Shahein, A., Shalaby, N., Mahmoud, B. (2022). Effect of storage period and condition on cotton seed viability and its chemical composition. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 27(3), 582-591. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2022.161397.1080
A Mohamed El-Mahdy Shahein; Nagwa Ebrahim Shalaby; Badeaa Anwar Mahmoud. "Effect of storage period and condition on cotton seed viability and its chemical composition". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 27, 3, 2022, 582-591. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2022.161397.1080
Shahein, A., Shalaby, N., Mahmoud, B. (2022). 'Effect of storage period and condition on cotton seed viability and its chemical composition', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 27(3), pp. 582-591. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2022.161397.1080
Shahein, A., Shalaby, N., Mahmoud, B. Effect of storage period and condition on cotton seed viability and its chemical composition. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2022; 27(3): 582-591. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2022.161397.1080
Effect of storage period and condition on cotton seed viability and its chemical composition
1Agricultural Research Center - Field Crops Institute - Seed Technology Department
2Seed Technology Res. Dep., Field Crops Res. Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt.
3Agricultural Research Center - Cotton Research Institute
Abstract
This study was conducted at Seed Technology Research Laboratory, Sakha Agricultural Research Station, ARC, Egypt, during 2020 to 2022 years to elucidate seed germination%, seedling characters, EC, moisture content, seed index, crude protein, oil%, acidity% and free fatty acid of some cotton cultivars (Gossypium barbadense L.) due to different storage period and storage conditions. The chemical composition of the seeds with high oil content is related to specific processes occurring in the seeds during storage. In this trial, Giza45, Giza92, Giza94 and Giza96 cotton cultivars were submitted to accelerated aging for three and five days, and natural aging for six and 18 months, under controlled and conventional (non-controlled) conditions. Increasing accelerated aging period from 0 to 3 and 5 days caused decreased in germination%, seedling vigor, protein% and oil%. While, increased electrical conductivity, moisture%, acidity and free fatty acid. Generally increasing storage period reduced seed germination%, seedling vigor, oil% and protein%. While, increased electrical conductivity, moisture%, acidity and free fatty acid. Controlled conditions 42%RH gave the highest viability and seedling vigor during storage period up to 18 months compared to other storage conditions. Giza92 and Giza94 cultivars greater resistance to germination loss in artificial and natural aging than the other cultivars and gave the highest seed viability (as a results of the high seed germination%, lowest electrical conductivity, acidity % and free fatty acid). The losses of vigor, poor germination, weak and abnormal seedling are associated with an increase in the free fatty acids that produce deleterious effects on cell.
Seed deterioration can be defined as the loss of quality, viability and vigor either due to aging or effect of adverse environmental factors during storage. Oil seeds are very sensitive to the harsh environmental conditions. It is hypothesized that their oil content readily oxidize, which deteriorate the seed health in storage (Kausar et al., 2009). On Various factors such as weather conditions during seed producing stage, diseases, pests, seed oil, moisture content, mechanical damages, storage period, temperature and relative humidity on air of store can affect vigor of seeds (Cardoso et al., 2012 and Carvalho et al., 2016). Seed characteristics decrease under long storage condition due to aging. It is the reason of declining in germination, emergence and seedling growth (Soltani et al., 2008). All organisms undergo aging and it enhances under unfavorable or stress environments. Maximum germination percentage achieves immediately after harvesting and gradually decreases with storage time. Seed aging is one of the major issues in seed storage and seed storage conditions influence the germination characteristics and vigor potential of seeds. There were two important environments factors influencing the rate of deteriorative processes in seed ageing are the relatively humidity of the air, which controls the moisture content of seeds and the temperature. The sensitivity of seeds to accelerated ageing is dependent on temperature and moisture content as a constant temperature loss of seed viability is faster with increasing moister content. Seed moisture and storage temperature are the Kay role of seed longevity (Iqbal et al., 2002). A balance of seed moisture content and relative humidity is essential for seed storage. Harington (1972) found out two principles still in use that decrease influence of the moisture and temperature to the seed deterioration. The first stated that each decreased percentage of grain moisture content prolongs life of stored seed twice. The second stated that each decreased 5°C of the seed temperature prolongs life of the stored seed twice. High moisture level during the process of storing is unfavorable due to diminishing preservation ability of seed viability.
In general, the seeds are sensitive to adverse environmental conditions. The natural oil contained inside the seeds will undergo various biochemical changes and this will lead to degradation and spoilage of the seeds, during the storage period (Kausar et al., 2009). Seed aging is one of the major issues in seed storage and seed storage condition affects germination properties and vigor potential (Mc Donald, 2004). Seed aging is one of the important and inevitable processes in seed life and is primarily influenced by temperature and moisture content (Ellis and Roberts 1981).
The rate at which seed aging occurs depends on the seed’s ability to resist degradation changes by means of protection mechanisms specific to each plant species (Balešević et al. 2010). The seeds of different plant species, kept in the same storage conditions, lose their viability to a different degree. For example, onion seeds are difficult to store, while barley seeds maintain good germination under varied storage conditions (Milošević et al., 1996). The chemical composition of oilseeds causes specific processes to occur during storage. The fat-rich seeds have a limited life due to their special chemical composition. For example, storing cotton seeds requires special attention due to the high content of oil, otherwise processes may occur that lead to loss of germination capacity and seed viability.
