Abd-Elaziz, M., Darwish, M., Aboyousef, H., Afife, A., Ismail, M., Hassan, N. (2024). Diallel Analysis of Seven Maize Inbred Lines for Different Characters across Locations. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 29(1), 16-21. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.259048.1184
M. A.A. Abd-Elaziz; M. M.B. Darwish; H. A. Aboyousef; A. A.M. Afife; M. R. Ismail; Noura A. Hassan. "Diallel Analysis of Seven Maize Inbred Lines for Different Characters across Locations". Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 29, 1, 2024, 16-21. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.259048.1184
Abd-Elaziz, M., Darwish, M., Aboyousef, H., Afife, A., Ismail, M., Hassan, N. (2024). 'Diallel Analysis of Seven Maize Inbred Lines for Different Characters across Locations', Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 29(1), pp. 16-21. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.259048.1184
Abd-Elaziz, M., Darwish, M., Aboyousef, H., Afife, A., Ismail, M., Hassan, N. Diallel Analysis of Seven Maize Inbred Lines for Different Characters across Locations. Journal of the Advances in Agricultural Researches, 2024; 29(1): 16-21. doi: 10.21608/jalexu.2024.259048.1184
Diallel Analysis of Seven Maize Inbred Lines for Different Characters across Locations
Maize Research Dept., Field Crops Research Institute, ARC, Giza, Egypt.
Abstract
Seven elite yellow maize inbred lines derived from different genetic sources were evaluated in this study to estimate combining ability, type of gene action, and superiority crosses over commercial check hybrids. In 2021 growing season, all possible combinations between these inbred lines were done, excluding reciprocals (Griffing's 1956, method 4, model 1) at Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, located in the center of the delta, Gharbia governorate, Egypt. In 2022 season, the resulting 21 crosses along with two commercial crosses; SC. 168 and Pioneer SC. 3444 were evaluated in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications at the three Research Stations (Locations); Gemmeiza, Mallawi and Nubaria. Recorded data were days to 50% silking, plant height, ear height and grain yield. The results showed significant differences for all the studied traits between the three locations. Mean squares of crosses and their partitions, GCA and SCA were highly significant for all studied traits, meaning that both additive and non-additive gene effects were important in the inheritance of all studied traits, however the additive gene effects played the major role in the inheritance of days to 50% silking, ear height, and grain yield, meanwhile, the non-additive gene effects were predominance for the inheritance of plant height. The parental lines Gm 6022, Gm 36 and Gz 639 had significant GCA effects for grain yield. Seven crosses (Gm 5 x Gm 36), (Gm 5 x Gz 639), (Gm 6052 x Gm 74), (Gm 6022 x Gm 15), (Gm 74 x Gm 36), (Gm 15 x Gm 10) and (Gm 10 x Gz 639) showed significant values for SCA effects for grain yield. Cross Gm 6052 x Gm 74 significantly out yielded (34.23 ard/fed) the best check SC 168 (30.87 ard/fed) and is recommended for further evaluation to be registered as new hybrid.
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most strategic crops in Egypt and worldwide. It is essentially consumed for both human food and animal feed. It is used as a raw material for many industrial products (El-Hosary et al., 2018). Egypt imported more than 50% of its maize grain consumption. So, maize breeders in Egypt encouraged to produce new hybrids with high yield to decrease this gap between production and consumption. Identifying the combining ability of maize genotypes is important to produce the promising hybrids. Diallel analysis provides information about the components of genetic variations and help the breeder in the selection of desirable parents for crossing program and in deciding a suitable breeding procedure for the genetic improvement of various quantitative traits. Sprague and Tatum (1942) defined general (GCA) and specific (SCA) combining ability. Melchenger et al. (1990), Zelleke (2000), Mosa (2006) and Mosa et al. (2023) found that both GCA and SCA were significant for grain yield, silking date, plant and ear height. Hence both additive and non-additive gene effects were important for these traits. However Abd El-Mottalb et al. (2014), Abo El-Haress (2015), El-Hosary et al. (2018) and Abd El-Azeem et al. (2021) reported that additive gene effects have the important role in inheritance of grain yield. Other researchers reported that the non-additive gene effects were the major role in the inheritance of grain yield (Attia et al. 2015, Kamara 2015, Wani et al. 2017, Murtadha et al. 2018 and Kamara et al. 2019). This investigation aimed to estimate the combining ability of some elite maize inbred lines and to identify superior hybrids to improve the yielding ability in maize breeding programs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seven elite yellow maize inbred lines were used as parents in this study. The code number and names of inbreds are presented in Table (1). In 2021 growing season, all possible combinations without reciprocals crosses were made among these inbred lines in half diallel fashion to obtain 21 F1 crosses. In 2022 growing season, the resulted 21 F1 hybrids and two check hybrids SC168 and SC Pioneer 3444 were evaluated in three research stations represented different environments; Gemmeiza, Mallawi and Nubaria. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Each plot consisted of one row, 6 m long and 0.80 m width. Planting was made in hills spaced at 0.25 m with two kernels per hill, the seedlings were thinned to one plant per hill after 21 days from planting. All agricultural practices were carried out according to standard commercial recommendations for maize production.
