erecta Plant. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac.Agric.,Zagazig Univ., Egypt.

Sabrah, N.S. and A.Y. El- Metainy (1985). Genetic distance between  local and exotic   cultivars of Vicia faba L. based on esterase isozymes variation. Egypt J. genet.Cytol., 14: 301-307.

Sain, M.  and V. Sharma (2013).Catharanthus roseus (An anti-cancerous drug yielding plant) - A Review of Potential Therapeutic Properties. International Journal of Pure  and  Applied Bioscience, 1 (6): 139-142.

Salama,S., S.Trivedi, M.Busheva, A.Arafa, A.G.Garab and L.Erdei (1994). Effects of NaCl Salinity on Growth, Cation Accumulation, Chloroplast Structure and Function in Wheat Cultivars Differing in Salt Tolerance J.Plant Physiol. 144:241-247.

Shaimaa,A.Abo-Hamad, K. M. Gh. Saad-Allah and  E. M. Abo-Kassem (2013). Effect of gamma irradiation or potassium on some primary and secondary metabolites of Brassica rapa(L.)Root Under Cadmium Stress. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 3(12) : 408-415.

Scott - Moncrieff, R. (1936). A biochemical survey of some  mendelian  factors for flower coulor . J.Genet., .32 :117. (C.F. Wagner , 1975 . P.104-107).

Skirvin.R.M.and J.Janick (1977).Separation of phenotypes in a periclinal chimera. Joural Paper No.6356 of the  Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, 7:33-35.

Sorour,M.A.E.A.E. (2011).Growth, flowering and induced variability in Ligularia japonica, L. grown from  Gamma- Rays  Treated Rhizomes. Ph. D. Thesis in  Floriculture . Faculty of Agric., Alex  Univ.

Sparrow, A.H. (1961).Types of ionizing radiationand their cytogenic effects.In "Symposium on Mutation and Plant Breeding',Publication 891:55-119.National Academy of Science-National Research Council,Washington.

Wagner, R.P. (1975). Genes and Proteins (p.99-122). Distributed by :  Halsted Press . A  division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Walbot, V. and D.Thompson  (1982). Analysis of development in Zea  mays using somatic  variability  in gene expression. In "Variability in Plants Regenerated from Tissue Culture"Eds.Elizabeth, D.E. and Yves Demarly,p.148-159.praeger Publishers,New York,M.S.A.

Watts,L. (1980). Flower and Vegetable Plant Breeding.p.21. Grower Books,London.

William, J. K., A. U. Irwin and P.M.John (1998).Effect of salinity on germination and seedling growth of two Atriplex species (Chenopodiaceae). Annals of Bot,  82:167-175.

Wu, F.B., F. Chen, K. Wei and G.P. Zhang (2004). Effect of cadmium on free amino acid, glutathione and ascorbic acid concentrations in twobarley genotypes (Hordeum vulgare L.) differing in cadmiumtolerance. Chemosphere,  57: 447-454.

Zidan,M.N. and H.S. Alzahrani (1994).Effect of NaCl on germination, seedlingand some metabolic changes in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum).Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research,37(12):541-543.

Statistics
Article View: 233
PDF Download: 296
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.