(Kavitha et al., 2017) showed that as a conclusion, three days of accelerate ageing was equivalent to ten Months of natural storage at the time maintained the highest germination in sesame seed.
Therefore, the present study aimed to know different seed storage conditions and storage times affected the germinability and chemical composition of cotton seed and to examine the possibility of using the accelerated aging test for the assessment of reduced or preserved seed viability over time. And access to the best cultivar that can withstand storage in high relative humidity conditions while maintaining the vitality of the seeds
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The seed of cotton cultivars (Giza45, Giza92, Giza94 and Giza96) developed at Cotton Res. Institute, Agric. Res. Center, Giza, Egypt was submitted to accelerated and natural aging.
Accelerated aging (artificial aging): The seed was placed in aging chamber in metal dishes, on metal sieves immersed in a water bath at 42°C and relative humidity of 100%. The test lasted three and five days, in four replicates.
Natural aging: Seed was stored in two ways. First part was kept in controlled conditions; at 30±2 o C and relative air humidity of low 42% and height 72%. The second part was kept under conventional storage conditions (non controlled conditions in a laboratory environment) jut package were used for storing seeds. Seed characteristics were tested after harvest (control) and after six and eighteen months of storage at Seed Technology Laboratory, Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Field Crops Research Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt during November 2020 to April 2022 years.
Table 1. Monthly means of air temperature and relative humidity (RH %) from November 2020 to April 2022 at Sakha location.
Month
Air temp oC
RH%
Month
Air temp
RH%
Max*
Min**
7:30
13:30
Max*
Min**
7:30
13:30
November 2020
25.0
17.5
86.7
56.8
August 2021
34.6
28.3
85.3
48.4
December 2020
22.9
13.7
87.7
55.7
September 2021
32.5
25.0
84.1
49.5
January 2021
21.0
13.5
86.7
59.5
October 2021
29.4
21.5
76.5
61.2
February 2021
21.5
12.5
87.5
55.9
November 2021
26.7
18.8
88.1
56.2
March 2021
23.8
15.4
83.8
53.7
December 2021
20.2
12.3
87.8
59.9
April 2021
27.6
19.4
74.3
45.8
January 2022
17.6
9.9
88.1
62.6
May 2021
31.9
23.8
68.9
38.4
February 2022
19.4
10.5
87.7
53.7
June 2021
31.1
25.5
80.1
50.2
March 2022
19.1
11.2
85.6
52.5
July 2021
34.9
27.9
84.9
50.5
April 2022
27.7
19.7
76.5
45.4
* Max = maximum temperature, ** Min = minimum temperature
Germination percentage: Of fresh seed, artificially and naturally aged seed was estimated by the standard laboratory germination test, according to the Rules of International Seed Testing Association (I.S.T.A., 1999). The results of the treated seed were compared with the germinability of fresh seeds (measured at the start of the experiment and used as the control treatment). Seedling vigor: Ten normal seedlings from each replicate were taken to measure plumule length (cm), radical length (cm) and seedling dry weight (g) according to (I.S.T.A., 1999). Viability: Electrical conductivity (EC) of leached from four replicates of 50 seeds weight and soaked in 250 ml of distilled water for 24h was measured in μS.cm-1 g-1 using conductivity meter, were carried out under optimum conditions according to the international rules ( I.S.T.A., 1999).Seed index: One hundred seeds were counted and weighted this was carried out according to the (I.S.T.A., 1999) Regulations. Crude protein: Known weight of the fine powdered seeds (ca 0.1g) was digested using a micro kjeldahl apparatus. The crude protein was calculated by multiplying the total nitrogen by 6.25 (A.O.A.C 2000). Oil percentage: Oil of the seeds was extracted by Soxhlet`s extractor using Petroleum ether (60-80°C) was preferred for extractions which continued for not less than eight hours (rate of siphoning was 6-7 /hr.) according to the methods of (A.O.A.C. 2000). Moisture content, Acidity % and free fatty acid(F.F.A): were determined according to the methods of (A.O.A.C. 2000).
Collected data were analyzed according to the completely randomized design (CRD) and replicated four times. Analysis of variance computed according to Snedecor and Cochran (1982) and treatment means was compared by Duncan Multiple Range Test, (Duncan, 1955). All the treatments were compared at 0.5% level of significance using the critical difference test. All statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance technique by “MSTAT-C” (1990) computer software package.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Artificial aging of cotton seeds cause a significant deterioration in the seed germination percentage, plumule length and radical length, protein % and oil%. Seed germination percentage, plumule length, radical length, protein% and oil% decreased by increasing accelerated aging for three and five days, while seedling dry weight was insignificant. On the other hand, the electrical conductivity, seed moisture %, seed index, acidity% and free fatty acid% were increased by increasing accelerated aging for three and five days in Tables 2 and 3. The losses of vigor, poor germination and abnormal seedling are associated with an increase in the free fatty acids that produce deleterious effects on cell. Iqbal et al., (2002). The sensitivity of seeds to accelerated ageing is dependent on temperature and on their moisture content as a constant temperature loss of seed viability is faster with increasing moister content, seed moisture and storage temperature the role in seed longevity.