Table (1): Code number and name of inbred lines in the current study.
Code
Name
(P1)
Gm.5
(P2)
Gm. 6022
(P3)
Gm. 74
(P4)
Gm. 36
(P5)
Gm. 15 T2
(P6)
Gm. 10
(P7)
Gz. 639
Data were collected for number of days from planting to 50% silk emergence (number of days from planting to the date when 50% of the plants in a row have visible silk), plant height (Average height of 5 guarded plants in centimeters (cm) measured from soil surface to the point on stem where tassel branching begins), ear height (Average height of 5 guarded plants in centimeters (cm) measured from soil surface to the point on stem where ear leaf begins) and grain yield (ard/fed) grams of grain shelled from harvested ears adjusted to 15.5% moisture content (one ardab = 140 Kg, one feddan = 4200 m2). The obtained data were statistically analysis according to Snedecor and Cochran (1980). The combined analysis was done when homogeneity of error mean squares for the three locations was found. General and specific combining ability were estimated according to Griffing (1956), method-4, model-1.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The result of the combined analysis of variance for four studied traits across three locations is presented in Table (2). The mean squares due to locations (L), crosses (C) and their interaction (C x L) were highly significant for all traits, except for C x L for plant and ear height, meaning that the locations differed in their conditions (soil and weather). The mean squares due to GCA and SCA were highly significant for all studied traits, meaning that both GCA (additive gene effects) and SCA (non-additive gene effects) were important in the inheritance of these studied traits. All traits showed GCA/SCA ratio more than unity values except plant height, indicating that the additive gene effects played a major role in the inheritance of days to 50% silking, ear height and grain yield.
Table (2):Mean squares of locations, crosses, GCA, SCA and their interactions for the four studied traits.
SOV
d.f
Days to 50% silking
Plant height
Ear height
Grain yield
Location (L)
2
668.45**
28232.59**
16403.24**
763.09**
Rep/L
6
8.58
494.01
476.40
7.66
Crosses (C)
20
20.63**
1424.46**
943.58**
71.14**
GCA
6
33.57**
1313.95**
1275.72**
82.34**
SCA
14
15.03**
1471.81**
801.24**
66.34**
C x L
40
5.78**
216.15
171.15
12.24**
GCA x L
12
4.16**
267.09
270.56*
10.34
SCA x L
28
6.42**
194.30
128.55
13.07**
Error
120
1.83
195.66
131.85
6.08
GCA /SCA
2.23
0.89
1.59
1.24
*,** significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels of probability, respectively.
Meanwhile the non-additive gene effects played the major role in the inheritance of plant height. The results obtained are in confirmation with the results obtained in maize by El-Shamarka et al. (2015), Karim et al. (2022) and Ismail et al. (2023). The mean squares due to GCA x L interaction were significant and highly significant for ear height and days to 50% siking, respectively. In contrast, mean squares due to SCA x L interaction were highly significant for days to 50% silking and grain yield. Abd El Mottalb and Gamea (2014) found that the additive gene action has the major role in the inheritance of days to 50% siking, plant height and ear height while the non-additive has the major role in inheritance of grain yield. Abd-Elaziz et al. (2021) illustrated that additive gene effect has the major role in inheritance of days to 50% silking, plant height and ear height. Meanwhile, the non-additive gene variance has a major role in the inheritance of grain yield. Ismail et al. (2023) and Mosa et al. (2023) found that the additive gene action has the major role in the inheritance of days to 50% silking, plant height, ear height and grain yield.
The performance of crosses for the four studied traits across the three locations are presented in Table (3). Fifteen crosses from the twenty one crosses exhibited earliness than the earliest check SC. 168. The best crosses were (P1 x P5), (P1 x P6), (P1 x P7) and (P3 x P6). Four crosses (P1 x P5), (P3 x P5), (P3 x P6) and (P3 x P7) were shorter than the shortest check (SC.168); their crosses could be tested in high plant density. The low ear position is favorable to immune crosses from lodging; this appears in three crosses (P3 x P5), (P3 x P6) and (P3 x P7) which had lower ear placement than the best check cross SC 3444. For grain yield, one cross P2 x P3 (34.23 ard/fed) significantly out yielded than the best check cross SC. 168 (30.87 ard/fed). In comparison, five crosses (P1 x P4), (P2 x P5), (P3 x P4), (P4 x P7) and (P6 x P7) did not significantly out yielded the best check (SC. 168). These above crosses will be evaluated in the advanced level of testing in maize breeding program.