These results are in agreement with both Sultanet al. (2020) reported that the electrolyte leakage was increased with the increasing of aging stress. Increased electrolyte leakage with aging confirmed the inferior quality of aged seeds. However, germination % from 48h to 72h, root fresh weight and shoot fresh weight from 24h to 72h were decreased with the increasing of aging stress. Seed germination percentage, seedling characters, protein % and oil % were reduced with increasing seed aged and similar trend was obtained when the same experiment was done in sunflower seed by Ranganathan and Thiagarajah (2015) and in maize by Ranganathan (2015). Negative effect of aging was observed in parameters such as seed germination percentage and seedling indices showed negative effect of aging Siadat et al. (2012). Differences in seed germination were observed among different temperature and relative humidity levels, although those differences were significant in viability values. Decreasing in the percentage of seed germination might be due to the chromosomal aberrations that take place under long term storage conditions of seeds Akhtar et al. (1992).
Table 2: Mean values of seed germination %, seedling vigor, electrical conductivity, seed index (g) and moisture% as affected by artificial aging of cotton cultivars.
Treatments
Germination %
Seedling vigor
Electrical conductivity μS.cm-1 g-1
Seed index (g)
Moisture %
plumule length (cm)
Radical length (cm)
Seedling dry weight (g)
Artificial aging
0 day
93.7 a
13.5 a
16.3 a
0.311
19.6 c
10.5 c
10.7 c
3 days
82.9 b
9.7 b
12.2 b
0.301
23.2 b
11.0 b
11.3 b
5 days
62.7 c
6.3 c
8.8 c
0.296
25.9 a
11.3 a
13.4 a
F-Test
**
**
**
NS
**
**
**
Cultivars
Giza45
71.1 c
7.2 d
11.8 c
0.301
25.4 a
11.8 a
12.3 a
Giza92
83.9 a
13.8 a
16.5 a
0.321
19.3d
9.6 d
11.1 b
Giza94
85.8 a
10.3 b
13.8 b
0.294
20.0c
10.2 c
11.3 b
Giza96
75.8 b
9.3 c
10.4 c
0.305
23.0 b
11.1 b
12.4 a
F-Test
**
**
**
NS
**
**
*
AXB
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
**
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
Tables 2 and 3 indicated that the seed germination %, seedling vigor, electrical conductivity, seed index, moisture content%, protein, oil%, acidity% and free fatty acid% of cotton seeds were significantly affected by cultivars except seedling dry weight. Giza92 and Giza94 cultivars gave the longest lifespan according to highest germination percentage. On the other hand were gave the lowest values of electrical conductivity, seed index, moisture content, acidity and free fatty acid. Elevated levels of free fatty acids which are toxic to most cells, are not present in healthy seed tissues. So, it can be concluded that free fat acidity contribute to the degradation of seeds through membranes rupture.
Table 3: Mean values of seed protein %, oil%, acidity% and F.F.A as affected by artificial aging of cotton cultivars.
Treatments
Protein %
Oil %
Acidity %
F.F.A%
Artificial aging
0 day
24.0 a
23.4 a
9.7 c
0.256 c
3 day
23.2 b
22.6 b
12.2 b
0.288 b
5 day
21.9 c
21.3 c
15.2 a
0.320 a
F-test
**
**
**
**
Cultivars
Giza45
23.5 a
22.2 c
15.7 a
0.284 ab
Giza92
22.8 b
23.5 a
11.2 bc
0.275 b
Giza94
22.6 b
23.0 b
10.8 c
0.279 b
Giza96
23.3 a
21.1 d
11.8 b
0.314 a
F-test
**
**
**
**
AXB
**
**
**
*
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
Data showed in Table 4 the interaction between artificial aging and cultivars was significantly in moisture %, protein%, oil%, acidity% and free fatty acid%. Data showed significant decrease in moisture %, acidity% and free fatty acid% in the zero days (control) and up to 5 days with Giza 92 and Giza94 cultivars. Giza 92 followed by Giza94cultivars retained its high oil content% and the lowest free fatty acid under high deterioration conditions when 5 days of aging compared to another cultivars.
Table 4: Interaction of artificial aging and cultivars on moisture %, protein%, oil %, acidity% and F.F.A% of cotton.
Aging
Cultivars
Moisture %
Protein%
Oil %
Acidity%
F.F.A%
0 days (control)
Giza45
10.8 f
24.4 a
23.0 d
12.1 d
0.256 cde
Giza92
10.5 f
23.7 b
24.4 a
9.1 g
0.244 e
Giza94
10.6 f
23.6 b
24.0 ab
7.6 h
0.253 de
Giza96
11.2 e
24.2 a
22.4 e
9.9 fg
0.272 b-e
3 days
Giza45
11.5 c
23.6 b
22.3 ef
15.5 b
0.288 b-e
Giza92
10.9 f
23.0 c
23.5 bc
11.0 de
0.271 b-e
Giza94
11.1 e
22.8 c
23.2 cd
10.3 ef
0.284 b-e
Giza96
11.5 c
23.5 b
21.4 gh
11.9 d
0.300 bcd
5 days
Giza45
14.4 b
22.4 d
21.2 h
19.4 a
0.311 ab
Giza92
11.8 d
21.7 e
22.7 de
13.5 c
0.310 ab
Giza94
12.3 c
21.5 e
21.8 fg
13.6 c
0.308 abc
Giza96
15.0 a
22.2 d
19.5 i
14.5 bc
0.361 a
F-test
**
**
**
**
*
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
Concerning the duration of storage, reduced seed germination%, plumule length, radical length and seedling dry weight was observed in cotton seed by increasing storage period Table 5. Results revealed that before storage treatments significantly exceeded the other storage periods seed germination % (94.5 %), plumule length (10.9 cm), radical length (13.3 cm) and seedling dry weight (0.287 g) followed by after 6 months. While, after 18 months from storage recorded lowest seed germination % (68.6%), plumule length (8.1 cm), radical length (9.3 cm) and seedling dry weight (0.266 g). In this regard, Manomani (2002) reported that the decline in seedling length and seedling dry weight with increase of storage periods might be due to their genetic differences age induced deterioration, inherent differences in seed structure and composition. In addition, Mohammadi et al. (2011) reported that seed deterioration results in decreased percentage of seed germination % and seedling length. Seedling growth and the fraction of seed reserve mobilization indicated a significant reduced with the advance of deterioration. El-Sayed et al. (2017) reported that increasing storage period after harvest time until 12 month affected significantly most studied characters such as germination%, seedling vigor, moisture content, seed index, crude protein and oil%. Ramya et al. (2018) showed that seedling parameters i.e. seed germination %, seedling length and seedling dry weight were decreased with the period of storage. On the other hand, electrical conductivity, seed moisture % and seed index increasing with increased storage period from 0 to 6 month and 18 months. This is a result of the high relative humidity around the seed, which leads to an increase in the absorption of moisture by the seed membrane, which leads to a high weight of seed index, which helps to increase the deterioration of the seed as a result of the increase in the moisture content in it. Hussein et al. (2012) showed that electrical conductivity of the seed is a measure of membrane functions the results on individual seed conductivity indicates that membrane function is less damaged when the seeds are aged for a short time and membranes are likely to be responsible for the slower growth and germination in aged seeds.
Decrease of seed quality is connected with bio-chemical changes in seeds of oil crops. The longer seeds storage period increases intensity of seeds aging. Also increasing storage period from zero to 6 and 18 month significantly decreased the mean crude protein 24.0, 23.0 and 22.1 %, oil% 23.3, 22.5 and 21.9 %. While, acidity and free fatty acid increased by increasing storage period from zero to 6 month and 18 months Table 6. Elevated levels of free fatty acids which are toxic to most cells, are not present in healthy seed tissues. So, it can be concluded that free fatty acidity contribute to the degradation of seeds through membranes rupture. These results are in good agreement with those reported by Meena et al. (2017), Kavitha et al. (2017) and Alaa and Nagwa (2021).
Table 5: Mean values of seed germination %, seedling vigor, electrical conductivity, seed index (g), seed index (g) and moisture % as affected by storage period and storage conditions of cotton cultivars.
Treatments
Germination %
Seedling vigor
Electrical conductivity µSm-1g-1
Seed index (g)
Moisture %
Plumule length (cm)
Radical length (cm)
Seedling dry weight (g)
Storage period
Zero
94.5 a
10.9 a
13.3 a
0.287 a
15.7 c
10.0 c
10.2 c
6 month
83.1 b
8.9 b
10.3 b
0.273 ab
20.2 b
10.5 b
12.4 b
18 month
68.6 c
8.1 c
9.3 c
0.266 b
25.3 a
10.9 a
13.0 a
F-test
**
**
**
*
**
*
**
Storage conditions
controlled conditions 42%rh
87.8 a
10.4 a
12.4 a
0.284 a
17.3 c
10.3 c
11.3 c
controlled conditions72%rh
82.9 b
9.0 b
10.6 b
0.275 ab
20.4 b
10.5 b
12.0 b
conventional storage
79.6 c
8.6 c
9.8 c
0.268 b
23.6 a
10.7 a
12.3 a
F-test
**
**
**
*
**
*
**
Cultivars
Giza45
76.1 c
8.3 d
9.5 c
0.269 b
25.4 a
12.2 a
12.3 a
Giza92
89.4 a
9.8 b
11.6 b
0.288 a
18.6 b
9.3 c
11.4 d
Giza94
88.0 a
10.8 a
12.8 a
0.302 a
13.6 c
8.9 d
11.7 d
Giza96
80.1 b
8.7 c
9.9 c
0.243 c
23.9 a
11.5 b
12.1 b
F-test
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
Interactions
AXB
**
*
*
N.S
**
N.S
N.S
AXC
**
**
**
N.S
**
N.S
N.S
BXC
*
**
**
N.S
N.S
**
**
AXBXC
N.S
**
**
N.S
N.S
N.S
**
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
Table 6: Mean values of protein%, oil%, acidity% and F.F.A% as affected by storage period and storage conditions of cotton cultivars.