General combining ability effects could be estimated whenever the significant of GCA mean squares for the trait is viewed. Estimates of general combining ability effects for days to 50% silking, plant height, ear height and grain yield across the three locations are presented in Table (4). Parents 1 and 3 showed favorable significant negative values for days to 50% silking. Therefore, these parents are recommended to inter earliness program. For plant and ear height, parent 3 showed negative significant GCA effects and is recommended for breeding to plant density tolerance. Parents 2, 4 and 7 showed positive significant GCA effects for grain yield so these parents are good combiners for grain yield. These results suggested the importance of these inbreds being involved in improving the maize program.
Table (3). Mean performance of 21 F1 crosses and two checks for the four traits across the three locations.
cross
Days to 50% silking
Plant height (cm)
Ear height (cm)
Grain yield (ard/fed)
P1 x P2
58.22
213.89
112.11
29.73
P1 x P3
57.11
217.00
107.11
27.18
P1 x P4
58.11
231.67
124.33
31.31
P1 x P5
56.22
207.67
109.78
22.95
P1 x P6
56.44
213.11
115.56
26.33
P1 x P7
56.78
235.11
128.67
30.02
P2 x P3
59.44
238.11
121.00
34.23
P2 x P4
57.67
217.67
114.33
29.82
P2 x P5
60.22
244.00
129.89
30.79
P2 x P6
58.56
239.44
128.89
27.95
P2 x P7
60.33
228.89
121.56
27.55
P3 x P4
57.33
234.56
125.89
30.85
P3 x P5
57.33
211.44
103.56
25.14
P3 x P6
56.44
196.67
95.33
25.15
P3 x P7
56.89
203.33
95.56
24.98
P4 x P5
56.89
216.56
117.00
26.30
P4 x P6
60.78
227.33
123.00
27.27
P4 x P7
60.78
224.89
119.56
31.12
P5 x P6
58.11
218.56
111.22
27.35
P5 x P7
60.11
219.44
119.22
28.13
P6 x P7
58.44
230.33
127.56
32.12
SC. 168
60.33
225.89
124.78
30.87
SC. 3444
62.89
228.78
116.94
30.64
LSD 0.05
1.27
13.12
10.77
2.31
LSD 0.01
1.65
17.01
13.96
3.00
Table (4). Estimates of general combining ability (GCA) effects for the seven inbred lines for the four studied traits.
Inbred
Days to 50% silking
Plant height
Ear height
Grain Yield
P1
-1.26**
-3.15
-0.55
-0.57
P2
1.05**
9.56**
5.49**
1.94**
P3
-0.93**
-6.62**
-10.37**
-0.57
P4
0.47*
3.69
4.76**
1.26**
P5
-0.06
-3.30
-1.93
-1.94**
P6
-0.09
-1.75
0.25
-0.84*
P7
0.82**
1.56
2.36
0.71*
LSDgi 5%
0.37
3.84
3.15
0.68
LSDgi 1%
0.48
4.98
4.09
0.88
LSDgi-gj5%
0.57
5.87
4.82
1.03
LSDgi-gj 1%
0.74
7.61
6.24
1.34
*,** significant at 0.05 and 0.01 levels of probability, respectively.
Specific combining ability effects are estimated whenever the significance of SCA mean squares is in view. SCA effects across the three locations for 21 crosses resulted from the half diallel of seven parents are presented in Table (5). Results showed that five crosses (P1 x P7), (P2 x P4), (P3 x P6), (P3 x P7), and (P4 x P5) had negative significant SCA effects for days to 50% silking toward earliness. For plant height, five crosses (P1 x P2), (P1 x P5), (P2 x P4), (P3 x P6) and (P3 x P7) showed significant negative SCA effects for short plants. Four crosses (P1 x P2), (P2 x P4), (P3 x P6) and (P3 x P7) exhibited significant negative SCA effects for ear height. For grain yield, SCA showed significant positive effects in seven crosses (P1 x P4), (P1 x P7), (P2 x P3), (P2 x P5), (P3 x P4), (P5 x P6) and (P6 x P7).
Table (5). Estimates for specific combining ability (SCA) effects for 21 crosses for the four studied traits.