Treatments
Protein%
Oil %
Acidity %
F.F.A %
Storage period
Zero
24.0 a
23.3 a
9.7 c
0.255 b
6 month
23.0 b
22.5 b
13.0 b
0.350 a
18 month
22.1 c
21.9 c
15.1 a
0.417 a
F-test
**
**
**
**
Storage conditions
controlled conditions 42%rh
23.3 a
23.1 a
11.6 c
0.300 c
controlled conditions72%rh
23.0 b
22.6 b
12.6 b
0.347 b
conventional storage
22.8 c
22.0 c
13.6 a
0.398 a
F-test
**
*
**
*
Cultivars
Giza45
23.5 a
22.4 c
15.8 a
0.351 a
Giza92
22.8 c
23.4 a
12.1 c
0.319 b
Giza94
22.5 d
22.9 b
10.2 d
0.309 b
Giza96
23.3 b
21.7 d
12.5 b
0.351 a
F-test
**
**
**
*
Interaction
AXB
**
**
**
N.S
AXC
**
**
**
*
BXC
**
**
**
N.S
AXBXC
N.S
N.S
N.S
N.S
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
The results showed that a significant effect of storage conditions on the average of seed germination%, plumule length, radical length, seedling dry weight, electrical conductivity, moisture content%, seed index, crud protein%, Oil%, acidity% and free fatty acid% Tables 5 and 6. The results clearly indicated that storage under controlled conditions 42% relative humidity gave the highest in seed germination percentage, plumule and radical length, seedling dry weight and the lowest of values of electrical conductivity, seed moisture content, seed index, acidity% and free fatty acid compared to the controlled conditions 72% RH and conventional storage. The seeds stored under controlled conditions 42% RH showed better seed quality values compared with the other two storage conditions where the crude protein % was (23.3 %) and oil% was (23.1 %). Under the low relative humidity storage conditions even the seed metabolic activities maintained at a lower rate and minimizing the deterioration. The results showed that losses of vigor, poor germination, weak and abnormal seedling are associated with an increase in the free fatty acids that produce deleterious effects on cell. Elevated levels of free fatty acids which are toxic to most cells, are not present in healthy seed tissues. So, it can be concluded that free fat acidity contribute to the degradation of seeds through membranes rupture Iqbal et al. (2002).
The results were in accordance with Singh et al. (2016) and Ramya et al. (2018) reveled that storage under refrigerator conditions at low temperatures had superior quality maintained compared to storage under dry cold room and ambient conditions in all the seedling parameters. Seed aging during storage is inevitable Phenomenon, but the degree and speed of decline in seed quality depends strongly besides the storage conditions, the types of plants stored and the quality of the primary seeds Balešević-Tubić et al. (2005) as well as on the genetic features of seeds Malenić et al. (2003).Milosevic et al. (1996) also suggested that seed longevity is genetically determined, and that significant differences exist between varieties of same crop in its ability to maintain quality during storage. So they are it was suggested that seed longevity could be improved through appropriate breeding procedures. Nishtha and Brar (2015) showed that at 45% and 60% RH retained better viability and vigor content but at 75% and 90% RH all containers failed to maintain the viability and vigor of seeds.
Giza 92 cultivar followed by Giza 94 greater resistance to germination loss in storage that the other cultivars, and gave the highest plumule and radical length, seedling dry weight, oil % and gave the lowest values of electrical conductivity, seed moisture content, seed index, acidity% and free fatty acid%. Several cultivars of the same species that were compared for seed longevity differed significantly. Electrical conductivity of the seed is a measure of membrane functions, the results on individual seed conductivity indicate that membrane function is less damaged when the seeds are aged for a short time and membranes are likely to be responsible for the slower growth and germination in aged seeds Hussein et a.l (2012). El-Sayed et al. (2017) reported that there are differences in the seed germination%, vitality of seeds and chemical composition between the cultivars and these imbalances may be due to genetic differences between the cultivars tolerance storage conditions. Asseri et al. (2021) reported that the higher seed germination %, root length, shoot length and seedling dry weight were obtained with Giza94 cultivar.
The interaction between storage period and storage conditions according to data collected is presented in Table 7. Data showed that significant decreased in seed germination%, plumule and radical length and protein % and increased in electrical conductivity, acidity% and free fatty acid% up to 18 month. Controlled conditions 42% RH gave the highest seed germination%, plumule and radical length, crud protein% and oil% in 6 month and 18 month and the lowest in electrical conductivity, acidity% and free fatty acid in 6 month and 18 month, respectively. This mean the controlled conditions 42% RH in both storage periodproduced the highest viability (by increasing seed germination% and decreasing both of electrical conductivity, acidity and free fatty acid) so it is a best treatment.
Table 7: Interaction of storage period and storage conditions on seed germination %, seedling length (cm), electrical conductivity, protein%, oil%, acidity% and F.F.A% of cotton.
Storage period
Storage condition
Germination %
Seedling length
Electrical conductivity µSm-1g-1
Protein %
Oil %
Acidity %
F.F.A%
Plumule length (cm)
Radical length (cm)
Zero
controlled conditions 42%rh
94.5 a
11.0 a
13.3 a
15.7 e
24.0 a
23.7 a
9.7 g
0.256 e
controlled conditions72%rh
94.5 a
11.0 a
13.3 a
15.7 e
24.0 a
23.7 a
9.7 g
0.226 e
conventional storage
94.5 a
11.0 a
13.3 a
15.7 e
24.0 a
23.7 a
9.7 g
0.256 e
6 month
controlled conditions 42%rh
89.8 b
10.3 b
12.4 ab
17.5 de
23.4 b
22.8 b
11.5 f
0.294 de
controlled conditions72%rh
82.8 c
8.2 c
10.1 c
20.5 cd
23.0 c
22.5 c
13.1 e
0.340 cde
conventional storage
76.7 d
7.7 d
8.4 d
22.6 bc
22.7 d
22.2 d
14.4 c
0.436 ab
18 month
controlled conditions 42%rh
75.9 d
10.1 b
11.7 b
18.6 de
22.4 e
21.7 e
13.5 d
0.349 bcd
controlled conditions72%rh
69.4 e
7.7 d
8.5 d
25.0 b
22.1 f
21.6 e
15.1 b
0.384 bc
conventional storage
63.5 f
7.1 e
7.7 d
28.5 a
21.7 g
21.3 f
16.8 a
0.465 a
F-test
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
The interaction effect between storage period and cotton cultivars is presented in Table 8. Data showed significant decreased in seed germination %, seedling vigor, protein content% and oil % up to 18 months storage. In general, Giza92 and Giza94 cultivars gave the longest lifespan according to the high percentage of seed germination. While, Giza94 cultivar gave the highest plumule and radical length with control period. Giza92 and Giza94 cultivars surpassed in seed germination%, plumule and radical length and oil%. While were the lowest values of electrical conductivity and acidity with 6 months and the best cultivars when stored up to 18 months.