Cross
Days to 50% silking Silk
Plant height
Ear height
Grain Yield
P1 x P2
0.24
-14.89**
-9.55**
-0.04
P1 x P3
1.10**
4.40
1.32
-0.08
P1 x P4
0.70
8.76*
3.41
2.22**
P1 x P5
-0.65
-8.24*
-4.46
-2.94**
P1 x P6
-0.41
-4.36
-0.86
-0.66
P1 x P7
-0.98**
14.33**
10.14**
1.49*
P2 x P3
1.13**
12.80**
9.16**
4.47**
P2 x P4
-2.05**
-17.96**
-12.64**
-1.78**
P2 x P5
1.04**
15.38**
9.61**
2.39**
P2 x P6
-0.61
9.27*
6.43*
-1.55*
P2 x P7
0.26
-4.60
-3.01
-3.50**
P3 x P4
-0.41
15.11**
14.78**
1.76**
P3 x P5
0.13
-1.00
-0.86
-0.74
P3 x P6
-0.74*
-17.33**
-11.26**
-1.84**
P3 x P7
-1.21**
-13.98**
-13.15**
-3.56**
P4 x P5
-1.72**
-6.20
-2.55
-1.42*
P4 x P6
2.19**
3.02
1.27
-1.54*
P4 x P7
1.28**
-2.73
-4.28
0.75
P5 x P6
0.06
1.24
-3.81
1.74**
P5 x P7
1.15**
-1.18
2.07
0.97
P6 x P7
-0.50
8.16*
8.23**
3.85**
LSDSIJ5%
0.73
7.58
6.22
1.34
LSDSIJ1%
0.95
9.82
8.06
1.73
LSD SIJ-SIK 5%
1.14
11.74
9.63
2.07
LSD SIJ-SIK1%
1.47
15.22
12.49
2.68
*,** significant at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability, respectively.
الملخص العربى
تحليل الدياليل لسبعة سلالات من الذرة الشامية لصفات مختلفة عبر المواقع
محمد عبدالعزيز عبدالنبى عبدالعزيز و محمد موسى بدوى درويش وهشام عبدالحميد ابويوسف وعبدالفتاح عفيفى محمد عفيفى و محمد رضا اسماعيل و نوره على حسن
قسم بحوث الذرة الشامية – معهد بحوث المحاصيل الحقلية – مركز البحوث الزراعية – الجيــزة
استخدمت فى هذه الدراسة سبعة سلالات منتخبة صفراء من الذرة الشامية مشتقة من مصادر وراثية مختلفة وذلك لدراسة القدرة الائتلافية ، طبيعة الفعل الجينى والهجن المتفوقة مقارنة بأعلى هجن المقارنة المستخدمة. حيث ان فى الموسم الزراعى 2021 تم إجراء كافة التهجينات الممكنة بين السلالات فى نظام تزاوج الدياليل النصف دائرى بإستخدام طريقة جريفينج 1956 ، طريقة -4 نموذج -1 للحصول على 21 هجين بمحطة البحوث الزراعية بالجميزة. فى الموسم الزراعى 2022 تم تقييم الـ 21 هجين بالأضافة إلى هجينين للمقارنة وهما هجين فردى 168 وهجين فردى بايونيير 3444 فى تصميم القطاعات كاملة العشوائية بثلاثة مكررات فى ثلاث محطات بحثية هى الجميزة و ملوى و النوبارية. أخذت البيانات على صفات عدد الايام حتى ظهور 50 %حريرة ، إرتفاع النبات ، إرتفاع الكوز ومحصول الحبوب أردب/فدان. أظهرت النتائج وجود إختلافات معنوية بين الثلاثة مواقع لكافة الصفات المدروسة. أظهرت النتائج أن التباينات الراجعة للهجن ومجزئاتها (القدرة العامة على للائتلاف والقدرة الخاصة على للائتلاف عالية المعنوية لكل صفات الدراسة. وهذا يشير إلى اهمية الفعل الجينى المضيف وغير المضيف فى وراثة هذه الصفات. ومع ذلك الفعل الوراثى المضيف كان اكبر اهمية فى كلا من صفات ظهور 50% حريرة وارتفاع الكوز والمحصول بينما كان الفعل غير المضيف اكثر اهمية فى وراثة ارتفاع النبات. أظهرت النتائج إلى أن أفضل السلالات فى تاثيرات القدرة العامة على الائتلاف لصفة المحصول هى السلالة 2 و السلالة 4 والسلالة 7. اظهرت سبعة هجن قدرة ائتلافية خاصة لصفة محصول الحبوب (جميزة 5 xجميزة 36 و جميزة 5 xجيزة 639 و جميزة 6022 xجميزة 74 و جميزة 6022 xجميزة 15 و جميزة 74 xجميزة 36 و جميزة 15 xجميزة 10و جميزة 10 xجيزة 639 و الهجين جميزة 74x جميزة 6022 تفوق فى المحصول معنويا (34,21 اردب للفدان) عن افضل هجن المقارنة هجين فردى 168(30.87 اردب للفدان) ومن ثم يرشح للدخول فى تجارب التقييم على نطاق اوسع فى عدة جهات تمهيدا لتسجيله واعتماده للانتاج التجارى.