Table 8: Interaction of storage period and cultivars on seed germination %, seedling length (cm), electrical conductivity, protein%, oil% and acidity% of cotton.
Storage period
Cultivars
Germination %
Seedling length
Electrical conductivity µSm-1g-1
Protein %
Oil %
Acidity %
Plumule length (cm)
Radical length (cm)
Zero
Giza45
88.0 bc
9.6 cd
10.7 e
17.5 e-g
24.4 a
22.3 f
12.2 e
Giza92
99.3 a
10.6 b
14.0 b
14.2 gh
23.7 c
24.2 a
9.2 h
Giza94
100.0 a
13.5 a
16.3 a
13.2 h
23.6 d
23.4 c
7.6 i
Giza96
90.7 b
10.1 c
12.1 c
17.8 ef
24.2 b
23.1 d
9.9 g
6 month
Giza45
75.0 e
8.0 fg
9.1 ghi
24.3 c
23.5 d
21.6 h
16.3 b
Giza92
89.8 bc
8.8 e
10.7 de
19.2 de
22.7 f
23.6 b
12.6 d
Giza94
87.4 c
9.8 c
11.9 cd
13.4 h
22.5 h
23.1 d
10.4 f
Giza96
80.1 d
8.4 ef
9.4 fgh
23.8 c
23.4 e
21.7 h
12.7 d
18 month
Giza45
62.2 g
7.2 h
8.6 hi
34.3 a
22.4 h
21.1 i
18.8 a
Giza92
77.2 d
8.6 e
10.0 efg
22.5 cd
21.5 j
22.8 e
14.5 c
Giza94
73.4 e
9.3 d
10.3 ef
14.3 f-h
21.8 i
22.0 g
12.5 de
Giza96
66.6 f
7.8 gh
8.2 i
30.3 b
22.6 g
21.7 h
14.8 c
F-test
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
The interaction between storage conditions and cotton cultivars according to data collected is presented in Table 9. Results showed that significant increase in seed germination %, plumule and radical length, protein content % and oil% when seeds stored incontrolled conditions 42% relative humidity for the cultivars compared to controlled conditions 72% relative humidity and conventional storage. Giza92 and Giza94 gave the highest seed longevity and oil% and lowest moisture content, seed index and acidity when stored in controlled conditions at 42% and 72% relative humidity and conventional storage compared to other cultivars for period of up to 18 months.
Table 9: Interaction between storage conditions and cultivars on seed germination%, seedling length (cm), seed index (g), moisture content%, protein%, oil% and acidity% of cotton.
Storage conditions
Cultivars
Germination %
Seedling length
Seed index (g)
Moisture content %
Protein %
Oil %
Acidity %
Plumule length (cm)
Radical length (cm)
controlled conditions 42%rh
Giza45
80.6 d
8.9 def
9.8 efg
8.7 g
11.8 bcd
23.7 a
22.1 e
14.4 c
Giza92
92.9 a
10.0 b
12.6 b
9.2 f
11.4 d
22.9 ef
23.9 a
11.0 h
Giza94
93.3 a
13.5 a
16.3 a
8.9 f
10.2 e
22.9 ef
23.6 b
9.3 j
Giza96
84.2 c
9.3 cd
11.0 cd
11.4 d
11.8 bcd
23.5 b
22.7 c
11.7 g
controlled conditions72%rh
Giza45
75.0 ef
8.2 hi
9.5 fg
12.2 a
12.4 ab
23.3 c
21.6 f
15.6 b
Giza92
89.8 b
9.2 de
11.4 cd
9.4 e
11.6 cd
22.4 h
23.5 b
12.1 f
Giza94
86.4 c
9.8 bc
11.8 bc
9.5 e
11.9 bcd
22.8 f
22.7 c
10.3 i
Giza96
80.3 d
8.6 fgh
9.6 efg
11.9 b
12.1 bc
23.3 c
22.1 e
12.5 e
conventional storage
Giza45
72.7 f
7.9 i
9.1 g
12.4 a
12.7 a
23.1 d
21.2 g
17.3 a
Giza92
85.7 c
8.8 efg
10.8 cde
9.1 f
12.0 bcd
22.2 i
22.6 c
13.2 d
Giza94
84.1 c
9.2 de
10.4 def
10.9 d
12.0 bcd
22.5 g
22.4 d
10.9 h
Giza96
75.8 ef
8.3 ghi
9.0 g
11.6 c
12.4 ab
23.1 d
21.6 f
13.2 d
F-test
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
*, ** and NS indicated P< 0.01, 0.05 and not significant, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Accelerated aging tests on changes in cotton seeds demonstrated that the degree of seed degradation during natural aging and the possibility of seed storage in the laboratory could be predicted. The best method of storage seeds is the one that causes the slightest changes in the biological nature of the seeds, which can be achieved through proper regulation of air humidity and relative temperature. Even the most sensitive seed will retain a high level of viability for several years if stored with low moisture content and at low temperature.
Accelerated and natural aging reduced the cottonseed germination and viability under this study. Seeds aged up to three days showed improved germination percentage. This may be due to slow hydration, as in priming, which is hydro-priming technique that alters germination character and improves germination percentage. Increasing the period of artificial ageing up to five days and 18 months of seed storage produced deleterious effects on seeds and germination ability were reduced significantly. Low germination percentage is related to seed deterioration and poor quality.
The data showed that five days of accelerate ageing was equivalent to eighteen months of natural storage in the extent of deterioration that occurred to the seed and the weakening of the vitality of the seed
Therefore, it is recommended to use the cotton cultivars Giza92 and Giza94 grades for storage seeds for longer periods up to 18 months and storing seed at higher relative humidity up to 72%RH and conventional storage to gave the highest seed viability by (increasing the seed germination% and lowest electrical conductivity, acidity and free fatty acid), seed survival, oil and protein% content.
الملخص العربي
تأثير فتره و ظروف التخزين علي حيويه بذور القطن و تركيبها الكيماوي
آلاء محمد المهدي أحمد شاهين 1و نجوي إبراهيم شلبي1 و بديعه أنور محمود2
1.قسم تكنولوجيا البذور- معهد المحاصيل الحقليه - مركز البحوث الزراعيه
2.معهد بحوث القطن –مركز البحوث الزراعيه
أجريت هذة الدراسة بقسم بحوث تكنولوجيا البذور بمحطة البحوث الزراعية بسخا خلال الفترة 2018 إلى 2020 لتوضيح نسبة الانبات وصفات البادرة والتوصيل الكهربائي ومحتوى الرطوبة ووزن 100بذره ونسبة الزيت % ونسبة البروتين % و نسبه الزيت و الحموضه % و الاحماض الدهنيه الحره لبعض أصناف القطن و مدي تأثرها بفترات و ظروف التخزين المختلفة. يرتبط التركيب الكيميائي للبذور التي تحتوي على نسبة عالية من الزيت بعمليات معينه تحدث في البذور أثناء التخزين. في هذه التجربة ، تم إخضاع الصنف جيزة 45 و جيزة 92 و جيزة 94 و جيزة 96 للتدهور الصناعي لمدة ثلاثة وخمسة أيام . أدت زيادة فترة التدهور الصناعي من صفر إلى 3 و 5 أيام إلى انخفاض في نسبة الإنبات وحيوية البادرات ونسبة الزيت و نسبة البروتين. بينما زادت نسبة التوصيل الكهربائي ونسبة الرطوبه والحموضه الكليه و الأحماض الدهنيه الحره. و بشكل عام ، أدت زيادة فترة التخزين إلى انخفاض نسبة الإنبات وحيوية البادرات ونسبة الزيت والبروتين. بينما زادت نسبة التوصيل الكهربائي ونسبة الرطوبة والحموضة الكليه و الأحماض الدهنيه الحره. أعطت الظروف المتحكم فيها 42% رطوبه نسبيه أعلي حيويه و قوة البادرات لفترة تخزين تصل إلي 18 شهر بالمقارنه بالظروف الأخري. أعطي كلا من الصنف جيزة 92 و جيزة 94 مقاومه أكبر لفقد الأنبات و ذلك خلال فترة التدهور الصناعي و الطبيعي عن باقي الأصناف و أعطي أعلي حيوية للبذرة (و ذلك كنتيجه لأرتفاع نسبة الأنبات و إنخفاض كلا من التوصيل الكهربي و الحموضه الكليه و الأحماض الدهنيه الحره). يرتبط كلا من الفقد في الحيويه و ضعف الإنبات و الشتلات الضعيفه و الغير طبيعيه بزيادة نسبة الأحماض الدهنيه الحره التي تنتج آثارًا ضارة على الخلية.
References
A.O.A.C. (2000). Association of official agricultural chemists, official methods of analysis. 14th ed Washington, D.C.
Akhter, F.N., G. Kabir, M. A. Mannan and N. N. Shaheen (1992). Aging effect of wheat and barley seeds upon germination mitotic index and chromosomal damage. J Islam Acad Sci. 5:44-48.
Alaa, M. E. A. Shahein and Nagwa E. Shalaby (2021). Longevity of Maize Seed (Zea mays L.) under Different Storage Conditions. J. Sus. Agric. Sci. 47(4):45-55.
Asseri, I. A., A. M. Omar, M. E Mosalm, W.M. B Yehia, Azza El-Sayed and K. A Abdelaal (2021). Effect of storage period varieties storage environments and packaging material on cotton germination and seedling parameters. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 30( 06A): 6633-6641.