References
Abd El-Azeem, M. E. M., R. S. H. Aly, W. M. El Sayed and Noura A. Hassan (2021). Combining ability and gene action using 10 X 10 diallel crosses of ten maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.). J. of Plant Production, Mansoura Univ. 12: 1205-1211.
Abd-Elaziz, M. A. A., M. A. A. Hassan, S. M. Abo El-Haress, H. M. El.-Shahed and Noura A. Hassan (2021). Determining combining ability of some newly developed yellow maize inbred lines using line X tester design. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology 22: 208-215.
Abd El-Mottalb, A. A. and H. A. A. Gamea (2014). Combining ability analysis in new white maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.). Minufiya J. Agric. Res. 39: 143-151.
Abo El-Haress, S. M. (2015). Diallel analysis for yield, downy mildew and agronomic characters in maize (Zea mays L.). Alex. J. Agric. Res. 60: 25-31.
Attia, A. N., M. S. Sultan, M. A. Badawi, M. A. Abdel–Moneam and A. R. M. Al-Rawi (2015). Estimation of combining ability and heterosis for some maize inbred lines and its single crosses. J. Plant Production, Mansoura Univ. 6: 83-98
El-Hosary A. A. A., M. H. Motawea, A. A. Elgammal (2018). Combining ability for yield and some of its attributes in maize across two locations. Egypt. J. Plant Breed. 22: 625-640.
El-Shamarka, Sh. A., M. Abdel-Sattar and M. El-Nahas (2015). Heterosis and combining ability for yield and its components through diallel cross analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). Alex. J. Agric. Res. 60: 87-94.
Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aus. J. of Biol. Sci. 9: 463-493.
Ismail, M. R., H. A. Aboyousef, M. A. A. Abd-Elaziz, A. A. M. Afifi and M. S. Shalof (2023). Diallel analysis of maize inbred lines for estimating superiority and combining ability. African Crop Science Journal 31: 417 – 425.
Kamara, M. M. (2015). Diallel analysis of some yellow maize inbred lines under low and normal nitrogen levels. International J. of Plant Breeding and genetics 9: 32-43.
Kamara, M. M., S. A. Okasha and Kh. A. M. Ibrahim (2019). Diallel cross analysis for some white maize inbred lines under two nitrogen levels. Journal of Plant Production Sciences; Suez Canal University 8: 1-10.
Karim, A., S. Ahmed, Z. A. Talukder, M. K. Alam and M. M Billah (2022). Combining ability and heterosis study for grain yield and yield contributing traits of maize (Zea mays L.). Bangladesh Journal Agricultural Research 47: 81-90.
Melchenger, A. E., M. Lee, K. P. Lamkey, A. R. Hallauer and W. L. Woodman (1990). Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms and heterosis for two diallel sets of maize inbreds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 488-496.
Mosa, H. E. (2006). Diallel analysis of nine white maize inbred lines for different characters under different locations. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 31: 2073- 2080.
Mosa, H. E., M. A. A. Hassan, Yosra, A. Galal, M. S. Rizk and T. T. El-Mouslly (2023). Combining ability of elite maize inbred lines for grain yield, resistance to both late wilt and northern leaf blight disease under different environments. Egyptian J. of Breed. 27: 269-287.
Murtadha. M. A., O. J. Ariyo and S. S. Alghamdi (2018) Analysis of combining ability over environments in diallel crosses of maize (Zea mays). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 17: 69-78.
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1980) Statistical Methods. 7th Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
Sprague, G. F. and L. A. Tatum (1942) General vs combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Amer. Sco. Agro. 34: 923-932.
Wani, M. M. A., S. A. Wani, Z. A. Dar, A. A. Lone, I. Abedi and A. Gazal (2017). Combining ability analysis in early maturing maize inbred lines under temperate conditions, Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 5: 456-466.
Zelleke, H. (2000). Combining ability for grain yield and other agronomic characters in inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Indian J. Genet. And Plant Breed. 60: 63-70.