Balešević,-Tubić, S., D. Malenčić, M. Tatić and J. Miladinović (2005). Influence of aging process on biochemical changes in sunflower seed. Helia. 28(42): 107-114.
Balešević-Tubić, S., M. Tatić, V. Ðorđević, Z. Nikolić and V. Ðukić (2010). Seed viability of oil crops depending on storage conditions. HELIA. 33(52): 153-160.
Cardoso, R.B., Binotti, F.F.S., Cardoso, E.D (2012). Potencial fisiológico de sementes de crambe em função de embalagens earmazenamento. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, v. 42, n.3, p.272-278.
Carvalho, E.R., Oliveira, J.A, M., Denilson P.D., Silva, H.W.L., Cassiano G.M (2016). Pre-packing cooling and types of packages in maintaining physiological quality of soybean seeds during storage. Journal of Seed Science, 38(2), 129-139.
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple ranges and multiple F.Test. Biometrics II: 1-42.
Ellis, R. A and E. H. Roberts (1981). The quantification of ageing and survival in orthodox seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 9: 373-409.
El-Sayed, A. Soad, Eman N. M. Mohamed and Badeaa A. Mahamoud (2017). The relationship between viability parameters and quality of cotton seed under different storage conditions. Egypt J. Plant Breed. 21(7):1375-1390.
Harrington, J. F. (1972). Seed storage and longevity. Int. Seed Biology, 3rd, ed. New York: Academic
Hussein, J. H., I. S. Abdulla and M. Y. Oda M. (2012). Effect of accelerated aging on vigor of local maize seeds in term of electrical conductivity and relative growth rate (rgr). Iraqi Journal of Science.53(2): 285-291.
Iqbal, N., S.M.A. Basra and K. UR-Rehman (2002). Evaluation of vigour and oil quality in cottonseed during accelerated aging. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 4(3): 318-322.
ISTA (1999). International Rules for Seed Testing. International Seed Testing Association, Switzerland.
Kausar, M, T. Mahmood, S. M. A. Basra and M. Arshad (2009). Invigoration of low vigor sunflower hybrids by seed priming. Int J Agric Biol. 11:521-528.
Kavitha, S., C. Menaka and M. Ananthi (2017). Deterioration in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seeds under natural and accelerated ageing. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 5(4): 1141-1146.
Malenčić, Ð., M. Popović and J. Miladinović (2003). Stress tolerance parameters in different genotypes of soybean. Biology Plantarum. 46: 141-143.
Manomani, V. (2002). Storability of dormant and non-dormant cultivars of groundnut Arachis hypogaea L. Seed Research. 30(1): 158-160.
Mc Donald, M. B. (2004). Orthodox seed deterioration and its repair. Handbook of Seed Physiology: Applications to Agriculture, Benech-Arnold R L and R.A. Sanchez (Eds.). Food Products Press, New York. pp.273-304
Meena, M. K., M. B. Chetti and C. M. Nawalagatti (2017). Influence of different packaging materials and storage conditions on the seed quality parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5(1): 933-941.
Milošević, M., M. Ćirović, I. Mihaljev and P. Dokić, (1996). Opšte semenarstvo, Feljton, Novi Sad. 148-153.
Mohammadi, H., A. Soltani, H. R. Sadeghipour and E. Zeinali (2011). Effect of seed aging on subsequent seed reserve utilization and seedling growth in soybean. International Jour. Plant Production. 5: 65-70.
MSTATC, (1990). Microcomputer Program for Design Experiment and Analysis of Agronomic Research Experiments Michigan State Univ.
Nishtha, Y and R. S. Brar (2015). Assessment of cotton seed deterioration during: Accelerated ageing: changes in physiological aspects. Plant Archives. 5(2):1167-1173.
Ramya, M. J., G. U. Kulkarni and R. Deepthi (2018). Effect of packaging material, storage conditions and storage period on seed quality parameters of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 6 (5): 309-313.
Ranganathan, K and M. Thiagarajah (2015). Effect of aging on the germination characteristics and enzyme activity of sunflower seeds. International Journal of Research and Innovations in Earth Science. 2(6): 2394-1375.
Ranganathan, K (2015). Accelerated aging declines the germination characteristics of the maize seeds. Sch. Acad. J. Biosci. 3(8):708-711.
Snedecor, G.W. and W. G. Cochran (1982). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. 7th ed. Seventh reprinting. The IOWA State Univ. Press. Ames, IOWA, U.S.A.
Siadat, S.A., A. Moosavi and M. Sharafizadeh (2012). Effect of seed priming on antioxidant activity and germination characteristics of maize seeds under different aging treatments. Research Journal of Seed Science. 5(2): 51- 62.
Singh, N., S. Dash and Y. J. Khan (2016). Survival of chickpea, sesame, castor and safflower seeds stored at low and ultra-low moisture contents for 16-18 years. Seed Sci. & Technol. 44(3): 542-555.
Soltani, E., B. Kamkar, S. Galeshi and F. Akram Ghaderi (2008). The effect of seed deterioration on seed reserves depletion and heterotrophic seedling growth of wheat. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 15(1):13-17.
Sultan, M. S., M. A. Abdel-Moneam, Y. M. EL-Mansy, B. R. Goda and Doha A. Attia (2020). Impact of accelerated ageing process on viability of Egyptian cotton seeds. J. of Plant Production, Mansoura Univ. 11 (2):153 - 157.